RAS GTPases are proto‐oncoproteins that regulate cell growth, proliferation, and differentiation in response to extracellular signals. The signaling functions of RAS, and other small GTPases, are dependent on their ability to cycle between GDP‐bound and GTP‐bound states. Structural analyses suggest that GTP hydrolysis catalyzed by HRAS can be regulated by an allosteric site located between helices 3, 4, and loop 7. Here we explore the relationship between intrinsic GTP hydrolysis on HRAS and the position of helix 3 and loop 7 through manipulation of the allosteric site, showing that the two sites are functionally connected. We generated several hydrophobic mutations in the allosteric site of HRAS to promote shifts in helix 3 relative to helix 4. By combining crystallography and enzymology to study these mutants, we show that closure of the allosteric site correlates with increased hydrolysis of GTP on HRAS in solution. Interestingly, binding to the RAS binding domain of RAF kinase (RAF‐RBD) inhibits GTP hydrolysis in the mutants. This behavior may be representative of a cluster of mutations found in human tumors, which potentially cooperate with RAF complex formation to stabilize the GTP‐bound state of RAS.
Formation and Measurement of Ras Y32 Mutant's Role in GTP Hydrolysis
Introduction: Members of the Ras protein family are involved in sending signals through the human body to regulate processes including cell growth. Acting as a molecular switch, Ras alternates between its active and inactive states (“on” and “off”) depending on its binding to either GTP or GDP. Upon the introduction of a mutation, Ras becomes incapable of performing the GTP hydrolysis reaction at a controlled rate. This results in the protein remaining in the “on” state for prolonged periods of time, disturbing its role in the regulation of cell growth and causing tumors to form. In the genome of cancerous tumors, mutations that permanently activate Ras have been observed and analyzed at three distinct locations, one being Q61. Previous research1 shows how the Q61 residue contributes to the protein’s function by stabilizing the water molecule in the active site, but little research has been done studying the Y32 residue, which has also been implicated in the mechanism. This research investigates the role Y32 plays in activating Ras via introduction of a different amino acid and measurement of the mutated protein’s activity in the hydrolysis of GTP.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1757885
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10138561
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- 2019 BMES Conference Proceedings - REU Abstract Accepted Poster
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
more » « less
Abstract -
null (Ed.)Living organisms need energy to stay alive; in cells, this energy is supplied in the form of a small molecule called adenosine triphosphate, or ATP, a nucleotide that stores energy in the bonds between its three phosphate groups. ATP is present in all living cells and is often referred to as the energy currency of the cell, because it can be easily stored and transported to where it is needed. However, it is unknown why cells rely so heavily on ATP when a highly similar nucleotide called guanosine triphosphate, or GTP, could also act as an energy currency. There are several examples of proteins that originally used GTP and have since evolved to use ATP, but it is not clear why this switch occurred. One suggestion is that ATP is the more readily available nucleotide in the cell. To test this hypothesis, Updegrove, Harke et al. studied a protein that helps bacteria transition into spores, which are hardier and can survive in extreme environments until conditions become favorable for bacteria to grow again. In modern bacteria, this protein uses ATP to provide energy, but it evolved from an ancestral protein that used GTP instead. First, Updegrove, Harke et al. engineered the protein so that it became more similar to the ancestral protein and used GTP instead of ATP. When this was done, the protein gained the ability to break down GTP and release energy from it, but it no longer performed its enzymatic function. This suggests that both the energy released and the source of that energy are important for a protein’s activity. Further analysis showed that the modern version of the protein has evolved to briefly hold on to ATP after releasing its energy, which did not happen with GTP in the modified protein. Updegrove, Harke et al. also discovered that the levels of GTP in a bacterial cell fall as it transforms into a spore, while ATP levels remain relatively high. This suggests that ATP may indeed have become the source of energy of choice because it was more available. These findings provide insights into how ATP became the energy currency in cells, and suggest that how ATP is bound by proteins can impact a protein’s activity. Additionally, these experiments could help inform the development of drugs targeting proteins that bind nucleotides: it may be essential to consider the entirety of the binding event, and not just the release of energy.more » « less
-
The Cdc42 guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase) plays a central role in polarity development in species ranging from yeast to humans. In budding yeast, a specific growth site is selected in the G1 phase. Rsr1, a Ras GTPase, interacts with Cdc42 and its associated proteins to promote polarized growth at the proper bud site. Yet how Rsr1 regulates cell polarization is not fully understood. Here, we show that Rsr1-GDP interacts with the scaffold protein Bem1 in early G1, likely hindering the role of Bem1 in Cdc42 polarization and polarized secretion. Consistent with these in vivo observations, mathematical modeling predicts that Bem1 is unable to promote Cdc42 polarization in early G1 in the presence of Rsr1-GDP. We find that a part of the Bem1 Phox homology domain, which overlaps with a region interacting with the exocyst component Exo70, is necessary for the association of Bem1 with Rsr1-GDP. Overexpression of the GDP-locked Rsr1 interferes with Bem1-dependent Exo70 polarization. We thus propose that Rsr1 functions in spatial and temporal regulation of polarity establishment by associating with distinct polarity factors in its GTP- and GDP-bound states.more » « less
-
Activation of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor (EGFR) at the cell surface initiates signaling through the RAS-RAF-MAPK/ERK1/2 pathway and receptor endocytosis. Whether this signaling continues from endosomes remains unclear, because RAS is predominantly located on the plasma membrane, and the localization of endogenous RAF kinases, downstream effectors of RAS, is not defined. To examine RAF localization, we labeled endogenous RAF1 with mVenus using gene editing. From 10 to 15% of RAF1-mVenus (<2000 molecules/cell), which was initially entirely cytosolic, transiently translocated to the plasma membrane after EGF stimulation. Following an early burst of translocation, the membrane-associated RAF1-mVenus was undetectable by microscopy or subcellular fractionation, and this pool was estimated to be <200 molecules per cell. In contrast, persistent EGF-dependent translocation of RAF1-mVenus to the plasma membrane was driven by the RAF inhibitor sorafenib, which increases the affinity of Ras-GTP:RAF1 interactions. RAF1-mVenus was not found in EGFR-containing endosomes under any conditions. Computational modeling of RAF1 dynamics revealed that RAF1 membrane abundance is controlled most prominently by association and dissociation rates from RAS-GTP and by RAS-GTP concentration. The model further suggested that the relatively protracted activation of the RAF-MEK1/2-ERK1/2 module, in comparison with RAF1 membrane localization, may involve multiple rounds of cytosolic RAF1 rebinding to active RAS at the membrane.more » « less
-
Proteins are the workhorses of the cell. The shape that a protein molecule adopts enables it to carry out its role. However, a protein’s shape, or 'conformation', is not static. Instead, a protein can shift between different conformations. This is particularly true for enzymes – the proteins that catalyze chemical reactions. The region of an enzyme where the chemical reaction happens, known as the active site, often has to change its conformation to allow catalysis to proceed. Changes in temperature can also make a protein shift between alternative conformations. Understanding how a protein shifts between conformations gives insight into how it works. A common method for studying protein conformation is X-ray crystallography. This technique uses a beam of X-rays to figure out where the atoms of the protein are inside a crystal made of millions of copies of that protein. At room temperature or biological temperature, X-rays can rapidly damage the protein. Because of this, most crystal structures are determined at very low temperatures to minimize damage. But cooling to low temperatures changes the conformations that the protein adopts, and usually causes fewer conformations to be present. Keedy, Kenner, Warkentin, Woldeyes et al. have used X-ray crystallography from a very low temperature (-173°C or 100 K) to above room temperature (up to 27°C or 300 K) to explore the alternative conformations of an enzyme called cyclophilin A. These alternative conformations include those that have previously been linked to this enzyme’s activity. Starting at a low temperature, parts of the enzyme were seen to shift from having a single conformation to many conformations above a threshold temperature. Unexpectedly, different parts of the enzyme have different threshold temperatures, suggesting that there isn’t a single transition across the whole protein. Instead, it appears the way a protein’s conformation changes in response to temperature is more complex than was previously realized. This result suggests that conformations in different parts of a protein are coupled to each other in complex ways. Keedy, Kenner, Warkentin, Woldeyes et al. then performed X-ray crystallography at room temperature using an X-ray free-electron laser (XFEL). This technique can capture the protein’s structure before radiation damage occurs, and confirmed that the alternative conformations observed were not affected by radiation damage. The combination of X-ray crystallography at multiple temperatures, new analysis methods for identifying and measuring alternative conformations, and XFEL crystallography should help future studies to characterize conformational changes in other proteins.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- The DOI is not currently available.
