skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: River channel width controls blocking by slow-moving landslides in California's Franciscan mélange
Abstract. To explore the sensitivity of rivers to blocking from landslidedebris, we exploit two similar geomorphic settings in California'sFranciscan mélange where slow-moving landslides, often referred to asearthflows, impinge on river channels with drainage areas that differ by afactor of 30. Analysis of valley widths and river long profiles over∼19 km of Alameda Creek (185 km2 drainage area) andArroyo Hondo (200 km2 drainage area) in central California shows avery consistent picture in which earthflows that intersect these channelsforce tens of meters of gravel aggradation for kilometers upstream, leadingto apparently long-lived sediment storage and channel burial at these sites.In contrast, over a ∼30 km section of the Eel River (5547 km2 drainage area), there are no knickpoints or aggradation upstreamof locations where earthflows impinge on its channel. Hydraulic andhydrologic data from United States Geological Survey (USGS) gages on Arroyo Hondo and the Eel River, combinedwith measured size distributions of boulders input by landslides for bothlocations, suggest that landslide derived boulders are not mobile at eithersite during the largest floods (>2-year recurrence) with field-measured flow depths. We therefore argue that boulder transport capacity isan unlikely explanation for the observed difference in sensitivity tolandslide inputs. At the same time, we find that earthflow fluxes per unitchannel width are nearly identical for Oak Ridge earthflow on Arroyo Hondo,where evidence for blocking is clear, and for the Boulder Creek earthflow onthe Eel River, where evidence for blocking is absent. These observationssuggest that boulder supply is also an unlikely explanation for the observedmorphological differences along the two rivers. Instead, we argue that thedramatically different sensitivity of the two locations to landslideblocking is related to differences in channel width relative to typicalseasonal displacements of earthflows. A synthesis of seasonal earthflowdisplacements in the Franciscan mélange shows that the channel width ofthe Eel River is ∼5 times larger than the largest annualseasonal displacement. In contrast, during wet winters, earthflows arecapable of crossing the entire channel width of Arroyo Hondo and AlamedaCreek. In support of this interpretation, satellite imagery shows thatimmobile earthflow-derived boulders are generally confined to the edges ofthe channel on the Eel River. By contrast, immobile earthflow-derivedboulders jam the entire channel on Arroyo Hondo. Our results imply that lower drainage area reaches of earthflow-dominated catchments may be particularly prone to blocking. By inhibiting the upstreampropagation of base-level signals, valley-blocking earthflows may thereforepromote the formation of so-called “relict topography”.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1658800
PAR ID:
10133725
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Earth Surface Dynamics
Volume:
7
Issue:
3
ISSN:
2196-632X
Page Range / eLocation ID:
879 to 894
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract. The width of valleys and channels affects the hydrology, ecology,and geomorphic functionality of drainage networks. In many studies, thewidth of valleys and/or channels (W) is estimated as a power-law function ofthe drainage area (A), W=kcAd. However, in fluvial systemsthat experience drainage reorganization, abrupt changes in drainage areadistribution can result in valley or channel widths that are disproportionalto their drainage areas. Such disproportionality may be more distinguishedin valleys than in channels due to a longer adjustment timescale forvalleys. Therefore, the valley width–area scaling in reorganized drainagesis expected to deviate from that of drainages that did not experiencereorganization. To explore the effect of reorganization on valley width–drainage areascaling, we studied 12 valley sections in the Negev desert, Israel,categorized into undisturbed, beheaded, and reversed valleys. We found thatthe values of the drainage area exponents, d, are lower in the beheadedvalleys relative to undisturbed valleys but remain positive. Reversedvalleys, in contrast, are characterized by negative d exponents, indicatingvalley narrowing with increasing drainage area. In the reversed category, wealso explored the independent effect of channel slope (S) through theequation W=kbAbSc, which yieldednegative and overall similar values for b and c. A detailed study in one reversed valley section shows that the valleynarrows downstream, whereas the channel widens, suggesting that, ashypothesized, the channel width adjusts faster to post-reorganizationdrainage area distribution. The adjusted narrow channel dictates the widthof formative flows in the reversed valley, which contrasts with the meaningfullywider formative flows of the beheaded valley across the divide. Thisdifference results in a step change in the unit stream power between thereversed and beheaded channels, potentially leading to a “width feedback”that promotes ongoing divide migration and reorganization. Our findings demonstrate that valley width–area scaling is a potential toolfor identifying landscapes influenced by drainage reorganization. Accountingfor reorganization-specific scaling can improve estimations of erosion ratedistributions in reorganized landscapes. 
    more » « less
  2. Feedbacks between surface and deep Earth processes in collisional mountain belts depend on how erosion and topographic relief vary in space and time. One outstanding unknown lies in how rock strength influences bedrock river morphology and thus mountain relief. Here, we quantify boulder cover and channel morphology using uncrewed aerial vehicle surveys along 30 kilometers of bedrock-bound river corridors throughout the Taiwan Central Range where regional gradients in rock properties relate to tectonic history. We find that boulder size systematically increases with increasing metamorphic grade and depth of exhumation. Boulder size correlates with reach-scale channel steepness but does not explain observations of highly variable channel width. Transport thresholds indicate that rivers are adjusted to mobilize boulders and are well in excess of the threshold to transport gravel and cobbles, as previously assumed. The linkage between metamorphic history, boulder size, and channel steepness reveals how rock properties can influence feedbacks between tectonics and topography throughout the life span of a mountain range. 
    more » « less
  3. In June 2022, a rain-on-snow (ROS) event occurred as the result of an atmospheric river delivering 2.5-10 cm of rain to the melting snowpack in and around Yellowstone National Park (YNP). The ROS event led to extreme flooding in northern YNP and caused extensive bank erosion, overbank deposition, and damage to infrastructure including roads and campgrounds. The degree of flooding and amount of erosion varied dramatically across northern YNP. To better understand the causes of spatial variability of flooding and erosion, we used cm-scale RTK GPS to survey flood stage indicators and channel dimensions. We typically surveyed 7 to 12 cross sections and the thalweg for each reach. A variety of stage indicators were identified including mud lines, debris lines, wash lines, and debris snags. We then used HEC-RAS to estimate peak discharge during the flood event. We estimated discharge on rivers draining the Beartooth Range (Rose Creek, Amphitheater Creek, Pebble Creek, Soda Butte Creek, Buffalo Creek, Cache Creek, and Slough Creek), the Washburn Range (Tower Creek, Lost Creek, and Blacktail Deer Creek), and the Gallatin Range (Gardner River and Gallatin River). We also determined basin area using StreamStats and calculated Riley’s Terrain Ruggedness Index from DEMs in ArcGIS. Drainage basin sizes for the surveyed reaches range from 2 km2 to 746 km2. Nearly all of the basins are categorized as moderately rugged, however, the basins draining the Beartooths are more rugged than those draining the Gallatin and Washburn Ranges. We found that, per drainage basin area, peak discharge was greatest in the Beartooth Range relative to the Gallatin and Washburn Ranges despite similar rain and snowmelt. The basins draining the Beartooth Range are characterized by extensive exposures of low porosity volcaniclastic bedrock and steep, glacially-sculpted drainages, which can generate significant overland flow, contributing to high peak discharge. In contrast, the Gallatin Range is composed of highly fractured sedimentary rocks and a thick cover of colluvium which facilitates a higher infiltration rate than the Beartooth Range, decreasing flood potential and resulting in lower peak discharge and less erosion. 
    more » « less
  4. In June 2022, a rain-on-snow (ROS) event occurred as the result of an atmospheric river delivering 2.5-10 cm of rain to the melting snowpack in and around Yellowstone National Park (YNP). The ROS event led to extreme flooding in northern YNP and caused extensive bank erosion, overbank deposition, and damage to infrastructure including roads and campgrounds. The degree of flooding and amount of erosion varied dramatically across northern YNP. To better understand the causes of spatial variability of flooding and erosion, we used cm-scale RTK GPS to survey flood stage indicators and channel dimensions. We typically surveyed 7 to 12 cross sections and the thalweg for each reach. A variety of stage indicators were identified including mud lines, debris lines, wash lines, and debris snags. We then used HEC-RAS to estimate peak discharge during the flood event. We estimated discharge on rivers draining the Beartooth Range (Rose Creek, Amphitheater Creek, Pebble Creek, Soda Butte Creek, Buffalo Creek, Cache Creek, and Slough Creek), the Washburn Range (Tower Creek, Lost Creek, and Blacktail Deer Creek), and the Gallatin Range (Gardner River and Gallatin River). We also determined basin area using StreamStats and calculated Riley’s Terrain Ruggedness Index from DEMs in ArcGIS. Drainage basin sizes for the surveyed reaches range from 2 km2 to 746 km2. Nearly all of the basins are categorized as moderately rugged, however, the basins draining the Beartooths are more rugged than those draining the Gallatin and Washburn Ranges. We found that, per drainage basin area, peak discharge was greatest in the Beartooth Range relative to the Gallatin and Washburn Ranges despite similar rain and snowmelt. The basins draining the Beartooth Range are characterized by extensive exposures of low porosity volcaniclastic bedrock and steep, glacially-sculpted drainages, which can generate significant overland flow, contributing to high peak discharge. In contrast, the Gallatin Range is composed of highly fractured sedimentary rocks and a thick cover of colluvium which facilitates a higher infiltration rate than the Beartooth Range, decreasing flood potential and resulting in lower peak discharge and less erosion. 
    more » « less
  5. In June of 2022 an extreme atmospheric river flood caused extensive bank erosion and infrastructure damage in northern Yellowstone National Park (YNP). On the lower Lamar River, peak discharge was 170% of the next highest peak of 1996 (gaged since 1923) and resulted in widespread overbank gravel deposition and channel change. In June 1918, however, flooding on the Lamar system produced similar peak flows, as shown by indirect discharge estimates and tree-ring dating. In 2022, peak discharges and flood effects varied considerably in northern YNP. The upper Lamar River had a peak discharge significantly less than 1918, likely the result of less precipitation and snowmelt in the relatively low elevations of the upper Lamar drainage in the Absaroka Range. The high flows experienced by the lower Lamar River, however, were the result of extreme discharges in tributaries that drain the Beartooth Range where Soda Butte Creek and Pebble Creek had discharges similar or greater than 1918 and discharge on Slough Creek produced extensive mid channel bar deposition greater than 2 m. In western YNP, the Gallatin River experienced little bank erosion or bed material transport, although some reaches showed minor channel scour and gravel bar deposition on glacial outwash substrates. In central YNP, the Gardiner River experienced minimal bank erosion on upper reaches, however, there was extensive bank erosion, landslides, and sediment deposition in the Gardner River Canyon where the steep, confined channel focused stream power along the valley margins. Flood magnitudes differed markedly between the Gallatin and Beartooth drainages despite similar amounts of rainfall and snowmelt. The Gallatin River drainage, dominated by highly fractured and macroporous limestone and extensive thick colluvium with gentler range flanks allows for greater infiltration and reduced peak flows. In contrast, basins in the Beartooth Range drain steeper slopes of low-permeability laharic volcaniclastic rocks, with more exposed bedrock and relief up to 900 m, which promotes rapid runoff and extreme flooding. The frequency and magnitude of rain-on-snow floods is likely increasing in YNP because of anthropogenic warming, as the high-elevation snowpack becomes more susceptible to rapid melting and late spring precipitation shifts from snow to rain. 
    more » « less