An official website of the United States government
Introduction This dataset was gathered during the Vid2Real online video-based study, which investigates humans’ perception of robots' intelligence in the context of an incidental Human-Robot encounter. The dataset contains participants' questionnaire responses to four video study conditions, namely Baseline, Verbal, Body language, and Body language + Verbal. The videos depict a scenario where a pedestrian incidentally encounters a quadruped robot trying to enter a building. The robot uses verbal commands or body language to try to ask for help from the pedestrian in different study conditions. The differences in the conditions were manipulated using the robot’s verbal and expressive movement functionalities. Dataset Purpose The dataset includes the responses of human subjects about the robots' social intelligence used to validate the hypothesis that robot social intelligence is positively correlated with human compliance in an incidental human-robot encounter context. The video based dataset was also developed to obtain empirical evidence that can be used to design future real-world HRI studies. Dataset Contents Four videos, each corresponding to a study condition. Four sets of Perceived Social Intelligence Scale data. Each set corresponds to one study condition Four sets of compliance likelihood questions, each set include one Likert question and one free-form question One set of Godspeed questionnaire data. One set of Anthropomorphism questionnaire data. A csv file containing the participants demographic data, Likert scale data, and text responses. A data dictionary explaining the meaning of each of the fields in the csv file. Study Conditions There are 4 videos (i.e. study conditions), the video scenarios are as follows. Baseline: The robot walks up to the entrance and waits for the pedestrian to open the door without any additional behaviors. This is also the "control" condition. Verbal: The robot walks up to the entrance, and says ”can you please open the door for me” to the pedestrian while facing the same direction, then waits for the pedestrian to open the door. Body Language: The robot walks up to the entrance, turns its head to look at the pedestrian, then turns its head to face the door, and waits for the pedestrian to open the door. Body Language + Verbal: The robot walks up to the entrance, turns its head to look at the pedestrian, and says ”Can you open the door for me” to the pedestrian, then waits for the pedestrian to open the door. Image showing the Verbal condition. Image showing the Body Language condition. A within-subject design was adopted, and all participants experienced all conditions. The order of the videos, as well as the PSI scales, were randomized. After receiving consent from the participants, they were presented with one video, followed by the PSI questions and the two exploratory questions (compliance likelihood) described above. This set was repeated 4 times, after which the participants would answer their general perceptions of the robot with Godspeed and AMPH questionnaires. Each video was around 20 seconds and the total study time was around 10 minutes. Video as a Study Method A video-based study in human-robot interaction research is a common method for data collection. Videos can easily be distributed via online participant recruiting platforms, and can reach a larger sample than in-person/lab-based studies. Therefore, it is a fast and easy method for data collection for research aiming to obtain empirical evidence. Video Filming The videos were filmed with a first-person point-of-view in order to maximize the alignment of video and real-world settings. The device used for the recording was an iPhone 12 pro, and the videos were shot in 4k 60 fps. For better accessibility, the videos have been converted to lower resolutions. Instruments The questionnaires used in the study include the Perceived Social Intelligence Scale (PSI), Godspeed Questionnaire, and Anthropomorphism Questionnaire (AMPH). In addition to these questionnaires, a 5-point Likert question and a free-text response measuring human compliance were added for the purpose of the video-based study. Participant demographic data was also collected. Questionnaire items are attached as part of this dataset. Human Subjects For the purpose of this project, the participants are recruited through Prolific. Therefore, the participants are users of Prolific. Additionally, they are restricted to people who are currently living in the United States, fluent in English, and have no hearing or visual impairments. No other restrictions were imposed. Among the 385 participants, 194 participants identified as female, and 191 as male, the age ranged from 19 to 75 (M = 38.53, SD = 12.86). Human subjects remained anonymous. Participants were compensated with $4 upon submission approval. This study was reviewed and approved by UT Austin Internal Review Board. Robot The dataset contains data about humans’ perceived social intelligence of a Boston Dynamics’ quadruped robot Spot (Explorer model). The robot was selected because quadruped robots are gradually being adopted to provide services such as delivery, surveillance, and rescue. However, there are still issues or obstacles that robots cannot easily overcome by themselves in which they will have to ask for help from nearby humans. Therefore, it is important to understand how humans react to a quadruped robot that they incidentally encounter. For the purposes of this video-study, the robot operation was semi-autonomous, with the navigation being manually teleoperated by an operator and a few standalone autonomous modules to supplement it. Data Collection The data was collected through Qualtrics, a survey development platform. After the completion of data collection, the data was downloaded as a csv file. Data Quality Control Qualtrics automatically detects bots so any response that is flagged as bots are discarded. All incomplete and duplicate responses were discarded. Data Usage This dataset can be used to conduct a meta-analysis on robots' perceived intelligence. Please note that data is coupled with this study design. Users interested in data reuse will have to assess that this dataset is in line with their study design. Acknowledgement This study was funded through the NSF Award # 2219236GCR: Community-Embedded Robotics: Understanding Sociotechnical Interactions with Long-term Autonomous Deployments.
more »
« less
Perception of Social Intelligence in Robots Performing False-Belief Tasks
This study evaluated how a robot demonstrating a Theory of Mind (ToM) influenced human perception of social intelligence and animacy in a human-robot interaction. Data was gathered through an online survey where participants watched a video depicting a NAO robot either failing or passing the Sally-Anne false-belief task. Participants (N = 60) were randomly assigned to either the Pass or Fail condition. A Perceived Social Intelligence Survey and the Perceived Intelligence and Animacy subsections of the Godspeed Questionnaire were used as measures. The Godspeed was given before viewing the task to measure participant expectations, and again after to test changes in opinion. Our findings show that robots demonstrating ToM significantly increase perceived social intelligence, while robots demonstrating ToM deficiencies are perceived as less socially intelligent.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10131296
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 1 to 7
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
null (Ed.)Robotic social intelligence is increasingly important. However, measures of human social intelligence omit basic skills, and robot-specific scales do not focus on social intelligence. We combined human robot interaction concepts of beliefs, desires, and intentions with psychology concepts of behaviors, cognitions, and emotions to create 20 Perceived Social Intelligence (PSI) Scales to comprehensively measure perceptions of robots with a wide range of embodiments and behaviors. Participants rated humanoid and non-humanoid robots interacting with people in five videos. Each scale had one factor and high internal consistency, indicating each measures a coherent construct. Scales capturing perceived social information processing skills (appearing to recognize, adapt to, and predict behaviors, cognitions, and emotions) and scales capturing perceived skills for identifying people (appearing to identify humans, individuals, and groups) correlated strongly with social competence and constituted the Mind and Behavior factors. Social presentation scales (appearing friendly, caring, helpful, trustworthy, and not rude, conceited, or hostile) relate more to Social Response to Robots Scales and Godspeed Indices, form a separate factor, and predict positive feelings about robots and wanting social interaction with them. For a comprehensive measure, researchers can use all PSI 20 scales for free. Alternatively, they can select the most relevant scales for their projects.more » « less
-
Mistakes, failures, and transgressions committed by a robot are inevitable as robots become more involved in our society. When a wrong behavior occurs, it is important to understand what factors might affect how the robot is perceived by people. In this paper, we investigated how the type of transgressor (human or robot) and type of backstory depicting the transgressor's mental capabilities (default, physio-emotional, socio-emotional, or cognitive) shaped participants' perceptions of the transgressor's morality. We performed an online, between-subjects study in which participants (N=720) were first introduced to the transgressor and its backstory, and then viewed a video of a real-life robot or human pushing down a human. Although participants attributed similarly high intent to both the robot and the human, the human was generally perceived to have higher morality than the robot. However, the backstory that was told about the transgressors' capabilities affected their perceived morality. We found that robots with emotional backstories (i.e., physio-emotional or socio-emotional) had higher perceived moral knowledge, emotional knowledge, and desire than other robots. We also found that humans with cognitive backstories were perceived with less emotional and moral knowledge than other humans. Our findings have consequences for robot ethics and robot design for HRI.more » « less
-
What Happens When Robots Punish? Evaluating Human Task Performance During Robot-Initiated PunishmentThis article examines how people respond to robot-administered verbal and physical punishments. Human participants were tasked with sorting colored chips under time pressure and were punished by a robot when they made mistakes, such as inaccurate sorting or sorting too slowly. Participants were either punished verbally by being told to stop sorting for a fixed time, or physically, by restraining their ability to sort with an in-house crafted robotic exoskeleton. Either a human experimenter or the robot exoskeleton administered punishments, with participant task performance and subjective perceptions of their interaction with the robot recorded. The results indicate that participants made more mistakes on the task when under the threat of robot-administered punishment. Participants also tended to comply with robot-administered punishments at a lesser rate than human-administered punishments, which suggests that humans may not afford a robot the social authority to administer punishments. This study also contributes to our understanding of compliance with a robot and whether people accept a robot’s authority to punish. The results may influence the design of robots placed in authoritative roles and promote discussion of the ethical ramifications of robot-administered punishment.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)As Human-Robot Interaction becomes more sophisticated, measuring the performance of a social robot is crucial to gauging the effectiveness of its behavior. However, social behavior does not necessarily have strict performance metrics that other autonomous behavior can have. Indeed, when considering robot navigation, a socially-appropriate action may be one that is sub-optimal, resulting in longer paths, longer times to get to a goal. Instead, we can rely on subjective assessments of the robot's social performance by a participant in a robot interaction or by a bystander. In this paper, we use the newly-validated Perceived Social Intelligence (PSI) scale to examine the perception of non-humanoid robots in non-verbal social scenarios. We show that there are significant differences between the perceived social intelligence of robots exhibiting SAN behavior compared to one using a traditional navigation planner in scenarios such as waiting in a queue and group behavior.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN46459.2019.8956467
