More Like this

1. Structural cavities are critical to balancing stability and activity of a membrane-integral enzyme

   https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1917770117  

   Guo, Ruiqiong ; Cang, Zixuan ; Yao, Jiaqi ; Kim, Miyeon ; Deans, Erin ; Wei, Guowei ; Kang, Seung-gu ; Hong, Heedeok ( September 2020 , Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)

   null (Ed.)

   Packing interaction is a critical driving force in the folding of helical membrane proteins. Despite the importance, packing defects (i.e., cavities including voids, pockets, and pores) are prevalent in membrane-integral enzymes, channels, transporters, and receptors, playing essential roles in function. Then, a question arises regarding how the two competing requirements, packing for stability vs. cavities for function, are reconciled in membrane protein structures. Here, using the intramembrane protease GlpG of Escherichia coli as a model and cavity-filling mutation as a probe, we tested the impacts of native cavities on the thermodynamic stability and function of a membrane protein. We find several stabilizing mutations which induce substantial activity reduction without distorting the active site. Notably, these mutations are all mapped onto the regions of conformational flexibility and functional importance, indicating that the cavities facilitate functional movement of GlpG while compromising the stability. Experiment and molecular dynamics simulation suggest that the stabilization is induced by the coupling between enhanced protein packing and weakly unfavorable lipid desolvation, or solely by favorable lipid solvation on the cavities. Our result suggests that, stabilized by the relatively weak interactions with lipids, cavities are accommodated in membrane proteins without severe energetic cost, which, in turn, serve as a platform to fine-tune the balance between stability and flexibility for optimal activity. 

   more » « less
2. Lipid bilayer induces contraction of the denatured state ensemble of a helical-bundle membrane protein

   https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2109169119  

   Gaffney, Kristen A. ; Guo, Ruiqiong ; Bridges, Michael D. ; Muhammednazaar, Shaima ; Chen, Daoyang ; Kim, Miyeon ; Yang, Zhongyu ; Schilmiller, Anthony L. ; Faruk, Nabil F. ; Peng, Xiangda ; et al ( January 2022 , Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)

   Defining the denatured state ensemble (DSE) and disordered proteins is essential to understanding folding, chaperone action, degradation, and translocation. As compared with water-soluble proteins, the DSE of membrane proteins is much less characterized. Here, we measure the DSE of the helical membrane protein GlpG of Escherichia coli ( E. coli ) in native-like lipid bilayers. The DSE was obtained using our steric trapping method, which couples denaturation of doubly biotinylated GlpG to binding of two streptavidin molecules. The helices and loops are probed using limited proteolysis and mass spectrometry, while the dimensions are determined using our paramagnetic biotin derivative and double electron–electron resonance spectroscopy. These data, along with our Upside simulations, identify the DSE as being highly dynamic, involving the topology changes and unfolding of some of the transmembrane (TM) helices. The DSE is expanded relative to the native state but only to 15 to 75% of the fully expanded condition. The degree of expansion depends on the local protein packing and the lipid composition. E. coli ’s lipid bilayer promotes the association of TM helices in the DSE and, probably in general, facilitates interhelical interactions. This tendency may be the outcome of a general lipophobic effect of proteins within the cell membranes. 

   more » « less
3. A threonine zipper that mediates protein–protein interactions: Structure and prediction

   https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.3505  

   Oi, Curran ; Treado, John D. ; Levine, Zachary A. ; Lim, Christopher S. ; Knecht, Kirsten M. ; Xiong, Yong ; O'Hern, Corey S. ; Regan, Lynne ( October 2018 , Protein Science)

   We present the structure of an engineered protein–protein interface between two beta barrel proteins, which is mediated by interactions between threonine (Thr) residues. This Thr zipper structure suggests that the protein interface is stabilized by close‐packing of the Thr residues, with only one intermonomer hydrogen bond (H‐bond) between two of the Thr residues. This Thr‐rich interface provides a unique opportunity to study the behavior of Thr in the context of many other Thr residues. In previous work, we have shown that the side chain (χ₁) dihedral angles of interface and core Thr residues can be predicted with high accuracy using a hard sphere plus stereochemical constraint (HS) model. Here, we demonstrate that in the Thr‐rich local environment of the Thr zipper structure, we are able to predict theχ₁dihedral angles of most of the Thr residues. Some, however, are not well predicted by the HS model. We therefore employed explicitly solvated molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to further investigate the side chain conformations of these residues. The MD simulations illustrate the role that transient H‐bonding to water, in combination with steric constraints, plays in determining the behavior of these Thr side chains.

   Broader Audience Statement: Protein–protein interactions are critical to life and the search for ways to disrupt adverse protein–protein interactions involved in disease is an ongoing area of drug discovery. We must better understand protein–protein interfaces, both to be able to disrupt existing ones and to engineer new ones for a variety of biotechnological applications. We have discovered and characterized an artificial Thr‐rich protein–protein interface. This novel interface demonstrates a heretofore unknown property of Thr‐rich surfaces: mediating protein–protein interactions.

    

   more » « less
4. An in vitro mimic of in‐cell solvation for protein folding studies

   https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.3833  

   Davis, Caitlin M. ; Deutsch, Jonathan ; Gruebele, Martin ( February 2020 , Protein Science)

   Ficoll, an inert macromolecule, is a common in vitro crowder, but by itself it does not reproduce in‐cell stability or kinetic trends for protein folding. Lysis buffer, which contains ions, glycerol as a simple kosmotrope, and mimics small crowders with hydrophilic/hydrophobic patches, can reproduce sticking trends observed in cells but not the crowding. We previously suggested that the proper combination of Ficoll and lysis buffer could reproduce the opposite in‐cell folding stability trend of two proteins: variable major protein‐like sequence expressed (VlsE) is destabilized in eukaryotic cells and phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK) is stabilized. Here, to discover a well‐characterized solvation environment that mimics in‐cell stabilities for these two very differently behaved proteins, we conduct a two‐dimensional scan of Ficoll (0–250 mg/ml) and lysis buffer (0–75%) mixtures. Contrary to our previous expectation, we show that mixtures of Ficoll and lysis buffer have a significant nonadditive effect on the folding stability. Lysis buffer enhances the stabilizing effect of Ficoll on PGK and inhibits the stabilizing effect of Ficoll on VlsE. We demonstrate that a combination of 150 mg/ml Ficoll and 60% lysis buffer can be used as an in vitro mimic to account for both crowding and non‐steric effects on PGK and VlsE stability and folding kinetics in the cell. Our results also suggest that this mixture is close to the point where phase separation will occur. The simple mixture proposed here, based on commercially available reagents, could be a useful tool to study a variety of cytoplasmic protein interactions, such as folding, binding and assembly, and enzymatic reactions.

   The complexity of the in‐cell environment is difficult to reproduce in the test tube. Here we validate a mimic of cellular crowding and sticking interactions in a test tube using two proteins that are differently impacted by the cell: one is stabilized and the other is destabilized. This mimic is a starting point to reproduce cellular effects on a variety of protein and biomolecular interactions, such as folding and binding.

    

   more » « less
5. Protein folding ‐ seeing is deceiving

   https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.4096  

   Rose, George D. ( May 2021 , Protein Science)

   This Perspective is intended to raise questions about the conventional interpretation of protein folding. According to the conventional interpretation, developed over many decades, a protein population can visit a vast number of conformations under unfolding conditions, but a single dominant native population emerges under folding conditions. Accordingly, folding comes with a substantial loss of conformational entropy. How is this price paid? The conventional answer is that favorable interactions between and among the side chains can compensate for entropy loss, and moreover, these interactions are responsible for the structural particulars of the native conformation. Challenging this interpretation, the Perspective introduces a proposal that high energy (i.e., unfavorable) excluding interactions winnow the accessible population substantially under physical–chemical conditions that favor folding. Both steric clash and unsatisfied hydrogen bond donors and acceptors are classified asexcluding interactions, so called because conformers with such disfavored interactions will be largely excluded from the thermodynamic population. Both excluding interactions and solvent factors that induce compactness are somewhat nonspecific, yet together they promote substantial chain organization. Moreover, proteins are built on a backbone scaffold consisting of α‐helices and strands of β‐sheet, where the number of hydrogen bond donors and acceptors is exactly balanced. These repetitive secondary structural elements are the only two conformers that can be both completely hydrogen‐bond satisfied and extended indefinitely without encountering a steric clash. Consequently, the number of fundamental folds is limited to no more than ~10,000 for a protein domain. Once excluding interactions are taken into account, the issue of “frustration” is largely eliminated and the Levinthal paradox is resolved.Putting the “bottom line” at the top: it is likely that hydrogen‐bond satisfaction represents a largely under‐appreciated parameter in protein folding models.

    

   more » « less