Generalist primates eat many food types and shift their diet with changes in food availability. Variation in foods eaten may not, however, match variation in nutrient intake. We examined dietary variation in a generalist‐feeder, the blue monkey (
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10117146
- Publisher / Repository:
- Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- American Journal of Primatology
- Volume:
- 81
- Issue:
- 7
- ISSN:
- 0275-2565
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
Previous observational research on primate feeding ecology has demonstrated that some primates consume fruit in the morning and leaves in the afternoon. However, diurnal patterning of feeding bouts has not been demonstrated for many of the apes, nor for relatively solitary primates. Furthermore, whether this has nutritional consequences is unclear. Orangutans are largely frugivorous omnivores that also incorporate leaves, bark, pith, and insects in their diet. As primarily solitary animals, their foraging and food choices are not restricted by group size and group decisions – thus they provide an excellent species with which to examine individual ape foraging choices. In accord with previous research, we hypothesized that orangutans would select energy rich and easy to digest foods (i.e., fruit) in the morning, then move to leaves and more fibrous food sources later in the day in order to allow more digestion time, and possibly to gain necessary macronutrients at the optimal time. We examined whether orangutans exhibited diurnal patterning of feeding bouts using 51 full day follows of wild Bornean orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii) occurring May 2015 – January 2016 at Gunung Palung National Park, West Kalimantan, Indonesia. While there is a statistically significant difference in food types eaten at different times of day (χ2 = 76.3, p = 0.03), this difference is driven by increased consumption of leaves and pith in the afternoon hours, while fruit is consistently consumed throughout the day. We discuss this in the contexts of optimal nutrient selection and the Geometric Framework of Nutrition. Funding: National Science Foundation (BCS-1638823; BCS-1613393), NSF GRFP (DGE-1247312); Boston University; National Geographic Society, US Fish and Wildlife (F15AP00812), Leakey Foundation, Disney Wildlife Conservation Fund; Wenner-Gren Foundation; Nacey-Maggioncalda Foundationmore » « less
-
For species with low mortality and high reproductive costs, like primates, rather than maximize reproduction, natural selection should favor slow growth and slow reproductive rates. Orangutans, because of their slow life history, and the extreme fluctuations in their food supply, are hypothesized to have been selected for slow juvenile development to avoid ecological risk. Juveniles are predicted to be particularly vulnerable during periods of low food availability because of lower foraging success. Thus, we tested the hypothesis that juvenile orangutans are less efficient foragers than adults and that they are less able to both access and digest important fall-back foods. Data were collected on wild orangutans in Gunung Palung National Park, Borneo, Indonesia between 1994-2016. Analyses are drawn from 468 matched follows of mother-offspring pairs in which more than 75% of the diet has been analyzed. We found that juveniles ate fruit when their mother’s ate fruit during 98.3% of bouts. However, for other food items, juveniles were much less likely to eat the same food items (insects = 65.2%, leaves 76.5, bark 70.0%, flowers 75.0%, pith 65.8%). As expected, we found that juveniles ate significantly fewer calories than did adults overall, but this difference was particularly pronounced during periods of low food availability (p < 0.001). We show that these results were due to constraints on both the processing and digesting of fall-back foods. Thus, the long period of orangutan growth and dependency may reflect a risk-averse growth strategy in this forest characterized by dramatic fluctuations in preferred fruits.more » « less
-
For species with low mortality and high reproductive costs, like primates, rather than maximize reproduction, natural selection should favor slow growth and slow reproductive rates. Orangutans, because of their slow life history, and the extreme fluctuations in their food supply, are hypothesized to have been selected for slow juvenile development to avoid ecological risk. Juveniles are predicted to be particularly vulnerable during periods of low food availability because of lower foraging success. Thus, we tested the hypothesis that juvenile orangutans are less efficient foragers than adults and that they are less able to both access and digest important fall-back foods. Data were collected on wild orangutans in Gunung Palung National Park, Borneo, Indonesia between 1994-2016. Analyses are drawn from 468 matched follows of mother-offspring pairs in which more than 75% of the diet has been analyzed. We found that juveniles ate fruit when their mother’s ate fruit during 98.3% of bouts. However, for other food items, juveniles were much less likely to eat the same food items (insects = 65.2%, leaves 76.5, bark 70.0%, flowers 75.0%, pith 65.8%). As expected, we found that juveniles ate significantly fewer calories than did adults overall, but this difference was particularly pronounced during periods of low food availability (p < 0.001). We show that these results were due to constraints on both the processing and digesting of fall-back foods. Thus, the long period of orangutan growth and dependency may reflect a risk-averse growth strategy in this forest characterized by dramatic fluctuations in preferred fruits.more » « less
-
Abstract Objectives Sodium, a vital micronutrient that is often in scarce supply for tropical herbivores, is sometimes found at high concentration in decaying wood. We tested two hypotheses for chimpanzees: first, that wood‐eating facilitates acquisition of sodium; second, that wood‐eating occurs in response to the low availability of sodium from other dietary sources.
Materials and Methods We studied the behavior of more than 50 chimpanzees of all age‐sex classes in the Kanyawara community of Kibale National Park, Uganda. We quantified the sodium content of dietary items, including wood samples from tree species that chimpanzees consumed or did not consume. To assess variation in sodium intake, we used 7 years of data on time spent feeding on plant foods, 18 months of data on rates of food intake by adult females, and 20 years of data on meat‐eating.
Results Major dietary sources of sodium were wood, fruits and meat. Chimpanzees consumed wood primarily from decaying trees of
Neoboutonia macrocalyx (Euphorbiaceae), which had substantially higher sodium content than all other dietary items tested. Wood‐eating was negatively correlated with fruit‐eating. Females ate wood more often than males, while males had a greater probability of consuming meat at predation events.Discussion We propose that females ate wood more often than males because females had reduced access to meat, their preferred source of sodium. This hypothesis suggests that the need for sodium is a motivating reason for chimpanzees to consume both meat and wood.
-
Abstract Despite widespread variation in life span across species, three clear patterns exist: sex differences in life span are ubiquitous, life span is commonly traded against reproduction, and nutrition has a major influence on these traits and how they trade‐off. One process that potentially unites these patterns is intralocus sexual conflict over the optimal intake of nutrients for life span and reproduction. If nutrient intake has sex‐specific effects on life span and reproduction but nutrient choice is genetically linked across the sexes, intralocus sexual conflict will occur and may prevent one or both sexes from feeding to their nutritional optima.
Here we determine the potential for this process to operate in the decorated cricket
Gryllodes sigillatus . Using the Geometric Framework for Nutrition, we restrict male and female crickets to diets varying in the ratio of protein to carbohydrates and total nutrient content to quantify the effects on life span and daily reproductive effort in the sexes. We then use inbred lines to estimate the quantitative genetic basis of nutrient choice in males and females. We combine the nutrient effects and genetic estimates to predict the magnitude of evolutionary constraint for these traits in each sex. Finally, we present male and female crickets with a much broader range of diet pairs to determine how the sexes actively regulate their intake of nutrients.We show that protein and carbohydrate intake have contrasting effects on life span and reproduction in the sexes and that there are strong positive intersexual genetic correlations for the intake of these nutrients under dietary choice. This is predicted to accelerate the evolutionary response of nutrient intake in males but constrain it in females, suggesting they are losing the conflict. Supporting this view, males and females regulate nutrient intake to a common nutrient ratio that was not perfectly optimal for life span or reproduction in either sex, especially in females.
Our findings show that intralocus sexual conflict over the optimal intake of nutrients is likely to be an important process generating sex differences in life span and reproduction and may help explain why females age faster and live shorter than males in
G. sigillatus .A free
Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.