skip to main content


Title: Developing a problem-solving measure for grade 4.
Problem solving is central to mathematics learning (NCTM, 2014). Assessments are needed that appropriately measure students’ problem-solving performance. More importantly, assessments must be grounded in robust validity evidence that justifies their interpretations and outcomes (AERA et al., 2014). Thus, measures that are grounded in validity evidence are warranted for use by practitioners and scholars. The purpose of this presentation is to convey validity evidence for a new measure titled Problem-Solving Measure for grade four (PSM4). The research question is: What validity evidence supports PSM4 administration? The PSM4 is one assessment within the previously published PSM series designed for elementary and middle grades students. Problems are grounded in Schoenfeld’s (2011) framework and rely upon Verschaffel et al. (1999) perspective that word problems be open, complex, and realistic. The mathematics in the problems is tied to USA grade-level content and practice standards (CCSSI, 2010).  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1720646
NSF-PAR ID:
10106802
Author(s) / Creator(s):
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Proceedings of the 43rd Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education
Volume:
4
Page Range / eLocation ID:
4-16
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Lischka, A. ; Dyer, E. ; Jones, R. ; Lovett, J. ; Strayer, J. ; Drown, S. (Ed.)
    Using a test for a purpose it was not intended for can promote misleading results and interpretations, potentially leading to negative consequences from testing (AERA et al., 2014). For example, a mathematics test designed for use with grade 7 students is likely inappropriate for use with grade 3 students. There may be cases when a test can be used with a population related to the intended one; however, validity evidence and claims must be examined. We explored the use of student measures with preservice teachers (PSTs) in a teacher-education context. The present study intends to spark a discussion about using some student measures with teachers. The Problem-solving Measures (PSMs) were developed for use with grades 3-8 students. They measure students’ problem-solving performance within the context of the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (CCSSI, 2010; see Bostic & Sondergeld, 2015; Bostic et al., 2017; Bostic et al., 2021). After their construction, the developers wondered: If students were expected to engage successfully on the PSMs, then might future grades 3-8 teachers also demonstrate proficiency? 
    more » « less
  2. Lischka, A ; Dyer, E. ; Lovett, J. Strayer ; Drown, S. (Ed.)
    Using a test for a purpose it was not intended for can promote misleading results and interpretations, potentially leading to negative consequences from testing (AERA et al., 2014). For example, a mathematics test designed for use with grade 7 students is likely inappropriate for use with grade 3 students. There may be cases when a test can be used with a population related to the intended one; however, validity evidence and claims must be examined. We explored the use of student measures with preservice teachers (PSTs) in a teacher-education context. The present study intends to spark a discussion about using some student measures with teachers. The Problem-solving Measures (PSMs) were developed for use with grades 3-8 students. They measure students’ problem-solving performance within the context of the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (CCSSI, 2010; see Bostic & Sondergeld, 2015; Bostic et al., 2017; Bostic et al., 2021). After their construction, the developers wondered: If students were expected to engage successfully on the PSMs, then might future grades 3-8 teachers also demonstrate proficiency? 
    more » « less
  3. A. Lischka, E. Dyer (Ed.)
    Using a test for a purpose it was not intended for can promote misleading results and interpretations, potentially leading to negative consequences from testing (AERA et al., 2014). For example, a mathematics test designed for use with grade 7 students is likely inappropriate for use with grade 3 students. There may be cases when a test can be used with a population related to the intended one; however, validity evidence and claims must be examined. We explored the use of student measures with preservice teachers (PSTs) in a teacher-education context. The present study intends to spark a discussion about using some student measures with teachers. The Problem-solving Measures (PSMs) were developed for use with grades 3-8 students. They measure students’ problem-solving performance within the context of the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (CCSSI, 2010; see Bostic & Sondergeld, 2015; Bostic et al., 2017; Bostic et al., 2021). After their construction, the developers wondered: If students were expected to engage successfully on the PSMs, then might future grades 3-8 teachers also demonstrate proficiency? 
    more » « less
  4. Lischka, A ; Dyer, E. ; Jones, E. ; Lovett, J. ; Strayer, J. ; Drown, S. (Ed.)
    Using a test for a purpose it was not intended for can promote misleading results and interpretations, potentially leading to negative consequences from testing (AERA et al., 2014). For example, a mathematics test designed for use with grade 7 students is likely inappropriate for use with grade 3 students. There may be cases when a test can be used with a population related to the intended one; however, validity evidence and claims must be examined. We explored the use of student measures with preservice teachers (PSTs) in a teacher-education context. The present study intends to spark a discussion about using some student measures with teachers. The Problem-solving Measures (PSMs) were developed for use with grades 3-8 students. They measure students’ problem-solving performance within the context of the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (CCSSI, 2010; see Bostic & Sondergeld, 2015; Bostic et al., 2017; Bostic et al., 2021). After their construction, the developers wondered: If students were expected to engage successfully on the PSMs, then might future grades 3-8 teachers also demonstrate proficiency? 
    more » « less
  5. Lischka, A. E. ; Dyer, E. B. ; Jones, R. S. ; Lovett, J. ; Strayer, J. ; & Drown, S. (Ed.)
    Students exhibiting mature number sense make sense of numbers and operations, use reasoning to notice patterns, and flexibly select the most effective and efficient problem-solving strategies (McIntosh et al., 1997; Reys et al., 1999; Yang, 2005). Despite being highlighted in national standards and policy documents (CCSS, 2010; NCTM, 2000, 2014), students’ mature number sense and its nomological network are not yet well specified. For example, how does students’ mature number sense relate to their knowledge of fractions and their grade-level mathematics achievement? We analyzed 129 middle school students’ scores on measures of mature number sense, fraction and decimal computation, and grade-level mathematics achievement. We found mature number sense to be measurably distinct from their fraction and decimal knowledge and uniquely associated with students’ grade-level mathematics achievement. 
    more » « less