Wild Bornean orangutans experience fluctuations in the availability of their preferred food, fruit. During periods of low fruit availability, orangutans rely on fallback foods which are expected to be higher in fiber and generally lower in free simple sugars. However, it is not clear whether there is a consistent relationship between fiber content and the content of other nutrients. Here, we examine acid detergent fiber (ADF) content of 101 plant foods consumed by orangutans in Gunung Palung National Park, West Kalimantan, Indonesia, and the correlation between ADF and other important plant macronutrients. Samples were collected during full-day behavioral follows between 1994-2001. Samples were analyzed in triplicate through a reflux apparatus, which quantified ADF proportion by weight. An ANOVA revealed significant differences between ADF concentrations of different plant parts (F(5)=20.89, p < 0.001). Post-hoc analyses (α= 0.005) determined that bark had a significantly higher ADF concentration than pulp and seeds (p<0.001), leaves had a significantly higher ADF concentration than seeds (p<0.001), and whole fruit had a significantly higher ADF concentration than pulp or seeds (p<0.001). We found a negative correlation between free simple sugar concentration and ADF (R = -0.63, p<0.001). However, there was no significant correlation between ADF and protein (R=-0.14, p=0.17) or lipid (R 0.134, p=0.19) content. Our findings corroborate work showing that bark and leaves are particularly high in ADF. However, they underscore the fact that determining dietary quality is complex, and that food items that are high in fiber may still be good sources of non-carbohydrate energy.
National Science Foundation (BCS-1638823, BCS-0936199, 1540360, 9414388); National Geographic Society; US Fish and Wildlife (F15AP00812, F12AP00369, 98210-8-G661); Leakey Foundation; Disney Wildlife Conservation Fund; Wenner-Gren Foundation; Nacey-Maggioncalda Foundation; Conservation, Food and Health
more »
« less
Quantifying free simple sugars in orangutan foods using spectrophotometry: Implications for orangutan feeding ecology
Orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii) in
Gunung Palung National Park, West Kalimantan,
Indonesia experience significant seasonal and
annual fluctuations in the availability of their
preferred food, ripe fruit. When ripe fruit is limited,
orangutans increase their consumption of bark,
pith, and leaves, which are continuously available
and may act as fallback foods. While these
foods are presumed to be less nutritious, it is not
clear whether this is the case. Free simple sugars
(FSS) provide orangutans with readily-metabolizable
energy, and are thus an important nutritional
compound for food choice. Here, we examine
FSS concentrations in a variety of orangutan
foods (n=54) to better understand orangutan
foraging and nutritional ecology. We predicted
that preferred foods would have higher concentrations
of FSS than fallback foods.
We analyzed FSS concentrations using a modified
phenol-sulfuric acid method, and tested
sample absorbency using a spectrophotometer
at 490 nm. We analyzed 54 samples from 48
species, examining six plant parts: bark, flowers,
leaves, pulp, seeds, and skin/pulp. Although
preliminary results indicated no statistically significant
differences in sugar content across the six
food categories (F(5,47)=1.78, p=0.14), we did
find that preferred foods (fruit pulp and seeds)
had an average sugar concentration that was significantly higher (4.7%) than fallback foods
(leaves and bark) (t=2.355, p=0.04).
Therefore, as predicted, we find that orangutans
prefer food types with higher concentrations of
FSS. Obtaining adequate caloric and nutritional
intake is crucial for orangutan reproduction
and development, and thus this study provides
new insight into what drives orangutan dietary
choices.
National Science Foundation (BCS-1638823,
BCS-0936199, 9414388), National Geographic Society,
US Fish and Wildlife (F15AP00812, F12AP00369,
98210-8-G661), Leakey Foundation, Disney Wildlife
Conservation Fund, Wenner-Gren Foundation, Nacey-
Maggioncalda Foundation.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1638823
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10067614
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- 87th Annual Meeting of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 228
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
null (Ed.)In 2015, Lambert and Rothman urged primate nutritional ecologists to revise the view of fallback and optimal foods from stable traits inherent in the food to variable qualities determined by the state of the consumer. Here we provide behavioral evidence to support this revision. In primates, fruit is often the preferred food category because it is typically high-energy, high-carbohydrate, and low in fiber. Orangutans in particular, are said to consume fruit preferentially and when it is available, whereas leaves, bark, and pith are often considered fallback foods. Using movement ecology, we ask if wild Bornean orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii) navigate only to fruit, or whether navigation to non-fruit foods is supported by our data. We find that orangutans do deviate from a direct fruit-to-fruit path to consume non-fruit foods (n = 54, range 8% - 84%; p = 6.819e-07.) Next, we ask if orangutans consume non-fruit foods when in the proximity of fruit resources. We find that 25.5% of the time that orangutans eat a non-fruit food, there is an available fruit within 50m (n=308). Building on previous research finding that orangutans maintain a 10.1:1 NPE:P balance, we use this geospatial data showing that orangutans navigate to and choose non-fruit foods, even when fruit is available, to suggest that orangutans are seeking foods based on their current nutritional state and not only to maximize energy. This supports the claim that 'fallback' is not an inherent characteristic of a food, but rather is in the state-dependent eye of the consumer. Funders: National Science Foundation (BCS-1638823; BCS-1613393), NSF GRFP (DGE-1247312); Boston University; National Geographic Society, US Fish and Wildlife (F15AP00812), Leakey Foundation, Disney Wildlife Conservation Fund; Wenner-Gren Foundation; Nacey-Maggioncalda Foundation, Princeton Universitymore » « less
-
null (Ed.)In 2015, Lambert and Rothman urged primate nutritional ecologists to revise the view of fallback and optimal foods from stable traits inherent in the food to variable qualities determined by the state of the consumer. Here we provide behavioral evidence to support this revision. In primates, fruit is often the preferred food category because it is typically high-energy, high-carbohydrate, and low in fiber. Orangutans in particular, are said to consume fruit preferentially and when it is available, whereas leaves, bark, and pith are often considered fallback foods. Using movement ecology, we ask if wild Bornean orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii) navigate only to fruit, or whether navigation to non-fruit foods is supported by our data. We find that orangutans do deviate from a direct fruit-to-fruit path to consume non-fruit foods (n = 54, range 8% - 84%; p = 6.819e-07.) Next, we ask if orangutans consume non-fruit foods when in the proximity of fruit resources. We find that 25.5% of the time that orangutans eat a non-fruit food, there is an available fruit within 50m (n=308). Building on previous research finding that orangutans maintain a 10.1:1 NPE:P balance, we use this geospatial data showing that orangutans navigate to and choose non-fruit foods, even when fruit is available, to suggest that orangutans are seeking foods based on their current nutritional state and not only to maximize energy. This supports the claim that 'fallback' is not an inherent characteristic of a food, but rather is in the state-dependent eye of the consumer. Funders: National Science Foundation (BCS-1638823; BCS-1613393), NSF GRFP (DGE-1247312); Boston University; National Geographic Society, US Fish and Wildlife (F15AP00812), Leakey Foundation, Disney Wildlife Conservation Fund; Wenner-Gren Foundation; Nacey-Maggioncalda Foundation, Princeton Universitymore » « less
-
Orangutan habitats are characterized by fluctuations in the availability of ripe fruits. During non-fruiting periods orangutans typically incorporate more lower-quality foods such as pith and bark in their diet. Condensed tannins (CT) are secondary plant compounds that bind to proteins, thus impeding the digestibility of proteins, and tending to make foods bitter or unpalatable. We analyzed condensed tannin content in 129 plant samples collected from Gunung Palung National Park in Borneo, Indonesia between 1994 and 2001. We predicted that CT concentrations would be highest in bark, and that there would be a correlation between protein and condensed tannin content. We used ANOVA with Bonferonni’s method for post-hoc comparisons to test for differences in 11tannin content between plant parts, and Pearson’s correlation to test for relationships between tannin concentrations and other nutrients. There were significant differences in condensed tannin content (F(¬4)=2.70, p=0.03) but no differences after adjusting the alpha-level for post-hoc comparisons. Whole fruit (including the skin) tended to have the highest CT concentration. However, we found no correlation between CT and concentration of nutrients including crude protein (R=0.12, p=0.19, N=127), free simple sugars (R=-0.09, p=0.40, N=100), or fiber (R=-0.38, p=0.67, N=128). This underscores that plants rich in desirable nutrients may also be rich in antifeedants, posing challenges for orangutan consumption and digestion even as they provide a source of high-quality energy. Additionally, for some food categories where high tannin content is predicted, such as bark, orangutans may be choosing to eat species that are lower in these compounds. Funders: Boston University Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program, NSF (BCS-1638823, BCS-0936199); National Geographic; USFish/Wildlife (F18AP00898, F15AP00812, F13AP00920, 96200-0-G249, 96200-9-G110, 9414388); Leakey; Disney Wildlife Conservation; Wenner-Gren; Nacey-Maggioncalda; Orangutan Conservancy; Conservation, Food, and Health Foundation.more » « less
-
Bornean orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii) preferentially eat pulp and mesocarp when fleshy fruit is abundant. However, during non-masting periods, orangutans rely on foods that can be mechanically challenging, including leaves, woody plant tissue, and seeds. Although adult orangutans’ jaws are well adapted for intense and, perhaps, repetitive loading during chewing, it may be easier for flanged adult males to process tough or hard foods than for adult females because of dramatic sexual dimorphism. Here, we use video data and in situ focalobservations from Gunung Palung National Park, West Kalimantan, Indonesia to test the hypotheses that orangutans exhibit food- and sex-specific oral processing profiles. Pilot data (n=94 feeding bouts; 76 adult females, 18 adult males) suggest no significant differences in use of incisors (F(3,71)=0.41, p=0.75), canines (F(3,71)=0.78, p=0.52), or molars (F(3,71)=0.88, p=0.46) per ingestive action while processing fruit, leaves, termites, or bark. Females used significantly more incisions per ingestive action (2.20) than males (1.01) (t=2.44, p=0.008), and, though differences were not significant, performed more canine bites (female mean=0.08, male mean=0.00, p=0.17) and mastications (female mean=4.88, male mean=3.95, p=0.24) per ingestive action than males. We detected no difference in the behaviors used by orangutans to process different food types, despite great variation in food mechanical properties. However, this may be because our pilot data did not capture the range of mechanical challenges in orangutan diets. Nevertheless, our preliminary results support the hypothesis that adult females work harder than flanged males during oral food processing, explicable due to sexual dimorphism. National Science Foundation (BCS-1638823, BCS-0936199); National Geographic Society; US Fish and Wildlife (F15AP00812, F12AP00369, 98210-8- G661); Leakey Foundation; Disney Wildlife Conservation Fund; Wenner-Gren Foundation; Nacey-Maggioncalda Foundationmore » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- The DOI is not currently available.
