More Like this

1. Effect of Field Drainage on Seismic Pore Pressure Buildup and Kσ under High Overburden Pressure

   https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002536  

   Ni, M. ; Abdoun, T. ; Dobry, R. ; El-Sekelly, W. ( September 2021 , Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering)
2. Contact Line Pinning and Depinning Prior to Rupture of an Evaporating Droplet in a Simulated Soil Pore

   https://doi.org/10.1115/ICNMM2020-1091  

   Chakraborty, Partha P. ; Derby, Melanie M. ( July 2020 , ASME 2020 18th International Conference on Nanochannels, Microchannels, and Minichannels collocated with the ASME 2020 Heat Transfer Summer Conference and the ASME 2020 Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting)

   Altering soil wettability by inclusion of hydrophobicity could be an effective way to restrict evaporation from soil, thereby conserving water resources. In this study, 4-μL sessile water droplets were evaporated from an artificial soil millipore comprised of three glass (i.e. hydrophilic) and Teflon (i.e. hydrophobic) 2.38-mm-diameter beads. The distance between the beads were kept constant (i.e. center-to-center spacing of 3.1 mm). Experiments were conducted in an environmental chamber at an air temperature of 20°C and 30% and 75% relative humidity (RH). Evaporation rates were faster (i.e. ∼19 minutes and ∼49 minutes at 30% and 75% RH) from hydrophilic pores than the Teflon one (i.e. ∼24 minutes and ∼52 minutes at 30% and 75% RH) due in part to greater air-water contact area. Rupture of liquid droplets during evaporation was analyzed and predictions were made on rupture based on contact line pinning and depinning, projected surface area just before rupture, and pressure difference across liquid-vapor interface. It was observed that, in hydrophilic pore, the liquid droplet was pinned on one bead and the contact line on the other beads continuously decreased by deforming the liquid-vapor interface, though all three gas-liquid-solid contact lines decreased at a marginal rate in hydrophobic pore. Formore »hydrophilic and hydrophobic pores, approximately 1.7 mm2 and 1.8–2 mm2 projected area of the droplet was predicted at 30% and 75% RH just before rupture occurs. Associated pressure difference responsible for rupture was estimated based on the deformation of curvature of liquid-vapor interface.« less
3. Observations of wave-induced pore pressure gradients and bed level response on a surf zone sandbar: WAVE-INDUCED PORE PRESSURE GRADIENTS

   https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012557  

   Anderson, Dylan ; Cox, Dan ; Mieras, Ryan ; Puleo, Jack A. ; Hsu, Tian-Jian ( June 2017 , Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans)
4. Effects of pore fluid pressure on slip behaviors: An experimental study: FLUID PRESSURE AND SLIP BEHAVIORS

   https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50543  

   Ougier-Simonin, A. ; Zhu, W. ( June 2013 , Geophysical Research Letters)
5. Experimental evidence for wall-rock pulverization during dynamic rupture at ultra-high pressure conditions

   https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2019.115832  

   Incel, S. ; Schubnel, A. ; Renner, J. ; John, T. ; Labrousse, L. ; Hilairet, N. ; Freeman, H. ; Wang, Y. ; Renard, F. ; Jamtveit, B. ( July 2019 , Earth and planetary science letters)