skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Block Oriented Programming: Automating Data-Only Attacks
With the widespread deployment of Control-Flow Integrity (CFI), control-flow hijacking attacks, and consequently code reuse attacks, are significantly more difficult. CFI limits control flow to well-known locations, severely restricting arbitrary code execution. Assessing the remaining attack surface of an application under advanced control-flow hijack defenses such as CFI and shadow stacks remains an open problem. We introduce BOPC, a mechanism to automatically assess whether an attacker can execute arbitrary code on a binary hardened with CFI/shadow stack defenses. BOPC computes exploits for a target program from payload specifications written in a Turing-complete, high-level language called SPL that abstracts away architecture and program-specific details. SPL payloads are compiled into a program trace that executes the desired behavior on top of the target binary. The input for BOPC is an SPL payload, a starting point (e.g., from a fuzzer crash) and an arbitrary memory write primitive that allows application state corruption. To map SPL payloads to a program trace, BOPC introduces Block Oriented Programming (BOP), a new code reuse technique that utilizes entire basic blocks as gadgets along valid execution paths in the program, i.e., without violating CFI or shadow stack policies. We find that the problem of mapping payloads to program traces is NP-hard, so BOPC first reduces the search space by pruning infeasible paths and then uses heuristics to guide the search to probable paths. BOPC encodes the BOP payload as a set of memory writes. We execute 13 SPL payloads applied to 10 popular applications. BOPC successfully finds payloads and complex execution traces ś which would likely not have been found through manual analysis ś while following the target’s Control-Flow Graph under an ideal CFI policy in 81% of the cases.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1801534
PAR ID:
10095765
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
25th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (ACM CCS)
Page Range / eLocation ID:
1868 to 1882
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; (, 2021 The ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE))
    null (Ed.)
    This paper proposes a new approach for debugging errors in floating point computation by performing shadow execution with higher precision in parallel. The programmer specifies parts of the program that need to be debugged for errors. Our compiler creates shadow execution tasks, which execute on different cores and perform the computation with higher precision. We propose a novel method to execute a shadow execution task from an arbitrary memory state, which is necessary because we are creating a parallel shadow execution from a sequential program. Our approach also ensures that the shadow execution follows the same control flow path as the original program. Our runtime automatically distributes the shadow execution tasks to balance the load on the cores. Our prototype for parallel shadow execution, PFPSanitizer, provides comprehensive detection of errors while having lower performance overheads than prior approaches. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; (, Proceedings of the USENIX Annual Technical Conference)
    The OS kernel is at the forefront of a system's security. Therefore, its own security is crucial for the correctness and integrity of user applications. With a plethora of bugs continuously discovered in OS kernel code, defenses and mitigations are essential for practical kernel security. One important defense strategy is to isolate user-controlled memory from kernel-accessible memory, in order to mitigate attacks like ret2usr and ret2dir. We present EPF (Evil Packet Filter): a new method for bypassing various (both deployed and proposed) kernel isolation techniques by abusing the BPF infrastructure of the Linux kernel: i.e., by leveraging BPF code, provided by unprivileged users/programs, as attack payloads. We demonstrate two different EPF instances, namely BPF-Reuse and BPF-ROP, which utilize malicious BPF payloads to mount privilege escalation attacks in both 32- and 64-bit x86 platforms. We also present the design, implementation, and evaluation of a set of defenses to enforce the isolation between BPF instructions and benign kernel data, and the integrity of BPF program execution, effectively providing protection against EPF-based attacks. Our implemented defenses show minimal overhead (<3%) in BPF-heavy tasks. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; (, Annual Computer Security Applications Conference)
    Internet-of-Things devices such as autonomous vehicular sensors, medical devices, and industrial cyber-physical systems commonly rely on small, resource-constrained microcontrollers (MCUs). MCU software is typically written in C and is prone to memory safety vulnerabilities that are exploitable by remote attackers to launch code reuse attacks and code/control data leakage attacks. We present Randezvous, a highly performant diversification-based mitigation to such attacks and their brute force variants on ARM MCUs. Atop code/data layout randomization and an efficient execute-only code approach, Randezvous creates decoy pointers to camouflage control data in memory; code pointers in the stack are then protected by a diversified shadow stack, local-to-global variable promotion, and return address nullification. Moreover, Randezvous adds a novel delayed reboot mechanism to slow down persistent attacks and mitigates control data spraying attacks via global guards. We demonstrate Randezvous’s security by statistically modeling leakage-equipped brute force attacks under Randezvous, crafting a proof-of-concept exploit that shows Randezvous’s efficacy, and studying a real-world CVE. Our evaluation of Randezvous shows low overhead on three benchmark suites and two applications. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; (, IEEE)
    The increased parallelism in modern processors has sparked interest in offloading security policy enforcement to processes or hardware operating in parallel with the main application. This approach can reduce application latency, enhance security, and improve compatibility. However, existing software solutions often incur high overheads and are susceptible to memory corruption attacks, while hardware solutions tend to be inflexible and require substantial modifications to the processor. In this paper, we present SIDECAR, a novel approach that offloads security checks to run concurrently with applications by leveraging the debugging infrastructure available in commodity processors. Specifically, we utilize softwaredriven logging (SDL) extensions in Intel and Arm processors to create secure, append-only channels between applications and security monitors. We build and evaluate a prototype of SIDECAR for the x86-64 and Aarch64 architectures. To demonstrate its utility, we adapt well-known security defenses within SIDECAR, providing control-flow integrity (CFI), shadow call stacks (SCS), and memory error checking (ASAN). Our evaluation shows that these extensions perform better on the Intel architecture. In terms of defenses, SIDECAR reduces the latency of CFI in the tested real-world applications by an average of 30%, offers enhanced security with similar overhead for SCS, and is versatile enough to support complex defenses like ASAN. Furthermore, our security monitor for CFI+SCS is 30 times more efficient compared to previous work. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; ; (, 2021 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security)
    Provenance-based causal analysis of audit logs has proven to be an invaluable method of investigating system intrusions. However, it also suffers from dependency explosion, whereby long-running processes accumulate many dependencies that are hard to unravel. Execution unit partitioning addresses this by segmenting dependencies into units of work, such as isolating the events that processed a single HTTP request. Unfortunately, we discover that current designs have a semantic gap problem due to how system calls and application log messages are used to infer complex internal program states. We demonstrate how attackers can modify existing code exploits to control event partitioning, breaking links in the attack and framing innocent users. We also show how our techniques circumvent existing program and log integrity defenses. We then propose a new design for execution unit partitioning that leverages additional runtime data to yield verified partitions that resist manipulation. Our design overcomes the technical challenges of minimizing additional overhead while accurately connecting low level code instructions to high level audit events, in part with the use of commodity hardware processor tracing. We implement a prototype of our design for Linux, MARSARA, and extensively evaluate it on 14 real-world programs, targeted with expertly crafted exploits. MARSARA's verified partitions successfully capture all the attack provenances while only reintroducing 2.82% of false dependencies, in the worst case, with an average overhead of 8.7%. Using a new metric called Partitioning Attack Surface, we show that MARSARA eliminates 47,642 more repartitioning gadgets per program than integrity defenses like CFI, demonstrating our prototype's effectiveness and the novelty of the attacks it prevents. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email