More Like this

1. 5G NFV RAN Network Slicing Bench: The 5th-Generation Network Function Virtualization Radio Access Network Slicing Benchmarks

   Jianda Wang, Yang Hu ( January 2019 , International Conference on Workload Characterization)
2. Multilayer network modeling creates opportunities for novel network statistics

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2017.12.005  

   Muldoon, Sarah Feldt ( March 2018 , Physics of Life Reviews)
3. INDIANA—In-Network Distributed Infrastructure for Advanced Network Applications

   https://doi.org/10.1177/10943420231179662  

   Ossen, Sabra ; Musser, Jeremy ; Dalessandro, Luke ; Swany, Martin ( July 2023 , The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications)

   Data volumes are exploding as sensors proliferate and become more capable. Edge computing is envisioned as a path to distribute processing and reduce latency. Many models of Edge computing consider small devices running conventional software. Our model includes a more lightweight execution engine for network microservices and a network scheduling framework to configure network processing elements to process streams and direct the appropriate traffic to them. In this article, we describe INDIANA, a complete framework for in-network microservices. We will describe how the two components-the INDIANA network Processing Element (InPE) and the Flange Network Operating System (NOS)-work together to achieve effective in-network processing to improve performance in edge to cloud environments. Our processing elements provide lightweight compute units optimized for efficient stream processing. These elements are customizable and vary in sophistication and resource consumption. The Flange NOS provides first-class flow based reasoning to drive function placement, network configuration, and load balancing that can respond dynamically to network conditions. We describe design considerations and discuss our approach and implementations. We evaluate the performance of stream processing and examine the performance of several exemplar applications on networks of increasing scale and complexity.

    

   more » « less
4. Safety Verification of Neural Network Control Systems Using Guaranteed Neural Network Model Reduction

   https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC51059.2022.9992984  

   Xiang, Weiming ; Shao, Zhongzhu ( December 2022 , 2022 IEEE 61st Conference on Decision and Control (CDC))

   This paper aims to enhance the computational efficiency of safety verification of neural network control systems by developing a guaranteed neural network model reduction method. First, a concept of model reduction precision is proposed to describe the guaranteed distance between the outputs of a neural network and its reduced-size version. A reachability-based algorithm is proposed to accurately compute the model reduction precision. Then, by substituting a reduced-size neural network controller into the closed-loop system, an algorithm to compute the reachable set of the original system is developed, which is able to support much more computationally efficient safety verification processes. Finally, the developed methods are applied to a case study of the Adaptive Cruise Control system with a neural network controller, which is shown to significantly reduce the computational time of safety verification and thus validate the effectiveness of the method. 

   more » « less
5. Upscaling Wetland Methane Emissions From the FLUXNET‐CH4 Eddy Covariance Network (UpCH4 v1.0): Model Development, Network Assessment, and Budget Comparison

   https://doi.org/10.1029/2023AV000956  

   McNicol, Gavin ; Fluet‐Chouinard, Etienne ; Ouyang, Zutao ; Knox, Sara ; Zhang, Zhen ; Aalto, Tuula ; Bansal, Sheel ; Chang, Kuang‐Yu ; Chen, Min ; Delwiche, Kyle ; et al ( October 2023 , AGU Advances)

   Wetlands are responsible for 20%–31% of global methane (CH₄) emissions and account for a large source of uncertainty in the global CH₄budget. Data‐driven upscaling of CH₄fluxes from eddy covariance measurements can provide new and independent bottom‐up estimates of wetland CH₄emissions. Here, we develop a six‐predictor random forest upscaling model (UpCH4), trained on 119 site‐years of eddy covariance CH₄flux data from 43 freshwater wetland sites in the FLUXNET‐CH4 Community Product. Network patterns in site‐level annual means and mean seasonal cycles of CH₄fluxes were reproduced accurately in tundra, boreal, and temperate regions (Nash‐Sutcliffe Efficiency ∼0.52–0.63 and 0.53). UpCH4 estimated annual global wetland CH₄emissions of 146 ± 43 TgCH₄ y⁻¹for 2001–2018 which agrees closely with current bottom‐up land surface models (102–181 TgCH₄ y⁻¹) and overlaps with top‐down atmospheric inversion models (155–200 TgCH₄ y⁻¹). However, UpCH4 diverged from both types of models in the spatial pattern and seasonal dynamics of tropical wetland emissions. We conclude that upscaling of eddy covariance CH₄fluxes has the potential to produce realistic extra‐tropical wetland CH₄emissions estimates which will improve with more flux data. To reduce uncertainty in upscaled estimates, researchers could prioritize new wetland flux sites along humid‐to‐arid tropical climate gradients, from major rainforest basins (Congo, Amazon, and SE Asia), into monsoon (Bangladesh and India) and savannah regions (African Sahel) and be paired with improved knowledge of wetland extent seasonal dynamics in these regions. The monthly wetland methane products gridded at 0.25° from UpCH4 are available via ORNL DAAC (https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/2253).

    

   more » « less