An official website of the United States government
Protein translation is globally downregulated under stress conditions. Many proteins that are synthesized under stress conditions use a cap-independent translation initiation pathway. A subset of cellular mRNAs that encode for these proteins contain stable secondary structures within their 5′UTR, and initiate cap-independent translation using elements called cap-independent translation enhancers or internal ribosome entry sites within their 5′UTRs. The interaction among initiation factors such as eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E), eIF4A, and eIF4GI, especially in regulating the eIF4F complex during noncanonical translation initiation of different 5′UTR mRNAs, is poorly understood. Here, equilibrium-binding assays, CD studies and in vitro translation assays were used to elucidate the recruitment of these initiation factors to the highly structured 5′UTRs of fibroblast-growth factor 9 (FGF-9) and hypoxia inducible factor 1 subunit alpha (HIF-1α) encoding mRNAs. We showed that eIF4A and eIF4E enhanced eIF4GI’s binding affinity to the uncapped 5′UTR of HIF-1α mRNA, inducing conformational changes in the protein/RNA complex. In contrast, these factors have no effect on the binding of eIF4GI to the 5′UTR of FGF-9 mRNA. Recently, Izidoro et al. reported that the interaction of 42nt unstructured RNA to human eIF4F complex is dominated by eIF4E and ATP-bound state of eIF4A. Here, we show that structured 5′UTR mRNA binding mitigates this requirement. Based on these observations, we describe two possible cap-independent translation mechanisms for FGF-9 and HIF-1α encoding mRNAs used by cells to mitigate cellular stress conditions.
more »
« less
Cap-Independent mRNA Translation in Germ Cells
Cellular mRNAs in plants and animals have a 5′-cap structure that is accepted as the recognition point to initiate translation by ribosomes. Consequently, it was long assumed that the translation initiation apparatus was built solely for a cap-dependent (CD) mechanism. Exceptions that emerged invoke structural damage (proteolytic cleavage) to eukaryotic initiation factor 4 (eIF4) factors that disable cap recognition. The residual eIF4 complex is thought to be crippled, but capable of cap-independent (CI) translation to recruit viral or death-associated mRNAs begrudgingly when cells are in great distress. However, situations where CI translation coexists with CD translation are now known. In such cases, CI translation is still a minor mechanism in the major background of CD synthesis. In this review, I propose that germ cells do not fit this mold. Using observations from various animal models of oogenesis and spermatogenesis, I suggest that CI translation is a robust partner to CD translation to carry out the translational control that is so prevalent in germ cell development. Evidence suggests that CI translation provides surveillance of germ cell homeostasis, while CD translation governs the regulated protein synthesis that ushers these meiotic cells through the remarkable steps in sperm/oocyte differentiation.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1714264
- PAR ID:
- 10093388
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- International Journal of Molecular Sciences
- Volume:
- 20
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 1422-0067
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 173
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Initiation of translation for the majority of eukaryotic mRNAs is mediated by a 50 cap structure to which the eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) binds. Inhibition of the activity of eIF4E by 4EBP-1 does not prevent the translation of a number of cellular capped mRNAs, indicative of the existence of previously unexplored mechanisms for the translation of these capped mRNAs without the requirement of eIF4E. eIF4G2, also known as death-associated protein 5 (DAP5), a homolog of eIFGI that lacks the eIF4E binding domain, utilizes eIF3d (a subunit of eIF3) to promote the translation of a subset of these mRNAs. Using fluorescence anisotropy-based equilibrium binding studies, we provide the first quantitative evidence of the recruitment of eIF3d as well as eIF3d and eIFG2 complexes to a subset of human mRNAs. Our quantitative studies demonstrate the critical role a fully methylated 50 mRNA cap structure plays in the recognition and recruitment of eIF3d, as well as the eIF3d and eIFG2 complex. By using luciferase reporter-based in vitro translation assays, we further show that cap-recognition ability correlates with the efficiency of translation of these mRNAs. Essentially, by preferably utilizing eIF3d and eIFG2, specific mRNA subsets are still able to translate in a cap-dependent manner even when eIF4E is sequestered. Our findings offer new insight into the use of eIF3d and eIF4G2 as an alternative for growth and survival under conditions of cellular stress. This novel mechanism of translation may offer new targets for therapeutic regulation of mRNA translation.more » « less
-
Kennedy, S (Ed.)Abstract We studied translation factor eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) paralogs that regulate germline mRNAs. Translational control of mRNAs is essential for germ cell differentiation and embryogenesis. Messenger ribonucleoprotein complexes assemble on mRNAs in the nucleus, as they exit via perinuclear germ granules, and in the cytoplasm. Bound messenger ribonucleoproteins including eIF4E exert both positive and negative posttranscriptional regulation. In Caenorhabditiselegans, germ granules are surprisingly dynamic messenger ribonucleoprotein condensates that remodel during development. Two eIF4E paralogs (IFE-1 and IFE-3), their cognate eIF4E–interacting proteins, and polyadenylated mRNAs are present in germ granules. Affinity purification of IFE-1 and IFE-3 messenger ribonucleoproteins allowed mass spectrometry and mRNA-Seq to identify other proteins and the mRNAs that populate stable eukaryotic initiation factor 4E complexes. We find translationally repressed mRNAs (e.g. pos-1, mex-3, spn-4, etc.) enriched with IFE-3, but excluded from IFE-1. Identified mRNAs overlap substantially with mRNAs previously described to be IFE-1 dependent for translation. The findings suggest that oocytes and embryos utilize the 2 eukaryotic initiation factor 4E paralogs for opposite purposes on critically regulated germline mRNAs. Sublocalization within adult perinuclear germ granules suggests an architecture in which Vasa/GLH-1, PGL-1, and the IFEs are stratified, which may facilitate sequential remodeling of messenger ribonucleoproteins leaving the nucleus. Biochemical composition of isolated messenger ribonucleoproteins indicates opposing yet cooperative roles for the 2 eukaryotic initiation factor 4E paralogs. We propose that the IFEs accompany controlled mRNAs in the repressed or activated state during transit to the cytoplasm. Copurification of IFE-1 with IFE-3 suggests they may interact to move repressed mRNAs to ribosomes.more » « less
-
Abstract Viral mRNAs that lack a 5′ m7GTP cap and a 3′ poly-A tail rely on structural elements in their untranslated regions (UTRs) to form unique RNA-protein complexes that regulate viral translation. Recent studies of the barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV) have revealed eukaryotic initiation factor 3 (eIF3) plays a significant role in facilitating communication between its 5′ and 3′ UTRs by binding both UTRs simultaneously. This report uses in vitro translation assays, fluorescence anisotropy binding assays, and selective 2′-hydroxyl acylation analyzed by primer extension (SHAPE) footprinting to identify secondary structures that are selectively interacting with eIF3. SHAPE data also show that eIF3 alters its interaction with BYDV structures when another factor crucial for BYDV translation, eIF4F, is introduced by the 3′ BYDV translational enhancer (BTE). The observed BTE and eIF4F-induced shift of eIF3 position on the 5’ UTR and the translational effects of altering eIF3-binding structures (SLC and SLII) support a new model for BYDV translation initiation that requires the reorientation of eIF3 on BYDV UTRs. This eIF3 function in BYDV translation initiation is both reminiscent of and distinct from eIF3–RNA interactions found in other non-canonically translating mRNAs (e.g. HCV). This characterization of a new role in translation initiation expands the known functionality of eIF3 and may be broadly applicable to other non-canonically translating mRNAs.more » « less
-
True, John (Ed.)Abstract The copackaging of mRNAs into biomolecular condensates called germ granules is a conserved strategy to posttranscriptionally regulate germline mRNAs. In Drosophila melanogaster, mRNAs accumulate in germ granules by forming homotypic clusters, aggregates containing multiple transcripts from the same gene. Nucleated by Oskar (Osk), homotypic clusters are generated through a stochastic seeding and self-recruitment process that requires the 3′ untranslated region (UTR) of germ granule mRNAs. Interestingly, the 3′ UTR belonging to germ granule mRNAs, such as nanos (nos), have considerable sequence variations among Drosophila species and we hypothesized that this diversity influences homotypic clustering. To test our hypothesis, we investigated the homotypic clustering of nos and polar granule component (pgc) in four Drosophila species and concluded that clustering is a conserved process used to enrich germ granule mRNAs. However, we discovered germ granule phenotypes that included significant changes in the abundance of transcripts present in species’ homotypic clusters, which also reflected diversity in the number of coalesced primordial germ cells within their embryonic gonads. By integrating biological data with computational modeling, we found that multiple mechanisms underlie naturally occurring germ granule diversity, including changes in nos, pgc, osk levels and/or homotypic clustering efficacy. Furthermore, we demonstrated how the nos 3′ UTR from different species influences nos clustering, causing granules to have ∼70% less nos and increasing the presence of defective primordial germ cells. Our results highlight the impact that evolution has on germ granules, which should provide broader insight into processes that modify compositions and activities of other classes of biomolecular condensate.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20010173
