An official website of the United States government
Globally, rapid population growth in cities, regulatory and governance failures, poor infrastructure, inadequate funding for urban water systems, and the impacts of climate change are each rapidly reconfiguring regional hydrosocial relations. In the United States, these hydrosocial reconfigurations tend to reinforce racial inequalities tied to infrastructure, exacerbating environmental injustices. More generally, according to a framework of racial capitalism, infrastructural regions and hydrosocial relations are always already racialized and structured simultaneously by capitalism and racism. In this paper, we integrate hydrosocial and racial justice perspectives with the literature on infrastructural regionalism to examine Atlanta’s position in the so-called tri-state water wars between Alabama, Georgia and Florida. Combining analysis of academic, policy, and legal documents, journalistic accounts, and semi-structured interviews with water conservationists and managers working in Atlanta, we examine conflicts over water use in the infrastructural region of the Apalachicola–Chattahoochee–Flint (ACF) river system. We emphasize that the ACF conflict reworks regional hydrosocial relations through territorializations of racial capitalism. We demonstrate how particular discourses that reify Atlanta as a monolith overly simplify the regional dimensions of the crisis, diminishing the views, roles and interventions of diverse actors in the ACF region. We argue that work on infrastructure regionalism and water governance can be deepened through attention to the hydro-racial fix.
more »
« less
Spatio-Temporality and Tribal Water Quality Governance in the United States
Hydrosocial spatio-temporalities—aspects of water belonging to space, time, or space-time—are central to water governance, providing a framework upon which overall hydrosocial relations are constructed, and are fundamental to the establishment of values and central to socio-cultural-political relationships. Moreover, spatio-temporal conceptions may differ among diverse governing entities and across scales, creating “variability” through ontological pluralism, as well as power asymmetries embedded in cultural bias. This paper explores spatio-temporal conceptions related to water quality governance, an aspect of water governance often biased toward technical and scientific space-time conceptions. We offer examples of different aspects of spatio-temporality in water quality issues among Tribes in the United States, highlighting several themes, including spatiotemporal cycles, technological mediation, and interrelationship and fluidity. Finally, we suggest that because water is part of a dynamic network of space-times, water quality may be best governed through more holistic practices that recognize tribal sovereignty and hydrosocial variability.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1636533
- PAR ID:
- 10112266
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Water
- Volume:
- 11
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 2073-4441
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 99
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract Zooplankton play an integral role as indicators of water quality in freshwater ecosystems, but exhibit substantial variability in their density and community composition over space and time. This variability in zooplankton community structure may be driven by multiple factors, including taxon-specific migration behavior in response to environmental conditions. Many studies have highlighted substantial variability in zooplankton communities across spatial and temporal scales, but the relative importance of space vs. time in structuring zooplankton community dynamics is less understood. In this study, we quantified spatial (a littoral vs. a pelagic site) and temporal (hours to years) variability in zooplankton community structure in a eutrophic reservoir in southwestern Virginia, USA. We found that zooplankton community structure was more variable among sampling dates over 3 years than among sites or hours of the day, which was associated with differences in water temperature, chlorophyll a, and nutrient concentrations. Additionally, we observed high variability in zooplankton migration behavior, though a slightly greater magnitude of DHM vs. DVM during each sampling date, likely due to changing environmental conditions. Ultimately, our work underscores the need to continually integrate spatial and temporal monitoring to understand patterns of zooplankton community structure and behavior in freshwater ecosystems.more » « less
-
ABSTRACT The deterioration of stream water quality threatens ecosystems and human water security worldwide. Effective risk assessment and mitigation requires spatial and temporal data from water quality monitoring networks (WQMNs). However, it remains challenging to quantify how well current WQMNs capture the spatiotemporal variability of stream water quality, making their evaluation and optimisation an important task for water management. Here, we investigate the spatial and temporal variability of concentrations of three constituents, representing different input pathways: anthropogenic (NO3−), geogenic (Ca2+) and biogenic (total organic carbon, TOC) at 1215 stations in three major river basins in Germany. We present a typology to classify each constituent on the basis of magnitude, range and dominance of spatial versus temporal variability. We found that mean measures of spatial variability dominated over those for temporal variability for NO3−and Ca2+, while for TOC they were approximately equal. The observed spatiotemporal patterns were robustly explained by a combination of local landscape composition and network‐scale landscape heterogeneity, as well as the degree of spatial auto‐correlation of water quality. Our analysis suggests that river network position systematically influences the inference of spatial variability more than temporal variability. By employing a space–time variance framework, this study provides a step towards optimising WQMNs to create water quality data sets that are balanced in time and space, ultimately improving the efficiency of resource allocation and maximising the value of the information obtained.more » « less
-
Abstract Protecting surface water quality can be complicated by high spatiotemporal variability. Pollutant sources and transport pathways may be identified through sufficiently high‐density monitoring sites and high‐frequency sampling, but practical considerations necessitate tradeoffs between spatial and temporal resolution in water quality monitoring network design. We examined how tradeoffs in sampling density and frequency affect measures of spatiotemporal variability in water quality, emphasizing pattern stability over time. We quantified the spatial stability of stream water quality across >250 monitoring sites in the intensively monitored watershed draining to Lake Okeechobee, FL using Spearman's rank correlations between instantaneous observations and site long‐term means for each parameter. We found that water quality spatial patterns for geogenic, biogenic, and anthropogenic parameters were generally stable on decadal timescales for all solutes, and that sampling densely in space yields more information than sampling frequently in time. Variations in spatial stability decreased with increased sampling density but not with greater sampling frequency, attesting to the dominance of spatial variability over temporal variability. For nutrients, the spatial coefficient of variation (CV) was approximately double the temporal CV. Spatial stability of most solutes was similar across flow conditions, but high‐flow monitoring allows for more sites that effectively capture the long‐term spatial patterns of nutrient sources. Water quality monitoring regimes can be optimized for efficiency in capturing water quality patterns and should be adjusted to focus more on spatial variation. We discuss potential improvements for water quality monitoring, particularly in watersheds where scarce resources necessitate tradeoffs between sampling density and frequency.more » « less
-
Abstract Energy transitions are reshaping hydrosocial relations. How they will be reshaped, however, depends on location and water's material relationship to other resources and industrial activities embedded within energy transitions. To highlight this, we focus on three different resources—coal, natural gas, and lithium—to signal how the water–energy nexus will be reworked in a transition away from fossil fuels. We examine the water–coal nexus as an example of a resource relationship that is transitioningout, or that is being moved away from in the green energy transition. Natural gas represents the “bridge fuel” usedthroughthe transition. Lithium illustrates a resourceinsidethe green transition, as it is a fundamental material for green technologiesinthe transition to a low‐carbon future. Coal, natural gas, and lithium each have their own material impacts to water resources that stem from their industrial lifecycle and different implications for communities shaped by coal, natural gas, and lithium activities. To explore this, we review each of these resources' connection to water, their legal and regulatory dimensions, and their impact on communities and water justice. We argue that the energy transition is also a hydrosocial transition that will create uneven water‐related benefits and burdens. To maximize sustainability and equity, efforts to decarbonize energy systems must examine the localized, place‐based hydrosocial relations that differentially affect communities. This article is categorized under:Engineering Water > Planning WaterHuman Water > Water GovernanceHuman Water > Rights to Watermore » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.3390/w11010099
