More Like this

1. Pseudorandomness from Shrinkage

   https://doi.org/10.1145/3230630  

   Impagliazzo, Russell; Meka, Raghu; Zuckerman, David (April 2019, Journal of the ACM)

   One powerful theme in complexity theory and pseudorandomness in the past few decades has been the use of lower bounds to give pseudorandom generators (PRGs). However, the general results using this hardness vs. randomness paradigm suffer from a quantitative loss in parameters, and hence do not give nontrivial implications for models where we don’t know super-polynomial lower bounds but do know lower bounds of a fixed polynomial. We show that when such lower bounds are proved using random restrictions, we can construct PRGs which are essentially best possible without in turn improving the lower bounds. More specifically, say that a circuit family has shrinkage exponent Γ if a random restriction leaving a p fraction of variables unset shrinks the size of any circuit in the family by a factor of p Γ + o (1) . Our PRG uses a seed of length s 1/(Γ + 1) + o (1) to fool circuits in the family of size s . By using this generic construction, we get PRGs with polynomially small error for the following classes of circuits of size s and with the following seed lengths: (1) For de Morgan formulas, seed length s 1/3+ o (1) ; (2) For formulas over an arbitrary basis, seed length s 1/2+ o (1) ; (3) For read-once de Morgan formulas, seed length s .234... ; (4) For branching programs of size s , seed length s 1/2+ o (1) . The previous best PRGs known for these classes used seeds of length bigger than n /2 to output n bits, and worked only for size s = O ( n ) [8]. 

   more » « less
2. Fooling Constant-Depth Threshold Circuits (Extended Abstract)

   https://doi.org/10.1109/FOCS52979.2021.00019  

   Hatami, Pooya; Hoza, William M.; Tal, Avishay; Tell, Roei (February 2022, Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science)

   We present new constructions of pseudorandom generators (PRGs) for two of the most widely studied non-uniform circuit classes in complexity theory. Our main result is a construction of the first non-trivial PRG for linear threshold (LTF) circuits of arbitrary constant depth and super-linear size. This PRG fools circuits with depth d∈N and n1+δ wires, where δ=2−O(d) , using seed length O(n1−δ) and with error 2−nδ . This tightly matches the best known lower bounds for this circuit class. As a consequence of our result, all the known hardness for LTF circuits has now effectively been translated into pseudorandomness. This brings the extensive effort in the last decade to construct PRGs and deterministic circuit-analysis algorithms for this class to the point where any subsequent improvement would yield breakthrough lower bounds. Our second contribution is a PRG for De Morgan formulas of size s whose seed length is s1/3+o(1)⋅polylog(1/ϵ) for error ϵ . In particular, our PRG can fool formulas of sub-cubic size s=n3−Ω(1) with an exponentially small error ϵ=exp(−nΩ(1)) . This significantly improves the inverse-polynomial error of the previous state-of-the-art for such formulas by Impagliazzo, Meka, and Zuckerman (FOCS 2012, JACM 2019), and again tightly matches the best currently-known lower bounds for this class. In both settings, a key ingredient in our constructions is a pseudorandom restriction procedure that has tiny failure probability, but simplifies the function to a non-natural “hybrid computational model” that combines several computational models. 

   more » « less
3. New Pseudorandom Generators and Correlation Bounds Using Extractors

   https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.68  

   Kumar, Vinayak M (January 2025, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik)

   Meka, Raghu (Ed.)

   We establish new correlation bounds and pseudorandom generators for a collection of computation models. These models are all natural generalization of structured low-degree polynomials that we did not have correlation bounds for before. In particular: - We construct a PRG for width-2 poly(n)-length branching programs which read d bits at a time with seed length 2^O(√{log n}) ⋅ d²log²(1/ε). This comes quadratically close to optimal dependence in d and log(1/ε). Improving the dependence on n would imply nontrivial PRGs for log n-degree 𝔽₂-polynomials. The previous PRG by Bogdanov, Dvir, Verbin, and Yehudayoff had an exponentially worse dependence on d with seed length of O(dlog n + d2^dlog(1/ε)). - We provide the first nontrivial (and nearly optimal) correlation bounds and PRGs against size-n^Ω(log n) AC⁰ circuits with either n^{.99} SYM gates (computing an arbitrary symmetric function) or n^{.49} THR gates (computing an arbitrary linear threshold function). This is a generalization of sparse 𝔽₂-polynomials, which can be simulated by an AC⁰ circuit with one parity gate at the top. Previous work of Servedio and Tan only handled n^{.49} SYM gates or n^{.24} THR gates, and previous work of Lovett and Srinivasan only handled polynomial-size circuits. - We give exponentially small correlation bounds against degree-n^O(1) 𝔽₂-polynomials which are set-multilinear over some arbitrary partition of the input into n^{1-O(1)} parts (noting that at n parts, we recover all low degree polynomials). This vastly generalizes correlation bounds against degree-d polynomials which are set-multilinear over a fixed partition into d blocks, which were established by Bhrushundi, Harsha, Hatami, Kopparty, and Kumar. The common technique behind all of these results is to fortify a hard function with the right type of extractor to obtain stronger correlation bounds for more general models of computation. Although this technique has been used in previous work, they rely on the model simplifying drastically under random restrictions. We view our results as a proof of concept that such fortification can be done even for classes that do not enjoy such behavior. 

   more » « less
4. Nearly Optimal Pseudorandomness from Hardness

   https://doi.org/10.1145/3555307  

   Doron, Dean; Moshkovitz, Dana; Oh, Justin; Zuckerman, David (December 2022, Journal of the ACM)

   Existing proofs that deduce BPP = P from circuit lower bounds convert randomized algorithms into deterministic algorithms with a large polynomial slowdown. We convert randomized algorithms into deterministic ones with little slowdown . Specifically, assuming exponential lower bounds against randomized NP ∩ coNP circuits, formally known as randomized SVN circuits, we convert any randomized algorithm over inputs of length n running in time t ≥ n into a deterministic one running in time t 2+α for an arbitrarily small constant α > 0. Such a slowdown is nearly optimal for t close to n , since under standard complexity-theoretic assumptions, there are problems with an inherent quadratic derandomization slowdown. We also convert any randomized algorithm that errs rarely into a deterministic algorithm having a similar running time (with pre-processing). The latter derandomization result holds under weaker assumptions, of exponential lower bounds against deterministic SVN circuits. Our results follow from a new, nearly optimal, explicit pseudorandom generator fooling circuits of size s with seed length (1+α)log s , under the assumption that there exists a function f ∈ E that requires randomized SVN circuits of size at least 2 (1-α′) n , where α = O (α)′. The construction uses, among other ideas, a new connection between pseudoentropy generators and locally list recoverable codes. 

   more » « less
5. Proof Complexity Lower Bounds from Algebraic Circuit Complexity

   https://doi.org/10.4086/toc.2021.v017a010  

   Forbes, Michael A.; Shpilka, Amir; Tzameret, Iddo; Wigderson, Avi (January 2021, Theory of Computing)

   Raz, Ran (Ed.)

   We give upper and lower bounds on the power of subsystems of the Ideal Proof System (IPS), the algebraic proof system recently proposed by Grochow and Pitassi, where the circuits comprising the proof come from various restricted algebraic circuit classes. This mimics an established research direction in the boolean setting for subsystems of Extended Frege proofs whose lines are circuits from restricted boolean circuit classes. Essentially all of the subsystems considered in this paper can simulate the well-studied Nullstellensatz proof system, and prior to this work there were no known lower bounds when measuring proof size by the algebraic complexity of the polynomials (except with respect to degree, or to sparsity). Our main contributions are two general methods of converting certain algebraic lower bounds into proof complexity ones. Both require stronger arithmetic lower bounds than common, which should hold not for a specific polynomial but for a whole family defined by it. These may be likened to some of the methods by which Boolean circuit lower bounds are turned into related proof-complexity ones, especially the "feasible interpolation" technique. We establish algebraic lower bounds of these forms for several explicit polynomials, against a variety of classes, and infer the relevant proof complexity bounds. These yield separations between IPS subsystems, which we complement by simulations to create a partial structure theory for IPS systems. Our first method is a functional lower bound, a notion of Grigoriev and Razborov, which is a function f' from n-bit strings to a field, such that any polynomial f agreeing with f' on the boolean cube requires large algebraic circuit complexity. We develop functional lower bounds for a variety of circuit classes (sparse polynomials, depth-3 powering formulas, read-once algebraic branching programs and multilinear formulas) where f'(x) equals 1/p(x) for a constant-degree polynomial p depending on the relevant circuit class. We believe these lower bounds are of independent interest in algebraic complexity, and show that they also imply lower bounds for the size of the corresponding IPS refutations for proving that the relevant polynomial p is non-zero over the boolean cube. In particular, we show super-polynomial lower bounds for refuting variants of the subset-sum axioms in these IPS subsystems. Our second method is to give lower bounds for multiples, that is, to give explicit polynomials whose all (non-zero) multiples require large algebraic circuit complexity. By extending known techniques, we give lower bounds for multiples for various restricted circuit classes such sparse polynomials, sums of powers of low-degree polynomials, and roABPs. These results are of independent interest, as we argue that lower bounds for multiples is the correct notion for instantiating the algebraic hardness versus randomness paradigm of Kabanets and Impagliazzo. Further, we show how such lower bounds for multiples extend to lower bounds for refutations in the corresponding IPS subsystem. 

   more » « less