An official website of the United States government
Abstract. In this paper, an Eulerian two-phase flow model, sedFoam, is extended to include an air phase together with its water and sediment phases. The numerical model called sedInterFoam is implemented using the open-source library OpenFOAM. sedInterFoam includes the previous features of sedFoam for sediment transport modeling and also solves the air–water interface using the volume-of-fluid method coupled with the waves2Foam toolbox for free-surface wave generation and absorption. Using sedInterFoam, four test cases are successfully reproduced to validate the free-surface evolution algorithm's implementation, mass conservation of sediment and fluid phases, and predictive capabilities and to demonstrate its potential in modeling a broader range of coastal applications with sediment transport dominated by surface waves.
more »
« less
SedFoam-2.0: a 3-D two-phase flow numerical model for sediment transport
Abstract. In this paper, a three-dimensional two-phase flow solver, SedFoam-2.0, is presented for sediment transport applications. The solver is extended from twoPhaseEulerFoam available in the 2.1.0 release of the open-source CFD (computational fluid dynamics) toolbox OpenFOAM. In this approach the sediment phase is modeled as a continuum, and constitutive laws have to be prescribed for the sediment stresses. In the proposed solver, two different intergranular stress models are implemented: the kinetic theory of granular flows and the dense granular flow rheology μ(I). For the fluid stress, laminar or turbulent flow regimes can be simulated and three different turbulence models are available for sediment transport: a simple mixing length model (one-dimensional configuration only), a k − ε, and a k − ω model. The numerical implementation is demonstrated on four test cases: sedimentation of suspended particles, laminar bed load, sheet flow, and scour at an apron. These test cases illustrate the capabilities of SedFoam-2.0 to deal with complex turbulent sediment transport problems with different combinations of intergranular stress and turbulence models.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1635151
- PAR ID:
- 10073441
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Geoscientific Model Development
- Volume:
- 10
- Issue:
- 12
- ISSN:
- 1991-9603
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 4367 to 4392
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract. In this paper, an Eulerian two-phase-flow model sedFoam is extended to include an air phase together with the water and sediment phases. The numerical model called sedInterFoam is implemented using the open source library OpenFOAM. SedInterFoam includes the previous features of sedFoam for sediment transport modeling and also solves the air/water interface using the volume of fluid method coupled with the waves2Foam toolbox for free surface wave generation and absorption. Using sedInterFoam, four test cases are successfully reproduced to validate the free-surface evolution algorithm implementation, mass conservation of sediment and fluid phases, predictive capabilities and demonstrate its potential in modelling a broader range of coastal applications with sediment transport dominated by surface waves.more » « less
-
A three-dimensional Eulerian two-phase flow solver, SedFoam, has been developed for various sediment transport applications. The solver has demonstrated success in modeling sheet flow and bedforms driven by oscillatory flows using a Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) formulation. However, the accuracy of the RANS formulation for more complex flows, such as scour around structures, requires further evaluation. SedFoam has recently been enhanced to incorporate two-phase large-eddy simulation (LES) capability. In this study, RANS and LES approaches are tested via a three-dimensional case of wave-induced local scour around a single vertical circular pile. Two laboratory experiments, one with an erodible bed and the other with a rigid bed, were chosen for simulation, with both experiments having a Keulegan-Carpenter (KC) number of 10. The k-ω turbulence closure was selected for the RANS simulation, and the dynamic Lagrangian subgrid closure was chosen for the LES simulation. Numerical results reveal that both RANS and LES simulations can resolve lee-wake vortices, although the vortices are significantly weaker in the RANS simulation. In comparison with the LES results, the RANS approach fails to predict horseshoe vortex with sufficient intensity, leading to an underestimation of scour hole depth development. Although the scour depths develop at a very similar rate in the early stage, the scour depth predicted by the RANS simulation quickly reaches equilibrium, while the LES simulation follows the measured trend. These findings indicate that a turbulence-resolving methodology, i.e. LES, is necessary for accurate scour simulations.more » « less
-
One of the key factors in simulating realistic wall-bounded flows at high Reynolds numbers is the selection of an appropriate turbulence model for the steady Reynolds Averaged Navier–Stokes equations (RANS) equations. In this investigation, the performance of several turbulence models was explored for the simulation of steady, compressible, turbulent flow on complex geometries (concave and convex surface curvatures) and unstructured grids. The turbulence models considered were the Spalart–Allmaras model, the Wilcox k- ω model and the Menter shear stress transport (SST) model. The FLITE3D flow solver was employed, which utilizes a stabilized finite volume method with discontinuity capturing. A numerical benchmarking of the different models was performed for classical Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) cases, such as supersonic flow over an isothermal flat plate, transonic flow over the RAE2822 airfoil, the ONERA M6 wing and a generic F15 aircraft configuration. Validation was performed by means of available experimental data from the literature as well as high spatial/temporal resolution Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS). For attached or mildly separated flows, the performance of all turbulence models was consistent. However, the contrary was observed in separated flows with recirculation zones. Particularly, the Menter SST model showed the best compromise between accurately describing the physics of the flow and numerical stability.more » « less
-
Turbulent boundary layers subject to severe acceleration or strong favorable pressure gradient (FPG) are of fundamental and technological importance. Scientifically, they elicit great interest from the points of view of scaling laws, the complex interaction between the outer and inner regions, and the quasi-laminarization phenomenon. Many flows of industrial and technological applications are subject to strong acceleration such as convergent ducts, turbines blades and nozzles. Our recent numerical predictions (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 775, pp. 189-200, 2015) of turbulent boundary layers subject to very strong FPG with high spatial/temporal resolution, i.e. Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS), have shown a meaningful weakening of the Reynolds shear stresses with an evident logarithmic behavior. In the present study, assessment of three different turbulence models (Shear Stress Transport, k-w and Spalart-Allmaras, henceforth SST, k-w and SA, respectively) in Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations is performed. The main objective is to evaluate the ability of popular turbulence models in capturing the characteristic features present during the quasi-laminarization phenomenon in highly accelerating turbulent boundary layers. Favorable pressure gradient is prescribed by a top converging surface (sink flow) with an approximately constant acceleration parameter of K = 4.0 x 10^(-6). Furthermore, the quasi-laminarization effect on the temperature field is also examined by solving the energy equation and assuming the temperature as a passive scalar. Validation of RANS results is carried out by means of a large DNS dataset.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4367-2017
