skip to main content

Explore Research Products in the NSF-PAR

Title: A sequential simplex algorithm for automatic data and center selecting radial basis functions
We propose a sequential algorithm for learning sparse radial basis approximations for streaming data. The initial phase of the algorithm formulates the RBF training as a convex optimization problem with an objective function on the expansion weights while the data fitting problem imposed only as an ℓ∞-norm constraint. Each new data point observed is tested for feasibility, i.e., whether the data fitting constraint is satisfied. If so, that point is discarded and no model update is required. If it is infeasible, a new basic variable is added to the linear program. The result is a primal infeasible-dual feasible solution. The dual simplex algorithm is applied to determine a new optimal solution. A large fraction of the streaming data points does not require updates to the RBF model since they are similar enough to previously observed data and satisfy the data fitting constraints. The structure of the simplex algorithm makes the update to the solution particularly efficient given the inverse of the new basis matrix is easily computed from the old inverse. The second phase of the algorithm involves a non-convex refinement of the convex problem. Given the sparse nature of the LP solution, the computational expense of the non-convex algorithm is greatly reduced. We have also found that a small subset of the training data that includes the novel data identified by the algorithm can be used to train the non-convex optimization problem with substantial computation savings and comparable errors on the test data. We illustrate the method on the Mackey-Glass chaotic time-series, the monthly sunspot data, and a Fort Collins, Colorado weather data set. In each case we compare the results to artificial neural networks (ANN) and standard skew-RBFs.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1633830
NSF-PAR ID:
10045395
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
2017 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN)
Page Range / eLocation ID:
549 to 556
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ( , IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence)
    Iterative neural networks (INN) are rapidly gaining attention for solving inverse problems in imaging, image processing, and computer vision. INNs combine regression NNs and an iterative model-based image reconstruction (MBIR) algorithm, often leading to both good generalization capability and outperforming reconstruction quality over existing MBIR optimization models. This paper proposes the first fast and convergent INN architecture, Momentum-Net, by generalizing a block-wise MBIR algorithm that uses momentum and majorizers with regression NNs. For fast MBIR, Momentum-Net uses momentum terms in extrapolation modules, and noniterative MBIR modules at each iteration by using majorizers, where each iteration of Momentum-Net consists of three core modules: image refining, extrapolation, and MBIR. Momentum-Net guarantees convergence to a fixed-point for general differentiable (non)convex MBIR functions (or data-fit terms) and convex feasible sets, under two asymptomatic conditions. To consider data-fit variations across training and testing samples, we also propose a regularization parameter selection scheme based on the “spectral spread” of majorization matrices. Numerical experiments for light-field photography using a focal stack and sparse-view computational tomography demonstrate that, given identical regression NN architectures, Momentum-Net significantly improves MBIR speed and accuracy over several existing INNs; it significantly improves reconstruction quality compared to a state-of-the-art MBIR method in each application 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ( , Mathematical Programming)
    Abstract

    We present a new feasible proximal gradient method for constrained optimization where both the objective and constraint functions are given by summation of a smooth, possibly nonconvex function and a convex simple function. The algorithm converts the original problem into a sequence of convex subproblems. Formulating those subproblems requires the evaluation of at most one gradient-value of the original objective and constraint functions. Either exact or approximate subproblems solutions can be computed efficiently in many cases. An important feature of the algorithm is the constraint level parameter. By carefully increasing this level for each subproblem, we provide a simple solution to overcome the challenge of bounding the Lagrangian multipliers and show that the algorithm follows a strictly feasible solution path till convergence to the stationary point. We develop a simple, proximal gradient descent type analysis, showing that the complexity bound of this new algorithm is comparable to gradient descent for the unconstrained setting which is new in the literature. Exploiting this new design and analysis technique, we extend our algorithms to some more challenging constrained optimization problems where (1) the objective is a stochastic or finite-sum function, and (2) structured nonsmooth functions replace smooth components of both objective and constraint functions. Complexity results for these problems also seem to be new in the literature. Finally, our method can also be applied to convex function constrained problems where we show complexities similar to the proximal gradient method.

     
    more » « less
  3. ; ( , Networks)
    Abstract

    Given the costs and a feasible solution for a minimum cost flow problem on a countably infinite network, inverse optimization involves finding new costs that are close to the original ones and that make the given solution optimal. We study this problem using the weighted absolute sum metric to quantify closeness of cost vectors. We provide sufficient conditions under which known results from inverse optimization in minimum cost flow problems on finite networks extend to the countably infinite case. These conditions ensure that recent duality results on countably infinite linear programs can be applied to our setting. Specifically, they enable us to prove that the inverse optimization problem can be reformulated as a capacitated, minimum cost circulation problem on a countably infinite network. Finite‐dimensional truncations of this problem can be solved in polynomial time when the weights equal one, which yields an efficient solution method. The circulation problem can also be solved via the shadow simplex method, where each finite‐dimensional truncation is tackled using the usual network Simplex algorithm that is empirically known to be computationally efficient. We illustrate these results on an infinite horizon shortest path problem.

     
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ( , Computer Graphics Forum)
    Abstract

    In example‐based inverse linear blend skinning (LBS), a collection of poses (e.g. animation frames) are given, and the goal is finding skinning weights and transformation matrices that closely reproduce the input. These poses may come from physical simulation, direct mesh editing, motion capture or another deformation rig. We provide a re‐formulation of inverse skinning as a problem in high‐dimensional Euclidean space. The transformation matrices applied to a vertex across all poses can be thought of as a point in high dimensions. We cast the inverse LBS problem as one of finding a tight‐fitting simplex around these points (a well‐studied problem in hyperspectral imaging). Although we do not observe transformation matrices directly, the 3D position of a vertex across all of its poses defines an affine subspace, or flat. We solve a ‘closest flat’ optimization problem to find points on these flats, and then compute a minimum‐volume enclosing simplex whose vertices are the transformation matrices and whose barycentric coordinates are the skinning weights. We are able to create LBS rigs with state‐of‐the‐art reconstruction error and state‐of‐the‐art compression ratios for mesh animation sequences. Our solution does not consider weight sparsity or the rigidity of recovered transformations. We include observations and insights into the closest flat problem. Its ideal solution and optimal LBS reconstruction error remain an open problem.

     
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; et al ( , Challenges in Machine Learning Competitions for All (CiML))
    null (Ed.)
    The DeepLearningEpilepsyDetectionChallenge: design, implementation, andtestofanewcrowd-sourced AIchallengeecosystem Isabell Kiral*, Subhrajit Roy*, Todd Mummert*, Alan Braz*, Jason Tsay, Jianbin Tang, Umar Asif, Thomas Schaffter, Eren Mehmet, The IBM Epilepsy Consortium◊ , Joseph Picone, Iyad Obeid, Bruno De Assis Marques, Stefan Maetschke, Rania Khalaf†, Michal Rosen-Zvi† , Gustavo Stolovitzky† , Mahtab Mirmomeni† , Stefan Harrer† * These authors contributed equally to this work † Corresponding authors: rkhalaf@us.ibm.com, rosen@il.ibm.com, gustavo@us.ibm.com, mahtabm@au1.ibm.com, sharrer@au.ibm.com ◊ Members of the IBM Epilepsy Consortium are listed in the Acknowledgements section J. Picone and I. Obeid are with Temple University, USA. T. Schaffter is with Sage Bionetworks, USA. E. Mehmet is with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA. All other authors are with IBM Research in USA, Israel and Australia. Introduction This decade has seen an ever-growing number of scientific fields benefitting from the advances in machine learning technology and tooling. More recently, this trend reached the medical domain, with applications reaching from cancer diagnosis [1] to the development of brain-machine-interfaces [2]. While Kaggle has pioneered the crowd-sourcing of machine learning challenges to incentivise data scientists from around the world to advance algorithm and model design, the increasing complexity of problem statements demands of participants to be expert data scientists, deeply knowledgeable in at least one other scientific domain, and competent software engineers with access to large compute resources. People who match this description are few and far between, unfortunately leading to a shrinking pool of possible participants and a loss of experts dedicating their time to solving important problems. Participation is even further restricted in the context of any challenge run on confidential use cases or with sensitive data. Recently, we designed and ran a deep learning challenge to crowd-source the development of an automated labelling system for brain recordings, aiming to advance epilepsy research. A focus of this challenge, run internally in IBM, was the development of a platform that lowers the barrier of entry and therefore mitigates the risk of excluding interested parties from participating. The challenge: enabling wide participation With the goal to run a challenge that mobilises the largest possible pool of participants from IBM (global), we designed a use case around previous work in epileptic seizure prediction [3]. In this “Deep Learning Epilepsy Detection Challenge”, participants were asked to develop an automatic labelling system to reduce the time a clinician would need to diagnose patients with epilepsy. Labelled training and blind validation data for the challenge were generously provided by Temple University Hospital (TUH) [4]. TUH also devised a novel scoring metric for the detection of seizures that was used as basis for algorithm evaluation [5]. In order to provide an experience with a low barrier of entry, we designed a generalisable challenge platform under the following principles: 1. No participant should need to have in-depth knowledge of the specific domain. (i.e. no participant should need to be a neuroscientist or epileptologist.) 2. No participant should need to be an expert data scientist. 3. No participant should need more than basic programming knowledge. (i.e. no participant should need to learn how to process fringe data formats and stream data efficiently.) 4. No participant should need to provide their own computing resources. In addition to the above, our platform should further • guide participants through the entire process from sign-up to model submission, • facilitate collaboration, and • provide instant feedback to the participants through data visualisation and intermediate online leaderboards. The platform The architecture of the platform that was designed and developed is shown in Figure 1. The entire system consists of a number of interacting components. (1) A web portal serves as the entry point to challenge participation, providing challenge information, such as timelines and challenge rules, and scientific background. The portal also facilitated the formation of teams and provided participants with an intermediate leaderboard of submitted results and a final leaderboard at the end of the challenge. (2) IBM Watson Studio [6] is the umbrella term for a number of services offered by IBM. Upon creation of a user account through the web portal, an IBM Watson Studio account was automatically created for each participant that allowed users access to IBM's Data Science Experience (DSX), the analytics engine Watson Machine Learning (WML), and IBM's Cloud Object Storage (COS) [7], all of which will be described in more detail in further sections. (3) The user interface and starter kit were hosted on IBM's Data Science Experience platform (DSX) and formed the main component for designing and testing models during the challenge. DSX allows for real-time collaboration on shared notebooks between team members. A starter kit in the form of a Python notebook, supporting the popular deep learning libraries TensorFLow [8] and PyTorch [9], was provided to all teams to guide them through the challenge process. Upon instantiation, the starter kit loaded necessary python libraries and custom functions for the invisible integration with COS and WML. In dedicated spots in the notebook, participants could write custom pre-processing code, machine learning models, and post-processing algorithms. The starter kit provided instant feedback about participants' custom routines through data visualisations. Using the notebook only, teams were able to run the code on WML, making use of a compute cluster of IBM's resources. The starter kit also enabled submission of the final code to a data storage to which only the challenge team had access. (4) Watson Machine Learning provided access to shared compute resources (GPUs). Code was bundled up automatically in the starter kit and deployed to and run on WML. WML in turn had access to shared storage from which it requested recorded data and to which it stored the participant's code and trained models. (5) IBM's Cloud Object Storage held the data for this challenge. Using the starter kit, participants could investigate their results as well as data samples in order to better design custom algorithms. (6) Utility Functions were loaded into the starter kit at instantiation. This set of functions included code to pre-process data into a more common format, to optimise streaming through the use of the NutsFlow and NutsML libraries [10], and to provide seamless access to the all IBM services used. Not captured in the diagram is the final code evaluation, which was conducted in an automated way as soon as code was submitted though the starter kit, minimising the burden on the challenge organising team. Figure 1: High-level architecture of the challenge platform Measuring success The competitive phase of the "Deep Learning Epilepsy Detection Challenge" ran for 6 months. Twenty-five teams, with a total number of 87 scientists and software engineers from 14 global locations participated. All participants made use of the starter kit we provided and ran algorithms on IBM's infrastructure WML. Seven teams persisted until the end of the challenge and submitted final solutions. The best performing solutions reached seizure detection performances which allow to reduce hundred-fold the time eliptologists need to annotate continuous EEG recordings. Thus, we expect the developed algorithms to aid in the diagnosis of epilepsy by significantly shortening manual labelling time. Detailed results are currently in preparation for publication. Equally important to solving the scientific challenge, however, was to understand whether we managed to encourage participation from non-expert data scientists. Figure 2: Primary occupation as reported by challenge participants Out of the 40 participants for whom we have occupational information, 23 reported Data Science or AI as their main job description, 11 reported being a Software Engineer, and 2 people had expertise in Neuroscience. Figure 2 shows that participants had a variety of specialisations, including some that are in no way related to data science, software engineering, or neuroscience. No participant had deep knowledge and experience in data science, software engineering and neuroscience. Conclusion Given the growing complexity of data science problems and increasing dataset sizes, in order to solve these problems, it is imperative to enable collaboration between people with differences in expertise with a focus on inclusiveness and having a low barrier of entry. We designed, implemented, and tested a challenge platform to address exactly this. Using our platform, we ran a deep-learning challenge for epileptic seizure detection. 87 IBM employees from several business units including but not limited to IBM Research with a variety of skills, including sales and design, participated in this highly technical challenge. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email