skip to main content


Title: Visualization of Range-Constrained Optimal Density Clustering of Trajectories
We present a system for efficient detection, continuous maintenance and visualization of range-constrained optimal density clusters of moving objects trajectories, a.k.a. Continuous Maximizing Range Sum (Co-MaxRS) queries. Co-MaxRS is useful in any domain involving continuous detection of “most interesting” regions involving mobile entities (e.g., traffic monitoring, environmental tracking, etc.). Traditional MaxRS finds a location of a given rectangle R which maximizes the sum of the weighted-points (objects) in its interior. Since moving objects continuously change their locations, the MaxRS at a particular time instant need not be a solution at another time instant. Our system solves two important problems: (1) Efficiently computing Co-MaxRS answer-set; and (2) Visualizing the results. This demo will present the implementation of our efficient pruning schemes and compact data structures, and illustrate the end-user tools for specifying the parameters and selecting datasets for Co-MaxRS, along with visualization of the optimal locations.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1646107
NSF-PAR ID:
10040591
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Advances in Spatial and Temporal Databases - 15th International Symposium, {SSTD} 2017, Arlington, VA, USA, August 21-23, 2017, Proceedings
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. We address the problem of efficient maintenance of the answer to a new type of query: Continuous Maximizing Range- Sum (Co-MaxRS) for moving objects trajectories. The traditional static/spatial MaxRS problem finds a location for placing the centroid of a given (axes-parallel) rectangle R so that the sum of the weights of the point-objects from a given set O inside the interior of R is maximized. However, moving objects continuously change their locations over time, so the MaxRS solution for a particular time instant need not be a solution at another time instant. In this paper, we devise the conditions under which a particular MaxRS solution may cease to be valid and a new optimal location for the query-rectangle R is needed. More specifically, we solve the problem of maintaining the trajectory of the centroid of R. In addition, we propose efficient pruning strategies (and corresponding data structures) to speed-up the process of maintaining the accuracy of the Co-MaxRS solution. We prove the correctness of our approach and present experimental evaluations over both real and synthetic datasets, demonstrating the benefits of the proposed methods. 
    more » « less
  2. We address the problem of maintaining the correct answer-sets to the Conditional Maximizing Range-Sum (C-MaxRS) query in spatial data streams. Given a set of (possibly weighted) 2D point objects, the traditional MaxRS problem determines an optimal placement for an axes-parallel rectangle r so that the number – or, the weighted sum – of objects in its interior is maximized. In many practical settings, the objects from a particular set – e.g., restaurants – can be of distinct types – e.g., fast-food, Asian, etc. The C-MaxRS problem deals with maximizing the overall sum, given class-based existential constraints, i.e., a lower bound on the count of objects of interests from particular classes. We first propose an efficient algorithm to the static C-MaxRS query, and extend the solution to handle dynamic (data streams) settings. Our experiments over datasets of up to 100,000 objects show that the proposed solutions provide significant efficiency benefits. 
    more » « less
  3. This work addresses a novel variant of the Maximum Range-Sum (MaxRS) query for settings in which spatial point objects occur dynamically and, upon occurrence, their significance (i.e., weight) decays over time. The objective of the original MaxRS query is to find a location to place (the centroid of) a fixed-size spatial rectangle so that the sum of the weights of the point objects in its interior is maximized. The unique aspect of the problem studied in this paper, which we call DDW-MaxRS (Dynamic and Decaying Weights MaxRS), is that the placement of its solution can vary over time due to the joint impact of the arrival of new objects and the change of the corresponding weights of the existing objects over time. To improve the efficiency of the DDW-MaxRS problem processing, we propose a memory-efficient approximate algorithmic solution that will naturally infuse uncertainty in the answer. We formally analyze the error bounds’ properties and provide experimental results to quantify the effectiveness of the proposed approach. 
    more » « less
  4. We address the problem of in-network processing of k-Maximizing Range Sum (k-MaxRS) queries inWireless Sensor Networks (WSN). The traditional, Computational Geometry version of the MaxRS problem considers the setting in which, given a set of (possibly weighted) 2D points, the goal is to determine the optimal location for a given (axes-parallel) rectangle R to be placed so that the sum of the weights (or, a simple count) of the input points in R’s interior is maximized. In WSN, this corresponds to finding the location of region R such that the sum of the sensors’ readings inside R is maximized. The k-MaxRS problem deals with maximizing the overall sum over k such rectangular regions. Since centralized processing – i.e., transmitting the raw readings and subsequently determining the k-MaxRS in a dedicated sink – incur communication overheads, we devised an efficient distributed algorithm for in-network computation of k-MaxRS. Our experimental observations show that the novel algorithm provides significant energy/communication savings when compared to the centralized approach. 
    more » « less
  5. null (Ed.)
    The DeepLearningEpilepsyDetectionChallenge: design, implementation, andtestofanewcrowd-sourced AIchallengeecosystem Isabell Kiral*, Subhrajit Roy*, Todd Mummert*, Alan Braz*, Jason Tsay, Jianbin Tang, Umar Asif, Thomas Schaffter, Eren Mehmet, The IBM Epilepsy Consortium◊ , Joseph Picone, Iyad Obeid, Bruno De Assis Marques, Stefan Maetschke, Rania Khalaf†, Michal Rosen-Zvi† , Gustavo Stolovitzky† , Mahtab Mirmomeni† , Stefan Harrer† * These authors contributed equally to this work † Corresponding authors: rkhalaf@us.ibm.com, rosen@il.ibm.com, gustavo@us.ibm.com, mahtabm@au1.ibm.com, sharrer@au.ibm.com ◊ Members of the IBM Epilepsy Consortium are listed in the Acknowledgements section J. Picone and I. Obeid are with Temple University, USA. T. Schaffter is with Sage Bionetworks, USA. E. Mehmet is with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA. All other authors are with IBM Research in USA, Israel and Australia. Introduction This decade has seen an ever-growing number of scientific fields benefitting from the advances in machine learning technology and tooling. More recently, this trend reached the medical domain, with applications reaching from cancer diagnosis [1] to the development of brain-machine-interfaces [2]. While Kaggle has pioneered the crowd-sourcing of machine learning challenges to incentivise data scientists from around the world to advance algorithm and model design, the increasing complexity of problem statements demands of participants to be expert data scientists, deeply knowledgeable in at least one other scientific domain, and competent software engineers with access to large compute resources. People who match this description are few and far between, unfortunately leading to a shrinking pool of possible participants and a loss of experts dedicating their time to solving important problems. Participation is even further restricted in the context of any challenge run on confidential use cases or with sensitive data. Recently, we designed and ran a deep learning challenge to crowd-source the development of an automated labelling system for brain recordings, aiming to advance epilepsy research. A focus of this challenge, run internally in IBM, was the development of a platform that lowers the barrier of entry and therefore mitigates the risk of excluding interested parties from participating. The challenge: enabling wide participation With the goal to run a challenge that mobilises the largest possible pool of participants from IBM (global), we designed a use case around previous work in epileptic seizure prediction [3]. In this “Deep Learning Epilepsy Detection Challenge”, participants were asked to develop an automatic labelling system to reduce the time a clinician would need to diagnose patients with epilepsy. Labelled training and blind validation data for the challenge were generously provided by Temple University Hospital (TUH) [4]. TUH also devised a novel scoring metric for the detection of seizures that was used as basis for algorithm evaluation [5]. In order to provide an experience with a low barrier of entry, we designed a generalisable challenge platform under the following principles: 1. No participant should need to have in-depth knowledge of the specific domain. (i.e. no participant should need to be a neuroscientist or epileptologist.) 2. No participant should need to be an expert data scientist. 3. No participant should need more than basic programming knowledge. (i.e. no participant should need to learn how to process fringe data formats and stream data efficiently.) 4. No participant should need to provide their own computing resources. In addition to the above, our platform should further • guide participants through the entire process from sign-up to model submission, • facilitate collaboration, and • provide instant feedback to the participants through data visualisation and intermediate online leaderboards. The platform The architecture of the platform that was designed and developed is shown in Figure 1. The entire system consists of a number of interacting components. (1) A web portal serves as the entry point to challenge participation, providing challenge information, such as timelines and challenge rules, and scientific background. The portal also facilitated the formation of teams and provided participants with an intermediate leaderboard of submitted results and a final leaderboard at the end of the challenge. (2) IBM Watson Studio [6] is the umbrella term for a number of services offered by IBM. Upon creation of a user account through the web portal, an IBM Watson Studio account was automatically created for each participant that allowed users access to IBM's Data Science Experience (DSX), the analytics engine Watson Machine Learning (WML), and IBM's Cloud Object Storage (COS) [7], all of which will be described in more detail in further sections. (3) The user interface and starter kit were hosted on IBM's Data Science Experience platform (DSX) and formed the main component for designing and testing models during the challenge. DSX allows for real-time collaboration on shared notebooks between team members. A starter kit in the form of a Python notebook, supporting the popular deep learning libraries TensorFLow [8] and PyTorch [9], was provided to all teams to guide them through the challenge process. Upon instantiation, the starter kit loaded necessary python libraries and custom functions for the invisible integration with COS and WML. In dedicated spots in the notebook, participants could write custom pre-processing code, machine learning models, and post-processing algorithms. The starter kit provided instant feedback about participants' custom routines through data visualisations. Using the notebook only, teams were able to run the code on WML, making use of a compute cluster of IBM's resources. The starter kit also enabled submission of the final code to a data storage to which only the challenge team had access. (4) Watson Machine Learning provided access to shared compute resources (GPUs). Code was bundled up automatically in the starter kit and deployed to and run on WML. WML in turn had access to shared storage from which it requested recorded data and to which it stored the participant's code and trained models. (5) IBM's Cloud Object Storage held the data for this challenge. Using the starter kit, participants could investigate their results as well as data samples in order to better design custom algorithms. (6) Utility Functions were loaded into the starter kit at instantiation. This set of functions included code to pre-process data into a more common format, to optimise streaming through the use of the NutsFlow and NutsML libraries [10], and to provide seamless access to the all IBM services used. Not captured in the diagram is the final code evaluation, which was conducted in an automated way as soon as code was submitted though the starter kit, minimising the burden on the challenge organising team. Figure 1: High-level architecture of the challenge platform Measuring success The competitive phase of the "Deep Learning Epilepsy Detection Challenge" ran for 6 months. Twenty-five teams, with a total number of 87 scientists and software engineers from 14 global locations participated. All participants made use of the starter kit we provided and ran algorithms on IBM's infrastructure WML. Seven teams persisted until the end of the challenge and submitted final solutions. The best performing solutions reached seizure detection performances which allow to reduce hundred-fold the time eliptologists need to annotate continuous EEG recordings. Thus, we expect the developed algorithms to aid in the diagnosis of epilepsy by significantly shortening manual labelling time. Detailed results are currently in preparation for publication. Equally important to solving the scientific challenge, however, was to understand whether we managed to encourage participation from non-expert data scientists. Figure 2: Primary occupation as reported by challenge participants Out of the 40 participants for whom we have occupational information, 23 reported Data Science or AI as their main job description, 11 reported being a Software Engineer, and 2 people had expertise in Neuroscience. Figure 2 shows that participants had a variety of specialisations, including some that are in no way related to data science, software engineering, or neuroscience. No participant had deep knowledge and experience in data science, software engineering and neuroscience. Conclusion Given the growing complexity of data science problems and increasing dataset sizes, in order to solve these problems, it is imperative to enable collaboration between people with differences in expertise with a focus on inclusiveness and having a low barrier of entry. We designed, implemented, and tested a challenge platform to address exactly this. Using our platform, we ran a deep-learning challenge for epileptic seizure detection. 87 IBM employees from several business units including but not limited to IBM Research with a variety of skills, including sales and design, participated in this highly technical challenge. 
    more » « less