Leaping is an important locomotor behavior for arboreal taxa such as primates, providing means to cross discontinuous substrates, escape predation, and/or capture prey. Primates that leap frequently have relatively longer hindlimbs than those taxa that leap less often. However, it is unknown if this pattern holds across a broader phylogenetic sample that includes non-primate arboreal taxa and non-primate specialized leapers. Here, we examine if relative hindlimb length and segmental proportions correlate with locomotor category across a sample of small-bodied (800g) mammals. Lengths of six hindlimb elements (summing to total hindlimb length) were measured on micro-computed tomography scans. Total hindlimb length was regressed against body mass to calculate relative hindlimb length. Segmental proportions were calculated as the ratio of femoral, tibial, and pedal (the sum of calcaneal, cuboidal, metatarsal, and phalangeal lengths) lengths to total hindlimb length. We found that while three arboreal/scansorial taxa (common marmosets, greater dwarf lemurs, and palm squirrels) exhibit short hindlimbs relative to their body mass, all other arboreal and scansorial taxa have relatively long hindlimbs. Most arboreal, scansorial, terrestrial, and fossorial taxa distribute length evenly across segments (femur, tibia, and pes each comprise 33% of total hindlimb length). Saltatorialists (e.g., jerboas and kangaroo rats) were the only locomotor group with exceptional proportions, with pedal segments contributing 38% of total hindlimb length. These results suggest to us that segmental proportions may distinguish specialized ricochetal hoppers from taxa that leap sporadically, while relative hindlimb length may predict general leaping ability across mammals. 
                        more » 
                        « less   
                    
                            
                            A simple skeletal measurement effectively predicts climbing behaviour in a diverse clade of small mammals
                        
                    
    
            Abstract Arboreal locomotion allows access to above-ground resources and might have fostered the diversification of mammals. Nevertheless, simple morphological measurements that consistently correlate with arboreality remain indefinable. As such, the climbing habits of many species of mammals, living and extinct, remain speculative. We collected quantitative data on the climbing tendencies of 20 species of murine rodents, an ecologically and morphologically diverse clade. We leveraged Bayesian phylogenetic mixed models (BPMMs), incorporating intraspecific variation and phylogenetic uncertainty, to determine which, if any, traits (17 skeletal indices) predict climbing frequency. We used ordinal BPMMs to test the ability of the indices to place 48 murine species that lack quantitative climbing data into three qualitative locomotor categories (terrestrial, general and arboreal). Only two indices (both measures of relative digit length) accurately predict locomotor styles, with manus digit length showing the best fit. Manus digit length has low phylogenetic signal, is largely explained by locomotor ecology and might effectively predict locomotion across a multitude of small mammals, including extinct species. Surprisingly, relative tail length, a common proxy for locomotion, was a poor predictor of climbing. In general, detailed, quantitative natural history data, such as those presented here, are needed to enhance our understanding of the evolutionary and ecological success of clades. 
        more » 
        « less   
        
    
    
                            - PAR ID:
- 10118083
- Publisher / Repository:
- Oxford University Press
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
- ISSN:
- 0024-4066
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
- 
            
- 
            ABSTRACT While most mammals have whiskers, some tactile specialists—mainly small, nocturnal, and arboreal species—can actively move their whiskers in a symmetrical, cyclic movement called whisking. Whisking enables mammals to rapidly, tactually scan their environment to efficiently guide locomotion and foraging in complex habitats. The muscle architecture that enables whisking is preserved from marsupials to primates, prompting researchers to suggest that a common ancestor might have had moveable whiskers. Studying the evolution of whisker touch sensing is difficult, and we suggest that measuring an aspect of skull morphology that correlates with whisking would enable comparisons between extinct and extant mammals. We find that whisking mammals have larger infraorbital foramen (IOF) areas, which indicates larger infraorbital nerves and an increase in sensory acuity. While this relationship is quite variable and IOF area cannot be used to solely predict the presence of whisking, whisking mammals all have large IOF areas. Generally, this pattern holds true regardless of an animal's substrate preferences or activity patterns. Data from fossil mammals and ancestral character state reconstruction and tracing techniques for extant mammals suggest that whisking is not the ancestral state for therian mammals. Instead, whisking appears to have evolved independently as many as seven times across the clades Marsupialia, Afrosoricida, Eulipotyphla, and Rodentia, with Xenarthra the only placental superordinal clade lacking whisking species. However, the term whisking only captures symmetrical and rhythmic movements of the whiskers, rather than all possible whisker movements, and early mammals may still have had moveable whiskers. Anat Rec, 2018. © 2018 American Association for Anatomy.more » « less
- 
            Abstract Arboreal locomotion is precarious and places multiple challenges upon stability. Studies have shown that captive primates respond to narrower and steeper supports by flexing limb joints and adopting a compliant gait. We tested whether these same kinematic responses are adopted by wild primates freely ranging over a variety of supports in their natural habitats. We recorded five species of platyrrhines, five species of catarrhines, and four species of strepsirrhines with modified GoPro cameras and used remote measurement to quantify substrate characteristics. Video images were imported into ImageJ to measure the angular kinematics of limb joints during quadrupedal locomotion on a variety of arboreal supports. We statistically tested for associations between joint posture and substrate characteristics, and then disentangled the influence of phylogeny and substrate on limb joint kinematics using variation partitioning and redundancy analysis. Our results partially confirm previous kinematic studies and suggest variation in support orientation, more than diameter or compliance, influences quadrupedal gait kinematics. Phylogenetic relatedness explained more variation in the data than substrate properties. This suggests primates either prospectively choose relatively ‘safe’ substrates for locomotion, or that they possess locomotor adaptations independent of limb joint kinematics per se to overcome the challenges of the precarious arboreal environment.more » « less
- 
            Abstract Horses are a classic example of macroevolution in three major traits—large body size, tall-crowned teeth (hypsodonty), and a single toe (monodactyly)—but how and why monodactyly evolved is still poorly understood. Existing hypotheses usually connect digit reduction in horses to the spread and eventual dominance of open-habitat grasslands, which took over from forests during the Cenozoic; digit reduction has been argued to be an adaptation for speed, locomotor economy, stability, and/or increased body size. In this review, we assess the evidence for these (not necessarily mutually exclusive) hypotheses from a variety of related fields, including paleoecology, phylogenetic comparative methods, and biomechanics. Convergent evolution of digit reduction, including in litopterns and artiodactyls, is also considered. We find it unlikely that a single evolutionary driver was responsible for the evolution of monodactyly, because changes in body size, foot posture, habitat, and substrate are frequently found to influence one another (and to connect to broader potential drivers, such as changing climate). We conclude with suggestions for future research to help untangle the complex dynamics of this remarkable morphological change in extinct horses. A path forward should combine regional paleoecology studies, quantitative biomechanical work, and make use of convergence and modern analogs to estimate the relative contributions of potential evolutionary drivers for digit reduction.more » « less
- 
            Much research on primate locomotor performance in arboreal settings focuses on how primate morphology allows them to navigate substrates that vary in diameter, orientation, and compliance. However, little prior research has considered how these and other environmental factors - such as substrate height and light availability - may also affect locomotor behavior by altering how risky a given substrate is perceived to be. To investigate the relationship between risk perception and locomotor performance, we video-recorded four species of wild lemur (Ranomafana National Park), three species of wild cercopithecoid monkeys (Kibale National Park), and four species of captive lemur (Duke Lemur Center). We test the general hypothesis that primates should change their gaits and engage in exploratory behaviors – using touch and sight as guides – to increase stability in precarious settings. Augmenting our prior study showing that some lemurs change their locomotion when moving high in the canopy, we present new data showing that wild lemurs and monkeys frequently cross gaps between substrates and transition between locomotor modes without pause. In the investigation on captive lemurs, we examine whether variations in branch diameter, compliance, orientation, and light availability influence the paths lemurs choose to take. Preliminary results suggest that lemurs tend to avoid the most precarious substrates (i.e., the most narrow and compliant) regardless of lighting conditions. Overall, this research indicates that primates are able to make quick and accurate judgements about locomotor safety in the context of ongoing arboreal locomotion.more » « less
 An official website of the United States government
An official website of the United States government 
				
			 
					 
					
