skip to main content


Title: Transcriptome and phenotyping analyses support a role for chloroplast sigma factor 2 in red‐light‐dependent regulation of growth, stress, and photosynthesis
Abstract

Sigma factor (SIG) proteins contribute to promoter specificity of the plastid‐encodedRNApolymerase during chloroplast genome transcription. All six members of theSIGfamily, that is,SIG1–SIG6, are nuclear‐encoded proteins targeted to chloroplasts. Sigma factor 2 (SIG2) is a phytochrome‐regulated protein important for stoichiometric control of the expression of plastid‐ and nuclear‐encoded genes that impact plastid development and plant growth and development. AmongSIGfactors,SIG2 is required not only for transcription of chloroplast genes (i.e., anterograde signaling), but also impacts nuclear‐encoded, photosynthesis‐related, and light signaling‐related genes (i.e., retrograde signaling) in response to plastid functional status. AlthoughSIG2 is involved in photomorphogenesis in Arabidopsis, the molecular bases for its role in light signaling that impacts photomorphogenesis and aspects of photosynthesis have only recently begun to be investigated. Previously, we reported thatSIG2 is necessary for phytochrome‐mediated photomorphogenesis specifically under red (R) and far‐red light, thereby suggesting a link between phytochromes and nuclear‐encodedSIG2 in light signaling. To explore transcriptional roles ofSIG2 in R‐dependent growth and development, we performedRNAsequencing analysis to compare gene expression insig2‐2mutant and Col‐0 wild‐type seedlings at two developmental stages (1‐ and 7‐day). We identified a subset of misregulated genes involved in growth, hormonal cross talk, stress responses, and photosynthesis. To investigate the functional relevance of these gene expression analyses, we performed several comparative phenotyping tests. In these analyses, strongsig2mutants showed insensitivity to bioactiveGA3, high intracellular levels of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) indicative of a stress response, and specific defects in photosynthesis, including elevated levels of cyclic electron flow (CEF) and nonphotochemical quenching (NPQ). We demonstrated thatSIG2 regulates a broader range of physiological responses at the molecular level than previously reported, with specific roles in red‐light‐mediated photomorphogenesis.

 
more » « less
NSF-PAR ID:
10053869
Author(s) / Creator(s):
 ;  ;  ;  ;  
Publisher / Repository:
Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Plant Direct
Volume:
2
Issue:
2
ISSN:
2475-4455
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Premise

    Light is critical in the ability of plants to accumulate chlorophyll. When exposed to far‐red (FR) light and then grown in white light in the absence of sucrose, wild‐type seedlings fail to green in a response known as theFRblock of greening (BOG). This response is controlled by phytochrome A through repression of protochlorophyllide reductase‐encoding (POR) genes byFRlight coupled with irreversible plastid damage. Sigma (SIG) factors are nuclear‐encoded proteins that contribute to plant greening and plastid development through regulating gene transcription in chloroplasts and impacting retrograde signaling from the plastid to nucleus.SIGs are regulated by phytochromes, and the expression of someSIGfactors is reduced in phytochrome mutant lines, including phyA. Given the association of phyA with theFR BOGand its regulation ofSIGfactors, we investigated the potential regulatory role ofSIGfactors in theFR BOGresponse.

    Methods

    We examinedFR BOGresponses insigmutants, phytochrome‐deficient lines, and mutant lines for several phy‐associated factors. We quantified chlorophyll levels and examined expression of keyBOG‐associated genes.

    Results

    Among sixsigmutants, only thesig6 mutant significantly accumulated chlorophyll afterFR BOGtreatment, similar to thephyAmutant.SIG6 appears to control protochlorophyllide accumulation by contributing to the regulation of tetrapyrrole biosynthesis associated with glutamyl‐tRNAreductase (HEMA1) function, select phytochrome‐interacting factor genes (PIF4andPIF6), andPENTA1, which regulatesPORAmRNAtranslation afterFRexposure.

    Conclusions

    Regulation ofSIG6plays a significant role in plant responses toFRexposure during theBOGresponse.

     
    more » « less
  2. Abstract

    Light initiates chloroplast biogenesis by activating photosynthesis-associated genes encoded by not only the nuclear but also the plastidial genome, but how photoreceptors control plastidial gene expression remains enigmatic. Here we show that the photoactivation of phytochromes triggers the expression of photosynthesis-associated plastid-encoded genes (PhAPGs) by stimulating the assembly of the bacterial-type plastidial RNA polymerase (PEP) into a 1000-kDa complex. Using forward genetic approaches, we identified REGULATOR OF CHLOROPLAST BIOGENESIS (RCB) as a dual-targeted nuclear/plastidial phytochrome signaling component required for PEP assembly. Surprisingly, RCB controlsPhAPGexpression primarily from the nucleus by interacting with phytochromes and promoting their localization to photobodies for the degradation of the transcriptional regulators PIF1 and PIF3. RCB-dependent PIF degradation in the nucleus signals the plastids for PEP assembly andPhAPGexpression. Thus, our findings reveal the framework of a nucleus-to-plastid anterograde signaling pathway by which phytochrome signaling in the nucleus controls plastidial transcription.

     
    more » « less
  3. Abstract

    Light initiates chloroplast biogenesis inArabidopsisby eliminating PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING transcription FACTORs (PIFs), which in turn de-represses nuclear photosynthesis genes, and synchronously, generates a nucleus-to-plastid (anterograde) signal that activates the plastid-encoded bacterial-type RNA polymerase (PEP) to transcribe plastid photosynthesis genes. However, the identity of the anterograde signal remains frustratingly elusive. The main challenge has been the difficulty to distinguish regulators from the plethora of necessary components for plastid transcription and other essential chloroplast functions, such as photosynthesis. Here, we show that the genome-wide induction of nuclear photosynthesis genes is insufficient to activate the PEP. PEP inhibition is imposed redundantly by multiple PIFs and requires PIF3’s activator activity. Among the nuclear-encoded components of the PEP holoenzyme, we identify four light-inducible, PIF-repressed sigma factors as anterograde signals. Together, our results elucidate that light-dependent inhibition of PIFs activates plastid photosynthesis genes via sigma factors as anterograde signals in parallel with the induction of nuclear photosynthesis genes.

     
    more » « less
  4. Abstract

    Phytochromes initiate chloroplast biogenesis by activating genes encoding the photosynthetic apparatus, including photosynthesis-associated plastid-encoded genes (PhAPGs).PhAPGs are transcribed by a bacterial-type RNA polymerase (PEP), but how phytochromes in the nucleus activate chloroplast gene expression remains enigmatic. We report here a forward genetic screen inArabidopsisthat identified NUCLEAR CONTROL OF PEP ACTIVITY (NCP) as a necessary component of phytochrome signaling forPhAPGactivation. NCP is dual-targeted to plastids and the nucleus. While nuclear NCP mediates the degradation of two repressors of chloroplast biogenesis, PIF1 and PIF3, NCP in plastids promotes the assembly of the PEP complex forPhAPGtranscription. NCP and its paralog RCB are non-catalytic thioredoxin-like proteins that diverged in seed plants to adopt nonredundant functions in phytochrome signaling. These results support a model in which phytochromes controlPhAPGexpression through light-dependent double nuclear and plastidial switches that are linked by evolutionarily conserved and dual-localized regulatory proteins.

     
    more » « less
  5. Summary

    Light signal provides the spatial and temporal information for plants to adapt to the prevailing environmental conditions. Alterations in light quality and quantity can trigger robust changes in global gene expression. InArabidopsis thaliana, two groups of key factors regulating those changes in gene expression areCONSTITUTIVE PHOTOMORPHOGENESIS/DEETIOLATED/FUSCA(COP/DET/FUS) and a subset of basic helix‐loop‐helix transcription factors calledPHYTOCHROMEINTERACTING FACTORS(PIFs). Recently, rapid progress has been made in characterizing the E3 ubiquitin ligases for the light‐induced degradation ofPIF1,PIF3 andPIF4; however, the E3 ligase(s) forPIF5 remains unknown. Here, we show that theCUL4COP1–SPAcomplex is necessary for the red light‐induced degradation ofPIF5. Furthermore,COP1 andSPAproteins stabilizePIF5 in the dark, but promote the ubiquitination and degradation ofPIF5 in response to red light through the 26S proteasome pathway. Genetic analysis illustrates that overexpression ofPIF5can partially suppress bothcop1‐4andspaQseedling de‐etiolation phenotypes under dark and red‐light conditions. In addition, thePIF5 protein level cycles under both diurnal and constant light conditions, which is also defective in thecop1‐4andspaQbackgrounds. Bothcop1‐4andspaQshow defects in diurnal growth pattern. Overexpression ofPIF5partially restores growth defects incop1‐4andspaQunder diurnal conditions, suggesting that theCOP1–SPAcomplex plays an essential role in photoperiodic hypocotyl growth, partly through regulating thePIF5 level. Taken together, our data illustrate how theCUL4COP1–SPAE3 ligase dynamically controls thePIF5 level to regulate plant development.

     
    more » « less