Search for: All records

We examine the collective behavior of single cells in microbial systems to provide insights into the origin of the biological clock. Microfluidics has opened a window onto how single cells can synchronize their behavior. Four hypotheses are proposed to explain the origin of the clock from the synchronized behavior of single cells. These hypotheses depend on the presence or absence of a communication mechanism between the clocks in single cells and the presence or absence of a stochastic component in the clock mechanism. To test these models, we integrate physical models for the behavior of the clocks in single cells or filaments with new approaches to measuring clocks in single cells. As an example, we provide evidence for a quorum-sensing signal both with microfluidics experiments on single cells and with continuousin vivometabolism NMR (CIVM-NMR). We also provide evidence for the stochastic component in clocks of single cells. Throughout this study, ensemble methods from statistical physics are used to characterize the clock at both the single-cell level and the macroscopic scale of 10⁶cells. 

Gene duplication is a fundamental evolutionary mechanism that contributes to biological complexity and diversity [6]. Traditionally, research has focused on the duplication of gene sequences [23]. However, evidence suggests that the duplication of regulatory elements may also play a significant role in the evolution of genomic functions [8, 21]. In this work the evolution of regulatory relationships belonging to gene-specific-substructures in a GRN are modeled. In the model, a network grows from an initial configuration by repeatedly choosing a random gene to duplicate. The likelihood that the regulatory relationships associated with the selected gene are retained through duplication is determined by a vector of probabilities. That is to say that each gene family has its own probability of retaining regulatory relationships. Occurrences of gene-family-specific substructures are counted under the gene duplication model. In this work gene-family-specific substructures are referred to as subnetwork motifs. These subnetwork motifs are motivated by network motifs which are patterns of interconnections that recur more often in a specialized network than in a random network [15]. Subnetwork motifs differ from network motifs in the way that subnetwork motifs are instances of gene-family-specific substructures while network motifs are isomorphic substructures. These subnetwork motifs are counted under Full and Partial Duplication, which differ in the way in which regulation relationships are inherited. Full duplication occurs when all regulatory links are inherited at each duplication step, and Partial Duplication occurs when regulation inheritance varies at each duplication step. Note that Full Duplication is just a special case of Partial Duplication. Moments for the number of occurrences of subnetwork motifs are determined in each model. In the end, the results presented offer a method for discovering gene-family-specific substructures that are significant in a GRN under gene duplication.