Search for: All records

Wildfires pose an escalating risk to communities and infrastructure, especially in regions undergoing increased fuel dryness and temperature extremes driven by climate change, as well as continued expansion into the wildland-urban interface (WUI). Probabilistic wildfire risk assessment provides a rigorous means of quantifying potential impacts, but its application is often hindered by the high computational cost of working with hundreds of thousands of complex wildfire scenarios. This study introduces a novel scenario reduction framework tailored to the unique characteristics of wildfire hazards, which often lack standard intensity metrics and exhibit highly nonlinear, spatially distributed behavior. The proposed framework selects a subset of scenarios that best represent the spatial and statistical diversity of the full dataset, thereby greatly reducing computational costs while accounting for uncertainties. This is achieved by mapping complex wildfire scenarios into a high-dimensional feature space, enabling similarity assessments based on spatial consequence patterns rather than standard intensity metrics. A k-medoids clustering approach is then used to identify a representative subset of scenarios, while an active-learning-based outlier selection procedure incorporates rare but high-impact events without inflating computational demands. The framework was first demonstrated using a simple illustrative example to show how its performance responds to different data characteristics. To further demonstrate the practicality of the framework, it was used for wildfire risk assessment in Spokane County, Washington, where the full dataset (1000 scenarios) was reduced to 41 representative scenarios while preserving the spatial patterns of burn probability and building damage with high fidelity. The results demonstrated that the framework significantly improves computational efficiency and accuracy compared to traditional scenario reduction methods, offering a scalable and flexible tool for probabilistic wildfire risk assessment.