skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Synoptic Climatology of Rain-on-Snow Events in Alaska
Rain-on-snow (ROS) events can have adverse impacts on high-latitude ungulate populations when rain freezes in the snowpack, forming ice layers that block access to winter forage. In extreme cases, ROS events have led to mass die-offs. ROS events are linked to advection of warm and moist air, associated with extratropical cyclones. However, these conditions are common to many winter precipitation events, challenging our understanding of the particular conditions under which ROS events occur. This study uses the Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications version 2 (MERRA-2) to differentiate ROS events in Alaska from precipitation events in which only snow falls on a preexisting snowpack [snow-on-snow (SOS)]. Over the North Slope and Kotzebue Sound, no clear difference exists between the tracks of ROS-producing and SOS-producing storms. However, in the interior, southwest, and Anchorage, tracks of ROS-producing storms tend to be farther north and west than for SOS-producing storms. The northwest shift of ROS-producing storms is linked to the position of upper-tropospheric anticyclones in the eastern Gulf of Alaska during ROS events. ROS-producing storms are no more intense than SOS-producing storms, but their association with atmospheric blocking leads to stronger pressure gradients on the east side of storms and thereby stronger advection of positive anomalies in temperature and precipitable water. For several sites, sea level pressure in the eastern Gulf of Alaska is also significantly higher a few days prior to ROS events than prior to SOS events, further implicating atmospheric blocking as a facilitator and potential predictor of ROS events.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1928230
PAR ID:
10137677
Author(s) / Creator(s):
 ;  ;  ;  
Publisher / Repository:
American Meteorological Society
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Monthly Weather Review
Volume:
148
Issue:
3
ISSN:
0027-0644
Page Range / eLocation ID:
p. 1275-1295
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract Extreme floods and landslides in high‐latitude watersheds have been associated with rain‐on‐snow (ROS) events. Yet, the risks of changing precipitation phases on a declining snowpack under a warming climate remain unclear. Normalizing the total annual duration of ROS with that of the seasonal snowpack, the ERA5 data (1941–2023) show that the frequency of high‐runoff ROS events is a characteristic feature of high‐latitude coastal zones, particularly over the coasts of south‐central Alaska and southern Newfoundland. Total rainfall accumulation per seasonal snowpack duration has increased across western mountain ranges, with the Olympic Mountains experiencing more than 40 mm of additional rainfall over the snowpack in the past eight decades, followed by the Sierra Nevada. These trends could drive an 8% increase in rainfall extremes (e.g., more than 10 mm for 6 hr storm with a 15‐year return period), highlighting the need for resilient flood control systems in high‐latitude coastal cities. 
    more » « less
  2. Abstract Predicting winter flooding is critical to protecting people and securing water resources in California’s Sierra Nevada. Rain-on-snow (ROS) events are a common cause of widespread flooding and are expected to increase in both frequency and magnitude with anthropogenic climate change in this region. ROS flood severity depends on terrestrial water input (TWI), the sum of rain and snowmelt that reaches the land surface. However, an incomplete understanding of the processes that control the flow and refreezing of liquid water in the snowpack limits flood prediction by operational and research models. We examine how antecedent snowpack conditions alter TWI during 71 ROS events between water years 1981 and 2019. Observations across a 500-m elevation gradient from the Independence Creek catchment were input into SNOWPACK, a one-dimensional, physically based snow model, initiated with the Richards equation and calibrated with collocated snow pillow observations. We compare observed “historical” and “scenario” ROS events, where we hold meteorologic conditions constant but vary snowpack conditions. Snowpack variables include cold content, snow density, liquid water content, and snow water equivalent. Results indicate that historical events with TWI > rain are associated with the largest observed streamflows. A multiple linear regression analysis of scenario events suggests that TWI is sensitive to interactions between snow density and cold content, with denser (>0.30 g cm−3) and colder (<−0.3 MJ of cold content) snowpacks retaining >50 mm of TWI. These results highlight the importance of hydraulic limitations in dense snowpacks and energy limitations in warm snowpacks for retaining liquid water that would otherwise be available as TWI for flooding. Significance StatementThe purpose of this study is to understand how the snowpack modulates quantities of water that reach the land surface during rain-on-snow (ROS) events. While the amount of near-term storm rainfall is reasonably predicted by meteorologists, major floods associated with ROS are more difficult to predict and are expected to increase in frequency. Our key findings are that liquid water inputs to the land surface vary with snowpack characteristics, and although many hydrologic models incorporate snowpack cold content and density to some degree, the complexity of ROS events justifies the need for additional observations to improve operational forecasting model results. Our findings suggest additional comparisons between existing forecasting models and those that physically represent the snowpack, as well as field-based observations of cold content and density and liquid water content, would be useful follow-up investigations. 
    more » « less
  3. Arctic warming may lead to altered occurrences and strengthening of extreme weather events. Arctic rain-on-snow (ROS) events are of a particular interest in this regard. ROS conditions generate hazards for the transportation sector, ranging from flooding and icing to airport closures, and can severely damage infrastructure through wet-snow avalanches. ROS events, and the resulting ice growth, interfere with foraging by reindeer, caribou, and musk oxen, heavily relied upon species among Indigenous peoples. There have been documented mass starvations of these animals due to ROS. This study addresses the meteorological setups of Arctic ROS events. We focus on cases for Iqaluit, Nunavut, in Canada and Nuuk, Greenland, using ERA5 atmospheric reanalysis, surface weather station data, and atmospheric soundings. At the synoptic scale, we find that blocking patterns play leading roles in ROS initiation, with atmospheric rivers contributing to both direct and indirect effects. Cyclone-induced low-level jets and resultant “warm noses” of higher air temperatures and elevated moisture transport are other key features in ROS generation. We conclude by postulating how climate change may alter the severity and frequency of Arctic ROS events, drawing on this improved knowledge of weather patterns leading to ROS conditions. 
    more » « less
  4. Abstract. Climate change affects precipitation phase, which can propagate into changes in streamflow timing and magnitude. This study examines how the spatial and temporal distribution of rainfall and snowmelt affects discharge in rain–snow transition zones. These zones experience large year-to-year variations in precipitation phase, cover a significant area of mountain catchments globally, and might extend to higher elevations under future climate change. We used observations from 11 weather stations and snow depths measured from one aerial lidar survey to force a spatially distributed snowpack model (iSnobal/Automated Water Supply Model) in a semiarid, 1.8 km2 headwater catchment. We focused on surface water input (SWI; the summation of rainfall and snowmelt on the soil) for 4 years with contrasting climatological conditions (wet, dry, rainy, and snowy) and compared simulated SWI to measured discharge. A strong spatial agreement between snow depth from the lidar survey and model (r2 = 0.88) was observed, with a median Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) of 0.65 for simulated and measured snow depths at snow depth stations for all modeled years (0.75 for normalized snow depths). The spatial pattern of SWI was consistent between the 4 years, with north-facing slopes producing 1.09–1.25 times more SWI than south-facing slopes, and snowdrifts producing up to 6 times more SWI than the catchment average. Annual discharge in the catchment was not significantly correlated with the fraction of precipitation falling as snow; instead, it was correlated with the magnitude of precipitation and spring snow and rain. Stream cessation depended on total and spring precipitation, as well as on the melt-out date of the snowdrifts. These results highlight the importance of the heterogeneity of SWI at the rain–snow transition zone for streamflow generation and cessation, and emphasize the need for spatially distributed modeling or monitoring of both snowpack and rainfall dynamics. 
    more » « less
  5. Abstract A two decade‐long megadrought, with likely anthropogenic causes, has impacted forest growth and mortality across the southwestern U.S. Given this event, and the future likelihood of similar climate challenges, it is important to understand how different water resources are used by semi‐arid forests in this region. Within the geographic domain of the North American Monsoon climate system, we studied seasonal water‐use in eight differentPinus ponderosamontane forests distributed across a climate gradient with varying contributions from winter and summer precipitation. We collected oxygen isotopes from precipitation, soil, and xylem water during two contrasting hydrologic years to determine how trees differentially use winter versus summer precipitation sources. Most trees switched from using snowmelt water as the primary source during the early‐summer hyper‐arid period, to monsoon rainwater during the late‐summer. However, during the low snowpack year, which represents the most common climate phenomenon during the megadrought, trees at all sites used less summer rain when compared to the higher snowpack year, demonstrating a drought‐induced antecedent influence of winter precipitation on the uptake of summer rain. A possible mechanism to explain the antecedent effect is an earlier snow disappearance during the low snowpack year weakening hydrologic connectivity within the soil profile, decreasing the soil infiltration of summer rains. However, in years with higher snowpack, the snow lasts longer, and this can improve the hydrologic connectivity within the soil profile. As a result, there is more infiltration of summer rains into the soils. This can enhance the maintenance of active shallow fine‐root biomass during the period when snowpack disappears, and monsoon rains have yet to arrive. These findings provide insight into how the seasonal interactions between major seasonal climate systems influence forest tree water use in the face of an extreme megadrought. 
    more » « less