More Like this

1. Importin α/β promote Kif18B microtubule association and enhance microtubule destabilization activity

   https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E22-03-0113  

   Shrestha, Sanjay; Ems-McClung, Stephanie C.; Hazelbaker, Mark A.; Yount, Amber L.; Shaw, Sidney L.; Walczak, Claire E. (April 2023, Molecular Biology of the Cell)

   Wignall, Sarah (Ed.)

   Tight regulation of microtubule (MT) dynamics is necessary for proper spindle assembly and chromosome segregation. The MT destabilizing Kinesin-8, Kif18B, controls astral MT dynamics and spindle positioning. Kif18B interacts with importin α/β as well as with the plus-tip tracking protein EB1, but how these associations modulate Kif18B is not known. We mapped the key binding sites on Kif18B, made residue-specific mutations, and assessed their impact on Kif18B function. Blocking EB1 interaction disrupted Kif18B MT plus-end accumulation and inhibited its ability to control MT length on monopolar spindles in cells. Blocking importin α/β interaction disrupted Kif18B localization without affecting aster size. In vitro, importin α/β increased Kif18B MT association by increasing the on-rate and decreasing the off-rate from MTs, which stimulated MT destabilization. In contrast, EB1 promoted MT destabilization without increasing lattice binding in vitro, which suggests that EB1 and importin α/β have distinct roles in the regulation of Kif18B-mediated MT destabilization. We propose that importin α/β spatially modulate Kif18B association with MTs to facilitate its MT destabilization activity. Our results suggest that Ran regulation is important not only to control molecular motor function near chromatin but also to provide a spatial control mechanism to modulate MT binding of nuclear localization signal–containing spindle assembly factors. 

   more » « less
2. Importin α/β promote Kif18B microtubule association and enhance microtubule destabilization activity

   Sanjay Shrestha 1, Stephanie C (March 2023, Molecular biology of the cell)

   Tight regulation of microtubule (MT) dynamics is necessary for proper spindle assembly and chromosome segregation. The MT destabilizing Kinesin-8, Kif18B, controls astral MT dynamics and spindle positioning. Kif18B interacts with importin α/β as well as with the plus-tip tracking protein EB1, but how these associations modulate Kif18B is not known. We mapped the key binding sites on Kif18B, made residue-specific mutations, and assessed their impact on Kif18B function. Blocking EB1 interaction disrupted Kif18B MT plus-end accumulation and inhibited its ability to control MT length on monopolar spindles in cells. Blocking importin α/β interaction disrupted Kif18B localization without affecting aster size. In vitro, importin α/β increased Kif18B MT association by increasing the on-rate and decreasing the off-rate from MTs, which stimulated MT destabilization. In contrast, EB1 promoted MT destabilization without increasing lattice binding in vitro, which suggests that EB1 and importin α/β have distinct roles in the regulation of Kif18B-mediated MT destabilization. We propose that importin α/β spatially modulate Kif18B association with MTs to facilitate its MT destabilization activity. Our results suggest that Ran regulation is important not only to control molecular motor function near chromatin but also to provide a spatial control mechanism to modulate MT binding of nuclear localization signal-containing spindle assembly factors. 

   more » « less
3. Processivity vs. Beating: Comparing Cytoplasmic and Axonemal Dynein Microtubule Binding Domain Association with Microtubule

   https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20051090  

   Tajielyato, Nayere; Alexov, Emil (March 2019, International Journal of Molecular Sciences)

   This study compares the role of electrostatics in the binding process between microtubules and two dynein microtubule-binding domains (MTBDs): cytoplasmic and axonemal. These two dyneins are distinctively different in terms of their functionalities: cytoplasmic dynein is processive, while axonemal dynein is involved in beating. In both cases, the binding requires frequent association/disassociation between the microtubule and MTBD, and involves highly negatively charged microtubules, including non-structured C-terminal domains (E-hooks), and an MTBD interface that is positively charged. This indicates that electrostatics play an important role in the association process. Here, we show that the cytoplasmic MTBD binds electrostatically tighter to microtubules than to the axonemal MTBD, but the axonemal MTBD experiences interactions with microtubule E-hooks at longer distances compared with the cytoplasmic MTBD. This allows the axonemal MTBD to be weakly bound to the microtubule, while at the same time acting onto the microtubule via the flexible E-hooks, even at MTBD–microtubule distances of 45 Å. In part, this is due to the charge distribution of MTBDs: in the cytoplasmic MTBD, the positive charges are concentrated at the binding interface with the microtubule, while in the axonemal MTBD, they are more distributed over the entire structure, allowing E-hooks to interact at longer distances. The dissimilarities of electrostatics in the cases of axonemal and cytoplasmic MTBDs were found not to result in a difference in conformational dynamics on MTBDs, while causing differences in the conformational states of E-hooks. The E-hooks’ conformations in the presence of the axonemal MTBD were less restricted than in the presence of the cytoplasmic MTBD. In parallel with the differences, the common effect was found that the structural fluctuations of MTBDs decrease as either the number of contacts with E-hooks increases or the distance to the microtubule decreases. 

   more » « less
4. Self-Assembly of Microtubule Tactoids

   https://doi.org/10.3791/63952  

   Chauhan, Prashali; Sahu, Sumon; Goodbee, Niaz; Martin, Sophia; Lee, Hong Beom; Branch, Ruell; Schwarz, Jennifer M.; Ross, Jennifer L. (January 2022, Journal of Visualized Experiments)
5. Sorting out microtubule-based transport

   https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-020-00320-y  

   Yildiz, Ahmet (February 2021, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology)