Checkpoint blockade immunotherapies harness the host's own immune system to fight cancer, but only work against tumors infiltrated by swarms of preexisting T cells. Unfortunately, most cancers to date are immune‐deserted. Here, a polymer‐assisted combination of immunogenic chemotherapy and PD‐L1 degradation is reported for efficacious treatment in originally nonimmunogenic cancer. “Priming” tumors with backbone‐degradable polymer‐epirubicin conjugates elicits immunogenic cell death and fosters tumor‐specific CD8+ T cell response. Sequential treatment with a multivalent polymer‐peptide antagonist to PD‐L1 overcomes adaptive PD‐L1 enrichment following chemotherapy, biases the recycling of PD‐L1 to lysosome degradation via surface receptor crosslinking, and produces prolonged elimination of PD‐L1 rather than the transient blocking afforded by standard anti‐PD‐L1 antibodies. Together, these findings establish the polymer‐facilitated tumor targeting of immunogenic drugs and surface crosslinking of PD‐L1 as a potential new therapeutic strategy to propagate long‐term antitumor immunity, which might broaden the application of immunotherapy to immunosuppressive cancers.
- Award ID(s):
- 1345646
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10083577
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Journal of biomedical nanotechnology
- Volume:
- 13
- Issue:
- 2
- ISSN:
- 1550-7033
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 232 - 242
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
Abstract -
Abstract In the field of optical imaging, the ability to image tumors at depth with high selectivity and specificity remains a challenge. Surface enhanced resonance Raman scattering (SERRS) nanoparticles (NPs) can be employed as image contrast agents to specifically target cells in vivo; however, this technique typically requires time-intensive point-by-point acquisition of Raman spectra. Here, we combine the use of “spatially offset Raman spectroscopy” (SORS) with that of SERRS in a technique known as “surface enhanced spatially offset resonance Raman spectroscopy” (SESORRS) to image deep-seated tumors in vivo. Additionally, by accounting for the laser spot size, we report an experimental approach for detecting both the bulk tumor, subsequent delineation of tumor margins at high speed, and the identification of a deeper secondary region of interest with fewer measurements than are typically applied. To enhance light collection efficiency, four modifications were made to a previously described custom-built SORS system. Specifically, the following parameters were increased: (i) the numerical aperture (NA) of the lens, from 0.2 to 0.34; (ii) the working distance of the probe, from 9 mm to 40 mm; (iii) the NA of the fiber, from 0.2 to 0.34; and (iv) the fiber diameter, from 100 µm to 400 µm. To calculate the sampling frequency, which refers to the number of data point spectra obtained for each image, we considered the laser spot size of the elliptical beam (6 × 4 mm). Using SERRS contrast agents, we performed in vivo SESORRS imaging on a GL261-Luc mouse model of glioblastoma at four distinct sampling frequencies: par-sampling frequency (12 data points collected), and over-frequency sampling by factors of 2 (35 data points collected), 5 (176 data points collected), and 10 (651 data points collected). In comparison to the previously reported SORS system, the modified SORS instrument showed a 300% improvement in signal-to-noise ratios (SNR). The results demonstrate the ability to acquire distinct Raman spectra from deep-seated glioblastomas in mice through the skull using a low power density (6.5 mW/mm2) and 30-times shorter integration times than a previous report (0.5 s versus 15 s). The ability to map the whole head of the mouse and determine a specific region of interest using as few as 12 spectra (6 s total acquisition time) is achieved. Subsequent use of a higher sampling frequency demonstrates it is possible to delineate the tumor margins in the region of interest with greater certainty. In addition, SESORRS images indicate the emergence of a secondary tumor region deeper within the brain in agreement with MRI and H&E staining. In comparison to traditional Raman imaging approaches, this approach enables improvements in the detection of deep-seated tumors in vivo through depths of several millimeters due to improvements in SNR, spectral resolution, and depth acquisition. This approach offers an opportunity to navigate larger areas of tissues in shorter time frames than previously reported, identify regions of interest, and then image the same area with greater resolution using a higher sampling frequency. Moreover, using a SESORRS approach, we demonstrate that it is possible to detect secondary, deeper-seated lesions through the intact skull.
-
Abstract Cancer immunotherapies have reshaped the paradigm for cancer treatment over the past decade. Among them, therapeutic cancer vaccines that aim to modulate antigen‐presenting cells and subsequent T cell priming processes are among the first FDA‐approved cancer immunotherapies. However, despite showing benign safety profiles and the capability to generate antigen‐specific humoral and cellular responses, cancer vaccines have been limited by the modest therapeutic efficacy, especially for immunologically cold solid tumors. One key challenge lies in the identification of tumor‐specific antigens, which involves a costly and lengthy process of tumor cell isolation, DNA/RNA extraction, sequencing, mutation analysis, epitope prediction, peptide synthesis, and antigen screening. To address these issues, in situ cancer vaccines have been actively pursued to generate endogenous antigens directly from tumors and utilize the generated tumor antigens to elicit potent cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) response. Biomaterials‐based in situ cancer vaccines, in particular, have achieved significant progress by taking advantage of biomaterials that can synergize antigens and adjuvants, troubleshoot delivery issues, home, and manipulate immune cells in situ. This review will provide an overview of biomaterials‐based in situ cancer vaccines, either living or artificial materials, under development or in the clinic, and discuss the design criteria for in situ cancer vaccines.
-
ABSTRACT Gene therapy platforms offer a variety of potentially effective solutions for development of targeted agents that can be exploited for cancer treatment. The physicochemical properties of nanocarriers can be tuned to enhance their localization in tumors, and cell specificity can also be increased by appropriate selection of gene targets. A relatively underexploited approach to enhance therapeutic selectivity in cancer tissues is the use of nanocarriers whose nuclear targeting and uptake are triggered by the altered expression of specific endomembrane trafficking proteins in cancer cells. Previously, we showed that histone 3 (H3) peptide‐targeted DNA polyplexes traffic to the nucleus efficiently through caveolar endocytosis followed by transfer through the Golgi and endoplasmic reticulum (ER). We hypothesized that these polyplexes would exhibit enhanced activity in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) cells, which overexpress caveolin‐1 as part of their invasive phenotype, and we also posited that this targeting effect could be exploited to facilitate IBC‐specific transfection and prodrug conversion in the presence of normal breast epithelial cells. Using cellular transfection experiments, function‐blocking assays, and confocal imaging in both IBC SUM149 cell monocultures and IBC SUM149 co‐cultures with MCF10A normal breast epithelial cells, we found that our H3‐targeted polyplexes selectively transfected IBC SUM149 cells at a 4‐fold higher level than normal breast epithelial cells. This selectivity and increased transfection were caused by a 2.2‐fold overexpression of caveolin‐1 in IBC SUM149 cells, which led to increased polyplex trafficking to the nucleus through the Golgi and ER. We also saw similar enhancements in cell selectivity and transfection when cells were transfected with a suicide gene/prodrug combination, as the increased expression of the suicide gene in IBC SUM149 cells led to a 55% decrease in viability in IBC SUM149 cells as compared to a 25% decrease in MCF10A cells. These findings demonstrate that differences in the expression of the endocytic membrane protein caveolin‐1 can be exploited for cell‐selective gene delivery, and ultimately, these gene‐based targeting approaches may be useful in potential treatments for aggressive cancer types. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2016;113: 2686–2697. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
-
null (Ed.)Background Despite approval of immunotherapy for a wide range of cancers, the majority of patients fail to respond to immunotherapy or relapse following initial response. These failures may be attributed to immunosuppressive mechanisms co-opted by tumor cells. However, it is challenging to use conventional methods to systematically evaluate the potential of tumor intrinsic factors to act as immune regulators in patients with cancer. Methods To identify immunosuppressive mechanisms in non-responders to cancer immunotherapy in an unbiased manner, we performed genome-wide CRISPR immune screens and integrated our results with multi-omics clinical data to evaluate the role of tumor intrinsic factors in regulating two rate-limiting steps of cancer immunotherapy, namely, T cell tumor infiltration and T cell-mediated tumor killing. Results Our studies revealed two distinct types of immune resistance regulators and demonstrated their potential as therapeutic targets to improve the efficacy of immunotherapy. Among them, PRMT1 and RIPK1 were identified as a dual immune resistance regulator and a cytotoxicity resistance regulator, respectively. Although the magnitude varied between different types of immunotherapy, genetically targeting PRMT1 and RIPK1 sensitized tumors to T-cell killing and anti-PD-1/OX40 treatment. Interestingly, a RIPK1-specific inhibitor enhanced the antitumor activity of T cell-based and anti-OX40 therapy, despite limited impact on T cell tumor infiltration. Conclusions Collectively, the data provide a rich resource of novel targets for rational immuno-oncology combinations.more » « less