An official website of the United States government
Understanding the molecular mechanisms that underlie snake venom variability provides important clues for understanding how the biological functions of this powerful toxic arsenal evolve. Here we analyzed in detail individual transcripts and venom protein isoforms produced by five specimens of a venomous snake (Bothrops atrox) from two nearby but genetically distinct populations from the Brazilian Amazon rainforest showing functional similarities in venom properties. Individual variation was observed among the venoms of these specimens, but the overall abundance of each general toxin family was conserved both in transcripts and in venom protein levels. However, when expression of independent paralogues was analyzed, remarkable differences were observed within and among each toxin group both between individuals and between populations. Transcripts for functionally essential venom proteins (“housekeeping” proteins) are highly expressed in all specimens and show similar transcription/translation rates. In contrast, other paralogues show lower expression levels and the toxins they code for vary among different individuals. These results provide support for the idea that that expression and translational differences play a greater role in defining adaptive variation in venom phenotypes than does sequence variation in protein coding genes and that convergent adaptive venom phenotypes can be generated through different molecular mechanisms.
more »
« less
Behavioral variation, adaptation, and evolution
Individual animals behave differently from each other for myriad interrelated intrinsic and extrinsic reasons, and this behavioral variation is the raw substrate for evolutionary change. Behavioral varia- tion can both enhance and constrain long-term evolution (Foster, 2013), and it provides the basic materials on which natural and sexual selection can act. A rich body of historical experimental and conceptual foundations precedes many of the topics discussed. This classic literature is vast and impor- tant, and we encourage the reader to examine it in detail (e.g., Lehrman, 1953; Lorenz, 1971; Schnei- rla, 1966; Waddington, 1959) because we discuss more recent literature. For example, the study of the mechanisms that underlie behavioral variation has a divisive history, which involves carving out the relative contributions of genes and environment to a particular phenotype. Developmental systems and reaction-norm views challenged the issue of gene or environment by arguing that the interplay between genetic substrates and environmental inputs defined adaptive phenotypes across multiple contexts (Fos- ter, 2013; Gottlieb, 1991a, 1991b; Jablonka & Lamb, 2014). Identifying the interactional relationship between components permits researchers to under- stand how behavior becomes organized (Gottlieb, 1991a, 1991b) and can reveal links between indi- vidual variation and population-level persistence, species diversification (or stasis), and community dynamics (reviewed in Dingemanse & Wolf, 2013). Similarly, the study of individual differences has a rich history situated in the areas of behavioral genet- ics, sociobiology, behavioral ecology, developmen- tal psychology, personality theory, and studies of learning and cognition. Each area has its own goals, associated techniques, and levels of explanation. The study of behavioral variation during early develop- ment, for instance, has been documented primarily by psychologists studying proximate mechanisms in laboratory animal models, whereas the study of dif- ferent adult morphs using the adaptationist perspec- tive has been dominated by behavioral ecologists examining natural populations (Foster, 1995). A more complete description of individual differences requires an integrative study of the mechanisms (e.g., developmental, physiological) that guide intra- individual flexibility and the associated adaptive fine tuning of behavioral types. It is through this integra- tion that researchers can make predictions about the response of different individual phenotypes, groups, populations, and species to novel situations (e.g., captive and urban environments).
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1611616
- PAR ID:
- 10122457
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- APA
- ISSN:
- 1412-5242
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Plant communities are composed of complex phenotypes that not only differ among taxonomic groups and habitats but also change over time within a species. Restoration projects (e.g. translocations and reseeding) can introduce new functional variation in plants, which further diversifies phenotypes and complicates our ability to identify locally adaptive phenotypes for future restoration. Near‐infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) offers one approach to detect the chemical phenotypes that differentiate plant species, populations, and phenological states of individual plants over time. We use sagebrush (Artemisiaspp.) as a case study to test the accuracy by which NIRS can classify variation within taxonomy and phenology of a plant that is extensively managed and restored. Our results demonstrated that NIRS can accurately classify species of sagebrush within a study site (75–96%), populations of sagebrush within a subspecies (99%), annual phenology within a population (>99%), and seasonal phenology within individual plants (>97%). Low classification accuracy by NIRS in some sites may reflect heterogeneity associated with natural hybridization, translocation of nonlocal seed sources from past restoration, or complex gene‐by‐environment interactions. Advances in our ability to detect and interpret spectral signals from plants may improve both the selection of seed sources for targeted conservation and the capacity to monitor long‐term changes in vegetation.more » « less
-
Abstract Background The teleost fish Fundulus heteroclitus inhabit estuaries heavily polluted with persistent and bioaccumulative chemicals. While embryos of parents from polluted sites are remarkably resistant to toxic sediment and develop normally, embryos of parents from relatively clean estuaries, when treated with polluted sediment extracts, are developmentally delayed, displaying deformities characteristic of pollution-induced embryotoxicity. To gain insight into parental effects on sensitive and resistant phenotypes during late organogenesis, we established sensitive, resistant, and crossed embryo families using five female and five male parents from relatively clean and predominantly PAH-polluted estuaries each, measured heart rates, and quantified individual embryo expression of 179 metabolic genes. Results Pollution-induced embryotoxicity manifested as morphological deformities, significant developmental delays, and altered cardiac physiology was evident among sensitive embryos resulting from crosses between females and males from relatively clean estuaries. Significantly different heart rates among several geographically unrelated populations of sensitive, resistant, and crossed embryo families during late organogenesis and pre-hatching suggest site-specific adaptive cardiac physiology phenotypes relative to pollution exposure. Metabolic gene expression patterns (32 genes, 17.9%, at p < 0.05; 11 genes, 6.1%, at p < 0.01) among the embryo families indicate maternal pollutant deposition in the eggs and parental effects on gene expression and metabolic alterations. Conclusion Heart rate differences among sensitive, resistant, and crossed embryos is a reliable phenotype for further explorations of adaptive mechanisms. While metabolic gene expression patterns among embryo families are suggestive of parental effects on several differentially expressed genes, a definitive adaptive signature and metabolic cost of resistant phenotypes is unclear and shows unexpected sensitive-resistant crossed embryo expression profiles. Our study highlights physiological and metabolic gene expression differences during a critical embryonic stage among pollution sensitive, resistant, and crossed embryo families, which may contribute to underlying resistance mechanisms observed in natural F. heteroclitus populations living in heavily contaminated estuaries.more » « less
-
Abstract Gut microbiomes are increasingly recognized for mediating diverse biological aspects of their hosts, including complex behavioral phenotypes. Although many studies have reported that experimental disruptions to the gut microbial community result in atypical host behavior, studies that address how gut microbes contribute to adaptive behavioral trait variation are rare. Eusocial insects represent a powerful model to test this, because of their simple gut microbiota and complex division of labor characterized by colony-level variation in behavioral phenotypes. Although previous studies report correlational differences in gut microbial community associated with division of labor, here, we provide evidence that gut microbes play a causal role in defining differences in foraging behavior between European honey bees (Apis mellifera). We found that gut microbial community structure differed between hive-based nurse bees and bees that leave the hive to forage for floral resources. These differences were associated with variation in the abundance of individual microbes, including Bifidobacterium asteroides, Bombilactobacillus mellis, and Lactobacillus melliventris. Manipulations of colony demography and individual foraging experience suggested that differences in gut microbial community composition were associated with task experience. Moreover, single-microbe inoculations with B. asteroides, B. mellis, and L. melliventris caused effects on foraging intensity. These results demonstrate that gut microbes contribute to division of labor in a social insect, and support a role of gut microbes in modulating host behavioral trait variation.more » « less
-
Consistent individual differences in behavior, known as behavioral individuality, are pervasive across the animal world and have major ecological and evolutionary consequences. Nevertheless, we still have a limited understanding of what drives individuality and how it emerges during ontogeny. Here, we subjected clonal individuals to a ubiquitous yet critical environmental challenge—the threat of predation—to disentangle the developmental mechanisms of individuality. Under such a salient environmental stressor, among-individual differences may collapse or expand depending on whether there is a single or multiple optimal strategies, demonstrating that individuality itself is a developmentally plastic trait. If, however, the environment does not impact among-individual variation, this suggests that individuality is determined before birth. We continuously tracked the behavior of genetically identical fish (Amazon mollies, Poecilia formosa), reared with or without predation stress, from birth through their first month of life. Predation shifted mean-level behaviors, with predator-exposed individuals swimming more slowly and spending more time near their refuges. However, the magnitude of individuality (as evidenced by repeatability) increased similarly over development in both treatments, indicating that individuality crystallizes robustly over time, even under stress and in a vacuum of genetic variation. Predator-reared fish also exhibited greater within-individual variability in refuge use, suggesting increased behavioral flexibility or disrupted developmental canalization in response to stress. Surprisingly, maternal identity, but not maternal behavior, was the strongest predictor of swimming speed, pointing to non-behavioral maternal effects as a key pre-birth source of behavioral variation. Refuge use however was not at all predicted by maternal identity, indicating that major fitness-related behaviors can have entirely different developmental mechanisms. Collectively, we show that individuality persists despite environmental stress and is seeded before birth through non-genetic factors. Even in the face of a shared environmental challenge, the behavioral trajectories of individuals are unique.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/doi:10.1037/0000011-011
