An official website of the United States government
In the Boynton Illusion, the perceived location of a low-contrast chromatic edge is altered by a nearby high-contrast luminance contour. Our study explores this color spreading effect across different chromatic directions using a position judgment task. We used the gap effect stimulus, which consists of a box evenly divided by a central contour, in half of the conditions. The suprathreshold chromatic test area embedded in the box provided a horizontal chromatic edge parallel to the central, high-contrast luminance contour that varied in its distance from the contour. An attraction effect of the nearest high-contrast contour on low-contrast chromatic and achromatic edges was observed. Specifically, when the test area is smaller than the region defined by the outer and middle contours, the edge is perceived to be closer to the middle contour (the colored area is perceived to be larger), a filling-in effect; conversely, when the test area extends beyond the middle contour, the edge is perceived to be closer to the middle contour (the colored area is perceived to be smaller), indicating a filling-out of color. Achromatic directions exhibit a relatively smaller effect than chromatic directions, whereas S-cone and equiluminant red and green edges show the same magnitude of positional displacement. The results can be interpreted as the visual system attempting to assign a single hue or brightness to a demarcated region.
more »
« less
The Effect of Color Scales on Climate Scientists' Objective and Subjective Performance in Spatial Data Analysis Tasks
Geographical maps encoded with rainbow color scales are widely used for spatial data analysis in climate science, despite evidence from the visualization literature that they are not perceptually optimal. We present a controlled user study that compares the effect of color scales on performance accuracy for climate-modeling tasks using pairs of continuous geographical maps generated using climatological metrics. For each pair of maps, 39 scientist-observers judged: i) the magnitude of their difference, ii) their degree of spatial similarity, and iii) the region of greatest dissimilarity between them. Besides the rainbow color scale, two other continuous color scales were chosen such that all three of them covaried two dimensions (luminance monotonicity and hue banding), hypothesized to have an impact on visual performance. We also analyzed subjective performance measures, such as user confidence, perceived accuracy, preference, and familiarity in using the different color scales. We found that monotonic luminance scales produced significantly more accurate judgments of magnitude difference but were not superior in spatial comparison tasks, and that hue banding had differential effects based on the task and conditions. Scientists expressed the highest preference and perceived confidence and accuracy with the rainbow, despite its poor performance on the magnitude comparison tasks.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1730396
- PAR ID:
- 10101276
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics
- ISSN:
- 1077-2626
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Color composition (or color theme) is a key factor to determine how well a piece of art work or graphical design is perceived by humans. Despite a few color harmony models have been proposed, their results are often less satisfactory since they mostly neglect the variations of aesthetic cognition among individuals and treat the influence of all ratings equally as if they were all rated by the same anonymous user. To overcome this issue, in this article we propose a new color theme evaluation model by combining a back propagation neural network and a kernel probabilistic model to infer both the color theme rating and the user aesthetic preference. Our experiment results show that our model can predict more accurate and personalized color theme ratings than state of the art methods. Our work is also the first-of-its-kind effort to quantitatively evaluate the correlation between user aesthetic preferences and color harmonies of five-color themes, and study such a relation for users with different aesthetic cognition.more » « less
-
Abstract Color encoding is foundational to visualizing quantitative data. Guidelines for colormap design have traditionally emphasized perceptual principles, such as order and uniformity. However, colors also evoke cognitive and linguistic associations whose role in data interpretation remains underexplored. We study how two linguistic factors, name salience and name variation, affect people's ability to draw inferences from spatial visualizations. In two experiments, we found that participants are better at interpreting visualizations when viewing colors with more salient names (e.g., prototypical ‘blue’, ‘yellow’, and ‘red’ over ‘teal’, ‘beige’, and ‘maroon’). The effect was robust across four visualization types, but was more pronounced in continuous (e.g., smooth geographical maps) than in similar discrete representations (e.g., choropleths). Participants' accuracy also improved as the number of nameable colors increased, although the latter had a less robust effect. Our findings suggest that color nameability is an important design consideration for quantitative colormaps, and may even outweigh traditional perceptual metrics. In particular, we found that the linguistic associations of color are a better predictor of performance than the perceptual properties of those colors. We discuss the implications and outline research opportunities. The data and materials for this study are available athttps://osf.io/asb7nmore » « less
-
Due to the additive light model employed by current optical see-through head-mounted displays (OST-HMDs), the perceived contrast of displayed imagery is reduced with increased environment luminance, often to the point where it becomes difficult for the user to accurately distinguish the presence of visual imagery. While existing contrast models, such as Weber contrast and Michelson contrast, can be used to predict when the observer will experience difficulty distinguishing and interpreting stimuli on traditional dis-plays, these models must be adapted for use with additive displays. In this paper, we present a simplified model of luminance contrast for optical see-through displays derived from Michelson's contrast equation and demonstrate two applications of the model: informing design decisions involving the color of virtual imagery and optimizing environment light attenuation through the use of neutral density filters.more » « less
-
In affective computing, classification algorithms are used to recognize users’ psychological states and adapt tasks to optimize user experience. However, classification is never perfect, and the relationship between adaptation accuracy and user experience remains understudied. It is also unclear whether the adaptation magnitude (‘size’ of action taken to influence user states) influences effects of adaptation accuracy. To evaluate impacts of adaptation accuracy (appropriate vs. inappropriate actions) and magnitude on user experience, we conducted a ‘Wizard of Oz’ study where 112 participants interacted with the Multi-Attribute Task Battery over three 11-minute intervals. An adaptation accuracy (50 % to 80 %) was preassigned for the first 11-minute interval, and accuracy increased by 10 % in each subsequent interval. Task difficulty changed every minute, and participant preferences for difficulty changes were assessed at the same time. Adaptation accuracy was artificially induced by fixing the percentage of times the difficulty changes matched participant preferences. Participants were also randomized to two magnitude conditions, with difficulty modified by 1 (low) or 3 (high) levels each minute. User experience metrics were assessed after each interval. Analysis with latent growth models offered support for linear increases in user experience across increasing levels of adaptation accuracy. For each 10 % gain in accuracy, results indicate a 1.3 (95 % CI [.35, 2.20]) point increase in NASA Task Load Index scores (range 6–60), a 0.40 (95 % CI [.18, 0.57]) increase in effort/importance (range 2–14), and 0.48 (95 % CI [.24, 0.72]) increase in perceived competence (range 2–14). Furthermore, the effect of accuracy on Task Load Index scores was modulated by adaptation magnitude. No effects were observed for interest/enjoyment or pressure/tension. By providing quantitative estimates of effects of adaptation accuracy on user experience, the study provides guidelines for researchers and developers of affect-aware technologies. Furthermore, our methods could be adapted for use in other affective computing scenarios.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2876539
