Teams of robots tasked with making critical decisions in competitive environments are at risk for being shepherded or misdirected to a location that is advantageous for a competing team. Our lab is working to understand how adversarial teams of robots can successfully move their competition to desired locations in part so that we can then devise practices to counter these strategies and help make team functioning more successful and secure. In this paper, preliminary research is presented that studies how a team of robots can be shepherded or misdirected to a disadvantageous location. We draw inspiration from herding practices as well as deceptive practices seen in higher-order primates and humans. We define behaviors for the target (mark) agents to be moved as well as members of the shepherding team (a pushing agent and pulling shills) and present simulation results showing how these behaviors move robots to a desired location. These behaviors were implemented and trialed on hardware platform. A discussion of ongoing research into understanding misdirection in multi-robot teams concludes this paper.
more »
« less
Misdirection in Robot Teams: Methods and Ethical Considerations
Trust, dependability, cohesion, and capability are integral to an effective team. These attributes are the same for teams of robots. When multiple teams with competing incentives are tasked, a strategy, if available, may be to weaken, influence or sway the attributes of other teams and limit their understanding of their full range of options. Such strategies are widely found in nature and in sporting contests such as feints, misdirection, etc. This talk focuses on one class of higher-level strategies for multi-robots, i.e., to intentionally misdirect using shills or confederates where needed, and the ethical considerations associated with deploying such teams. As multi-robot
systems become more autonomous, distributed, networked, numerous, and with more capability to make critical decisions, the prospect for intentional and unintentional misdirection must be anticipated. While benefits are clearly apparent to the team performing the deception, ethical questions surrounding the use of misdirection or other forms of deception are quite real.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1848653
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10098534
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- 2019 International Association for Computing and Philosophy annual conference
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
This NSF funded project currently underway studies strategies to enable robots, multi-robots and teams of multi-robots to model, generate, and cope with misdirection in various situations. This research direction in robotic control offers a novel approach to resilience in and among these teams to these forms of possible disruption. Computational models, drawn particularly from studies of human endeavors and group behaviors, provide a general framework for understanding, producing, and countering misdirection in robotic systems. A framework of computational models will be designed using recursive schema-theoretic models of behaviors at the individual and team levels, building on decentralized methods of control and communication.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)When teams of mobile robots are tasked with different goals in a competitive environment, misdirection and counter-misdirection can provide significant advantages. Researchers have studied different misdirection methods but the number of approaches on counter-misdirection for multi-robot systems is still limited. In this work, a novel counter-misdirection approach for behavior-based multi-robot teams is developed by deploying a new type of agent: counter misdirection agents (CMAs). These agents can detect the misdirection process and “push back” the misdirected agents collaboratively to stop the misdirection process. This approach has been implemented not only in simulation for various conditions, but also on a physical robotic testbed to study its effectiveness. It shows that this approach can stop the misdirection process effectively with a sufficient number of CMAs. This novel counter-misdirection approach can potentially be applied to different competitive scenarios such as military and sports applications.more » « less
-
We consider the problem of multi-robot sensor coverage, which deals with deploying a multi-robot team in an environment and optimizing the sensing quality of the overall environment. As real-world environments involve a variety of sensory information, and individual robots are limited in their available number of sensors, successful multi-robot sensor coverage requires the deployment of robots in such a way that each individual team member’s sensing quality is maximized. Additionally, because individual robots have varying complements of sensors and both robots and sensors can fail, robots must be able to adapt and adjust how they value each sensing capability in order to obtain the most complete view of the environment, even through changes in team composition. We introduce a novel formulation for sensor coverage by multi-robot teams with heterogeneous sensing capabilities that maximizes each robot's sensing quality, balancing the varying sensing capabilities of individual robots based on the overall team composition. We propose a solution based on regularized optimization that uses sparsity-inducing terms to ensure a robot team focuses on all possible event types, and which we show is proven to converge to the optimal solution. Through extensive simulation, we show that our approach is able to effectively deploy a multi-robot team to maximize the sensing quality of an environment, responding to failures in the multi-robot team more robustly than non-adaptive approaches.more » « less
-
The configuration that an instructor enters into an algorithmic team formation tool determines how students are grouped into teams, impacting their learning experiences. One way to decide the configuration is to solicit input from the students. Prior work has investigated the criteria students prefer for team formation, but has not studied how students prioritize the criteria or to what degree students agree with each other. This paper describes a workflow for gathering student preferences for how to weight the criteria entered into a team formation tool, and presents the results of a study in which the workflow was implemented in four semesters of the same project-based design course. In the most recent semester, the workflow was supplemented with an online peer discussion to learn about students' rationale for their selections. Our results show that students want to be grouped with other students who share the same course commitment and compatible schedules the most. Students prioritize demographic attributes next, and then task skills such as programming needed for the project work. We found these outcomes to be consistent in each instance of the course. Instructors can use our results to guide team formation in their own project-based design courses and replicate our workflow to gather student preferences for team formation in any course.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- The DOI is not currently available.
