skip to main content


Title: What’s for dinner? Diurnal variation in wild Bornean orangutan food and nutrient choices
Previous observational research on primate feeding ecology has demonstrated that some primates consume fruit in the morning and leaves in the afternoon. However, diurnal patterning of feeding bouts has not been demonstrated for many of the apes, nor for relatively solitary primates. Furthermore, whether this has nutritional consequences is unclear. Orangutans are largely frugivorous omnivores that also incorporate leaves, bark, pith, and insects in their diet. As primarily solitary animals, their foraging and food choices are not restricted by group size and group decisions – thus they provide an excellent species with which to examine individual ape foraging choices. In accord with previous research, we hypothesized that orangutans would select energy rich and easy to digest foods (i.e., fruit) in the morning, then move to leaves and more fibrous food sources later in the day in order to allow more digestion time, and possibly to gain necessary macronutrients at the optimal time. We examined whether orangutans exhibited diurnal patterning of feeding bouts using 51 full day follows of wild Bornean orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii) occurring May 2015 – January 2016 at Gunung Palung National Park, West Kalimantan, Indonesia. While there is a statistically significant difference in food types eaten at different times of day (χ2 = 76.3, p = 0.03), this difference is driven by increased consumption of leaves and pith in the afternoon hours, while fruit is consistently consumed throughout the day. We discuss this in the contexts of optimal nutrient selection and the Geometric Framework of Nutrition. Funding: National Science Foundation (BCS-1638823; BCS-1613393), NSF GRFP (DGE-1247312); Boston University; National Geographic Society, US Fish and Wildlife (F15AP00812), Leakey Foundation, Disney Wildlife Conservation Fund; Wenner-Gren Foundation; Nacey-Maggioncalda Foundation  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1638823
NSF-PAR ID:
10067611
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
87th Annual Meeting of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists
Page Range / eLocation ID:
68
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii) in Gunung Palung National Park, West Kalimantan, Indonesia experience significant seasonal and annual fluctuations in the availability of their preferred food, ripe fruit. When ripe fruit is limited, orangutans increase their consumption of bark, pith, and leaves, which are continuously available and may act as fallback foods. While these foods are presumed to be less nutritious, it is not clear whether this is the case. Free simple sugars (FSS) provide orangutans with readily-metabolizable energy, and are thus an important nutritional compound for food choice. Here, we examine FSS concentrations in a variety of orangutan foods (n=54) to better understand orangutan foraging and nutritional ecology. We predicted that preferred foods would have higher concentrations of FSS than fallback foods. We analyzed FSS concentrations using a modified phenol-sulfuric acid method, and tested sample absorbency using a spectrophotometer at 490 nm. We analyzed 54 samples from 48 species, examining six plant parts: bark, flowers, leaves, pulp, seeds, and skin/pulp. Although preliminary results indicated no statistically significant differences in sugar content across the six food categories (F(5,47)=1.78, p=0.14), we did find that preferred foods (fruit pulp and seeds) had an average sugar concentration that was significantly higher (4.7%) than fallback foods (leaves and bark) (t=2.355, p=0.04). Therefore, as predicted, we find that orangutans prefer food types with higher concentrations of FSS. Obtaining adequate caloric and nutritional intake is crucial for orangutan reproduction and development, and thus this study provides new insight into what drives orangutan dietary choices. National Science Foundation (BCS-1638823, BCS-0936199, 9414388), National Geographic Society, US Fish and Wildlife (F15AP00812, F12AP00369, 98210-8-G661), Leakey Foundation, Disney Wildlife Conservation Fund, Wenner-Gren Foundation, Nacey- Maggioncalda Foundation. 
    more » « less
  2. null (Ed.)
    In 2015, Lambert and Rothman urged primate nutritional ecologists to revise the view of fallback and optimal foods from stable traits inherent in the food to variable qualities determined by the state of the consumer. Here we provide behavioral evidence to support this revision. In primates, fruit is often the preferred food category because it is typically high-energy, high-carbohydrate, and low in fiber. Orangutans in particular, are said to consume fruit preferentially and when it is available, whereas leaves, bark, and pith are often considered fallback foods. Using movement ecology, we ask if wild Bornean orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii) navigate only to fruit, or whether navigation to non-fruit foods is supported by our data. We find that orangutans do deviate from a direct fruit-to-fruit path to consume non-fruit foods (n = 54, range 8% - 84%; p = 6.819e-07.) Next, we ask if orangutans consume non-fruit foods when in the proximity of fruit resources. We find that 25.5% of the time that orangutans eat a non-fruit food, there is an available fruit within 50m (n=308). Building on previous research finding that orangutans maintain a 10.1:1 NPE:P balance, we use this geospatial data showing that orangutans navigate to and choose non-fruit foods, even when fruit is available, to suggest that orangutans are seeking foods based on their current nutritional state and not only to maximize energy. This supports the claim that 'fallback' is not an inherent characteristic of a food, but rather is in the state-dependent eye of the consumer. Funders: National Science Foundation (BCS-1638823; BCS-1613393), NSF GRFP (DGE-1247312); Boston University; National Geographic Society, US Fish and Wildlife (F15AP00812), Leakey Foundation, Disney Wildlife Conservation Fund; Wenner-Gren Foundation; Nacey-Maggioncalda Foundation, Princeton University 
    more » « less
  3. null (Ed.)
    In 2015, Lambert and Rothman urged primate nutritional ecologists to revise the view of fallback and optimal foods from stable traits inherent in the food to variable qualities determined by the state of the consumer. Here we provide behavioral evidence to support this revision. In primates, fruit is often the preferred food category because it is typically high-energy, high-carbohydrate, and low in fiber. Orangutans in particular, are said to consume fruit preferentially and when it is available, whereas leaves, bark, and pith are often considered fallback foods. Using movement ecology, we ask if wild Bornean orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii) navigate only to fruit, or whether navigation to non-fruit foods is supported by our data. We find that orangutans do deviate from a direct fruit-to-fruit path to consume non-fruit foods (n = 54, range 8% - 84%; p = 6.819e-07.) Next, we ask if orangutans consume non-fruit foods when in the proximity of fruit resources. We find that 25.5% of the time that orangutans eat a non-fruit food, there is an available fruit within 50m (n=308). Building on previous research finding that orangutans maintain a 10.1:1 NPE:P balance, we use this geospatial data showing that orangutans navigate to and choose non-fruit foods, even when fruit is available, to suggest that orangutans are seeking foods based on their current nutritional state and not only to maximize energy. This supports the claim that 'fallback' is not an inherent characteristic of a food, but rather is in the state-dependent eye of the consumer. Funders: National Science Foundation (BCS-1638823; BCS-1613393), NSF GRFP (DGE-1247312); Boston University; National Geographic Society, US Fish and Wildlife (F15AP00812), Leakey Foundation, Disney Wildlife Conservation Fund; Wenner-Gren Foundation; Nacey-Maggioncalda Foundation, Princeton University 
    more » « less
  4. Bornean orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii) preferentially eat pulp and mesocarp when fleshy fruit is abundant. However, during non-masting periods, orangutans rely on foods that can be mechanically challenging, including leaves, woody plant tissue, and seeds. Although adult orangutans’ jaws are well adapted for intense and, perhaps, repetitive loading during chewing, it may be easier for flanged adult males to process tough or hard foods than for adult females because of dramatic sexual dimorphism. Here, we use video data and in situ focalobservations from Gunung Palung National Park, West Kalimantan, Indonesia to test the hypotheses that orangutans exhibit food- and sex-specific oral processing profiles. Pilot data (n=94 feeding bouts; 76 adult females, 18 adult males) suggest no significant differences in use of incisors (F(3,71)=0.41, p=0.75), canines (F(3,71)=0.78, p=0.52), or molars (F(3,71)=0.88, p=0.46) per ingestive action while processing fruit, leaves, termites, or bark. Females used significantly more incisions per ingestive action (2.20) than males (1.01) (t=2.44, p=0.008), and, though differences were not significant, performed more canine bites (female mean=0.08, male mean=0.00, p=0.17) and mastications (female mean=4.88, male mean=3.95, p=0.24) per ingestive action than males. We detected no difference in the behaviors used by orangutans to process different food types, despite great variation in food mechanical properties. However, this may be because our pilot data did not capture the range of mechanical challenges in orangutan diets. Nevertheless, our preliminary results support the hypothesis that adult females work harder than flanged males during oral food processing, explicable due to sexual dimorphism. National Science Foundation (BCS-1638823, BCS-0936199); National Geographic Society; US Fish and Wildlife (F15AP00812, F12AP00369, 98210-8- G661); Leakey Foundation; Disney Wildlife Conservation Fund; Wenner-Gren Foundation; Nacey-Maggioncalda Foundation 
    more » « less
  5. For species with low mortality and high reproductive costs, like primates, rather than maximize reproduction, natural selection should favor slow growth and slow reproductive rates. Orangutans, because of their slow life history, and the extreme fluctuations in their food supply, are hypothesized to have been selected for slow juvenile development to avoid ecological risk. Juveniles are predicted to be particularly vulnerable during periods of low food availability because of lower foraging success. Thus, we tested the hypothesis that juvenile orangutans are less efficient foragers than adults and that they are less able to both access and digest important fall-back foods. Data were collected on wild orangutans in Gunung Palung National Park, Borneo, Indonesia between 1994-2016. Analyses are drawn from 468 matched follows of mother-offspring pairs in which more than 75% of the diet has been analyzed. We found that juveniles ate fruit when their mother’s ate fruit during 98.3% of bouts. However, for other food items, juveniles were much less likely to eat the same food items (insects = 65.2%, leaves 76.5, bark 70.0%, flowers 75.0%, pith 65.8%). As expected, we found that juveniles ate significantly fewer calories than did adults overall, but this difference was particularly pronounced during periods of low food availability (p < 0.001). We show that these results were due to constraints on both the processing and digesting of fall-back foods. Thus, the long period of orangutan growth and dependency may reflect a risk-averse growth strategy in this forest characterized by dramatic fluctuations in preferred fruits. 
    more » « less