Easily establishing pairing between Internet-of-Things (IoT) devices is important for fast deployment in many smart home scenarios. Traditional pairing methods, including passkey, QR code, and RFID, often require specific user interfaces, surface’s shape/material, or additional tags/readers. The growing number of low-resource IoT devices without an interface may not meet these requirements, which makes their pairing a challenge. On the other hand, these devices often already have sensors embedded for sensing tasks, such as inertial sensors. These sensors can be used for limited user interaction with the devices, but are not suitable for pairing on their own.
In this paper, we present UniverSense, an alternative pairing method between low-resource IoT devices with an inertial sensor and a more powerful networked device equipped with a camera. To establish pairing between them, the user moves the low-resource IoT device in front of the camera. Both the camera and the on-device sensors capture the physical motion of the low-resource device. UniverSense converts these signals into a common state-space to generate fingerprints for pairing. We conduct real-world experiments to evaluate UniverSense and it achieves an F1 score of 99.9% in experiments carried out by five participants.
more »
« less
Device attestation: Past, present, and future
In recent years we have seen a rise in popularity of networked devices. From traffic signals in a city’s busiest intersection and energy metering appliances, to internet-connected security cameras, these embedded devices have become entrenched in everyday life. As a consequence, a need to ensure secure and reliable operation of these devices has also risen. Device attestation is a promising solution to the operational demands of embedded devices, especially those widely used in Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical System.
In this paper, we summarize the basics of device attestation. We then present a summary of attestation approaches by classifying them based on their functionality and reliability guarantees they provide to networked devices. Lastly, we discuss the limitations and potential issues current mechanisms exhibit and propose new research directions.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1802701
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10064958
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE)
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 473 to 478
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Recent advances in model piracy have uncovered a new security hole for malicious attacks endangering the Intellectual Property (IP) of Deep Learning (DL) systems. This manuscript features our research titled “DeepAttest: An End-toEnd Attestation Framework for Deep Neural Networks” [1] that is selected for the 2021 Top Picks in hardware and embedded security. DeepAttest is the first end-to-end framework that achieves reliable and efficient IP protection of DL devices with hardware-bounded usage control. We leverage device-specific model fingerprinting and Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) to ensure that only DL models with the device-specific fingerprint can run inference on protected hardwaremore » « less
-
Internet of Things (IoT) devices and applications can have significant vulnerabilities, which may be exploited by adversaries to cause considerable harm. An important approach for mitigating this threat is remote attestation, which enables the defender to remotely verify the integrity of devices and their software. There are a number of approaches for remote attestation, and each has its unique advantages and disadvantages in terms of detection accuracy and computational cost. Further, an attestation method may be applied in multiple ways, such as various lev- els of software coverage. Therefore, to minimize both security risks and computational overhead, defenders need to decide strategically which attestation methods to apply and how to apply them, depending on the characteristic of the devices and the potential losses. To answer these questions, we first develop a testbed for remote attestation of IoT devices, which enables us to measure the detection accuracy and performance overhead of various attestation methods. Our testbed integrates two example IoT applications, memory-checksum based attestation, and a variety of software vulnerabilities that allow adversaries to inject arbitrary code into running applications. Second, we model the problem of finding an optimal strategy for applying remote attestation as a Stackelberg security game between a defender and an adversary. We characterize the defender’s optimal attestation strategy in a variety of special cases. Finally, building on experimental results from our testbed, we evaluate our model and show that optimal strategic attestation can lead to significantly lower losses than naive baseline strategies.more » « less
-
Remote attestation (RA) is a means of malware detection, typically realized as an interaction between a trusted verifier and a potentially compromised remote device (prover). RA is especially relevant for low-end embedded devices that are incapable of protecting themselves against malware infection. Most current RA techniques require on-demand and uninterruptible (atomic) operation. The former fails to detect transient malware that enters and leaves between successive RA instances; the latter involves performing potentially time-consuming computation over prover's memory and/or storage, which can be harmful to the device's safety-critical functionality and general availability. However, relaxing either on-demand or atomic RA operation is tricky and prone to vulnerabilities. This paper identifies some issues that arise in reconciling requirements of safety-critical operation with those of secure remote attestation, including detection of transient and self-relocating malware. It also investigates mitigation techniques, including periodic self-measurements as well as interruptible attestation modality that involves shuffled memory traversals and various memory locking mechanisms.more » « less
-
Guaranteeing runtime integrity of embedded system software is an open problem. Trade-offs between security and other priorities (e.g., cost or performance) are inherent, and resolving them is both challenging and important. The proliferation of runtime attacks that introduce malicious code (e.g., by injection) into embedded devices has prompted a range of mitigation techniques. One popular approach is Remote Attestation (RA), whereby a trusted entity (verifier) checks the current software state of an untrusted remote device (prover). RA yields a timely authenticated snapshot of prover state that verifier uses to decide whether an attack occurred. Current RA schemes require verifier to explicitly initiate RA, based on some unclear criteria. Thus, in case of prover's compromise, verifier only learns about it late, upon the next RA instance. While sufficient for compromise detection, some applications would benefit from a more proactive, prevention-based approach. To this end, we construct CASU: Compromise Avoidance via Secure Updates. CASU is an inexpensive hardware/software co-design enforcing: (i) runtime software immutability, thus precluding any illegal software modification, and (ii) authenticated updates as the sole means of modifying software. In CASU, a successful RA instance serves as a proof of successful update, and continuous subsequent software integrity is implicit, due to the runtime immutability guarantee. This obviates the need for RA in between software updates and leads to unobtrusive integrity assurance with guarantees akin to those of prior RA techniques, with better overall performance.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- https://doi.org/10.23919/DATE.2018.8342055
