More Like this

1. High Potential Nitrate Removal by Urban Accidental Wetlands in a Desert City: Limitations and Spatiotemporal Patterns

   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-019-00465-8  

   Suchy, Amanda K. ; Palta, Monica M. ; Stromberg, Juliet C. ; Childers, Daniel L. ( September 2020 , Ecosystems)

   null (Ed.)
2. Sensitivity of nitrate concentration‐discharge patterns to soil nitrate distribution and drainage properties in the vertical dimension

   https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13742  

   Chen, Xiaoli ; Tague, Christina L. ; Melack, John M. ; Keller, Arturo A. ( May 2020 , Hydrological Processes)
3. Seeing the light: urban stream restoration affects stream metabolism and nitrate uptake via changes in canopy cover

   https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1941  

   Reisinger, Alexander J. ; Doody, Thomas R. ; Groffman, Peter M. ; Kaushal, Sujay S. ; Rosi, Emma J. ( July 2019 , Ecological Applications)
4. Balancing Upland Green Infrastructure and Stream Restoration to Recover Urban Stormwater and Nitrate Load Retention

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130364  

   Zhang, Ruoyu ; Band, Lawrence E. ; Groffman, Peter M. ( October 2023 , Journal of Hydrology)
5. The impact of stream‐groundwater exchange on seasonal nitrate loads in an urban stream

   https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14324  

   Beltran, Julio ; Lautz, Laura K. ; Slosson, John R. ( August 2021 , Hydrological Processes)

   Urbanization negatively impacts water quality in streams by reducing stream‐groundwater interactions, which can reduce a stream's capacity to naturally attenuate nitrate. Meadowbrook Creek, a first order urban stream in Syracuse, New York, has an inverse urbanization gradient, with heavily urbanized headwaters that are disconnected from the floodplain and downstream reaches that have intact riparian floodplains and connection to riparian aquifers. This system allows assessment of how stream‐groundwater interactions in urban streams impact the net sources and sinks of nitrate at the reach scale. We used continuous (15‐min) streamflow measurements and weekly grab samples at three gauging stations positioned longitudinally along the creek to develop continuous nitrate load estimates at the inlet and outlet of two contrasting reaches. Nitrate load estimates were determined using a USGS linear regression model, RLOADEST, and differences between loads at the inlet and outlet of contrasting reaches were used to quantify nitrate sink and source behaviour year‐round. We observed a nitrate load of 1.4 × 10⁴ kg NO₃⁻per water year, on average, at the outlet of the urbanized reach while the nitrate load at the outlet of the downstream, connected reach was 1.0 × 10⁴ kg NO₃⁻per water year, on average. We found the more heavily urbanized, hydrologically‐disconnected reach was a net source of nitrate regardless of season. In contrast, stream‐groundwater exchange caused the hydrologically connected reach to be both a source and sink for nitrate, depending on time of year. Both reaches alter nitrate source and sink behaviour at various spatiotemporal scales. Groundwater connection in the downstream, connected reach reduces annual nitrate loads and provides more opportunities for sources and sinks of nitrate year‐round than the hydrologically disconnected stream reach. Mechanisms include groundwater discharge into the stream with variable nitrate concentrations, surface‐water groundwater interactions that foster denitrification, and stream load loss to surrounding near‐stream aquifers. This study emphasizes how loads are important in understanding how stream‐groundwater interactions impact reach scale nitrate export in urban streams.

    

   more » « less