More Like this

1. An OpenCL-Based Acceleration for Canny Algorithm Using a Heterogeneous CPU-FPGA Platform

   https://doi.org/10.1109/FCCM.2019.00063  

   Rahamneh, Samah ; Sawalha, Lina ( April 2019 , IEEE 27th Annual International Symposium on Field-Programmable Custom Computing Machines (FCCM))

   Field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) provide both performance and power benefits to heterogeneous systems. In this work, we used a closely-coupled CPU-FPGA heterogeneous system to accelerate the Canny edge detector algorithm and compared the performance of the hybrid implementation with that of the optimized separate CPU and FPGA implementations. Our results show up to 4.8X speedup for the hybrid implementation over the CPU only implementation and up to 2.1X over the FPGA only implementation.
2. FPGA-Based Acceleration of Time Series Similarity Prediction: From Cloud to Edge

   https://doi.org/10.1145/3555810  

   Kalantar, Amin ; Zimmerman, Zachary ; Brisk, Philip ( July 2022 , ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems)

   With the proliferation of low-cost sensors and the Internet of Things, the rate of producing data far exceeds the compute and storage capabilities of today’s infrastructure. Much of this data takes the form of time series, and in response, there has been increasing interest in the creation of time series archives in the last decade, along with the development and deployment of novel analysis methods to process the data. The general strategy has been to apply a plurality of similarity search mechanisms to various subsets and subsequences of time series data in order to identify repeated patterns and anomalies; however, the computational demands of these approaches renders them incompatible with today’s power-constrained embedded CPUs. To address this challenge, we present FA-LAMP, an FPGA-accelerated implementation of the Learned Approximate Matrix Profile (LAMP) algorithm, which predicts the correlation between streaming data sampled in real-time and a representative time series dataset used for training. FA-LAMP lends itself as a real-time solution for time series analysis problems such as classification. We present the implementation of FA-LAMP on both edge- and cloud-based prototypes. On the edge devices, FA-LAMP integrates accelerated computation as close as possible to IoT sensors, thereby eliminating the need to transmit andmore »store data in the cloud for posterior analysis. On the cloud-based accelerators, FA-LAMP can execute multiple LAMP models on the same board, allowing simultaneous processing of incoming data from multiple data sources across a network. LAMP employs a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) for prediction. This work investigates the challenges and limitations of deploying CNNs on FPGAs using the Xilinx Deep Learning Processor Unit (DPU) and the Vitis AI development environment. We expose several technical limitations of the DPU, while providing a mechanism to overcome them by attaching custom IP block accelerators to the architecture. We evaluate FA-LAMP using a low-cost Xilinx Ultra96-V2 FPGA as well as a cloud-based Xilinx Alveo U280 accelerator card and measure their performance against a prototypical LAMP deployment running on a Raspberry Pi 3, an Edge TPU, a GPU, a desktop CPU, and a server-class CPU. In the edge scenario, the Ultra96-V2 FPGA improved performance and energy consumption compared to the Raspberry Pi; in the cloud scenario, the server CPU and GPU outperformed the Alveo U280 accelerator card, while the desktop CPU achieved comparable performance; however, the Alveo card offered an order of magnitude lower energy consumption compared to the other four platforms. Our implementation is publicly available at https://github.com/aminiok1/lamp-alveo.« less
3. On-FPGA training with ultra memory reduction: A low-precision tensor method

   Zhang, Kaiqi ; Hawkins, Cole ; Zhang, Xiyuan ; Hao, Cong ; Zhang, Zheng ( May 2021 , ICLR Workshop on Hardware Aware Efficient Training)

   Various hardware accelerators have been developed for energy-efficient and real-time inference of neural networks on edge devices. However, most training is done on high-performance GPUs or servers, and the huge memory and computing costs prevent training neural networks on edge devices. This paper proposes a novel tensor-based training framework, which offers orders-of-magnitude memory reduction in the training process. We propose a novel rank-adaptive tensorized neural network model, and design a hardware-friendly low-precision algorithm to train this model. We present an FPGA accelerator to demonstrate the benefits of this training method on edge devices. Our preliminary FPGA implementation achieves 59× speedup and 123× energy reduction compared to embedded CPU, and 292× memory reduction over a standard full-size training.
4. Parallel Sampling-Pipeline for Indefinite Stream of Heterogeneous Graphs using OpenCL for FPGAs

   https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData.2018.8621979  

   Tariq, Muhammad Usman ; Saeed, Fahad ( December 2018 , IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data))

   In the field of data science, a huge amount of data, generally represented as graphs, needs to be processed and analyzed. It is of utmost importance that this data be processed swiftly and efficiently to save time and energy. The volume and velocity of data, along with irregular access patterns in graph data structures, pose challenges in terms of analysis and processing. Further, a big chunk of time and energy is spent on analyzing these graphs on large compute clusters and/or data-centers. Filtering and refining of data using graph sampling techniques are one of the most effective ways to speed up the analysis. Efficient accelerators, such as FPGAs, have proven to significantly lower the energy cost of running an algorithm. To this end, we present the design and implementation of a parallel graph sampling technique, for a large number of input graphs streaming into a FPGA. A parallel approach using OpenCL for FPGAs was adopted to come up with a solution that is both time- and energy-efficient. We introduce a novel graph data structure, suitable for streaming graphs on FPGAs, that allows time- and memory-efficient representation of graphs. Our experiments show that our proposed technique is 3x faster and 2xmore »more energy efficient as compared to serial CPU version of the algorithm.« less
5. Issues in the Reproducibility of Deep Learning Results

   https://doi.org/10.1109/SPMB47826.2019.9037840  

   Jean-Paul, S. ; Elseify, T. ; Obeid, I. ; Picone, J. ( December 2019 , IEEE Signal Processing in Medicine and Biology Symposium (SPMB))

   Obeid, I. ; Selesnik, I. ; Picone, J. (Ed.)

   The Neuronix high-performance computing cluster allows us to conduct extensive machine learning experiments on big data [1]. This heterogeneous cluster uses innovative scheduling technology, Slurm [2], that manages a network of CPUs and graphics processing units (GPUs). The GPU farm consists of a variety of processors ranging from low-end consumer grade devices such as the Nvidia GTX 970 to higher-end devices such as the GeForce RTX 2080. These GPUs are essential to our research since they allow extremely compute-intensive deep learning tasks to be executed on massive data resources such as the TUH EEG Corpus [2]. We use TensorFlow [3] as the core machine learning library for our deep learning systems, and routinely employ multiple GPUs to accelerate the training process. Reproducible results are essential to machine learning research. Reproducibility in this context means the ability to replicate an existing experiment – performance metrics such as error rates should be identical and floating-point calculations should match closely. Three examples of ways we typically expect an experiment to be replicable are: (1) The same job run on the same processor should produce the same results each time it is run. (2) A job run on a CPU and GPU should producemore »identical results. (3) A job should produce comparable results if the data is presented in a different order. System optimization requires an ability to directly compare error rates for algorithms evaluated under comparable operating conditions. However, it is a difficult task to exactly reproduce the results for large, complex deep learning systems that often require more than a trillion calculations per experiment [5]. This is a fairly well-known issue and one we will explore in this poster. Researchers must be able to replicate results on a specific data set to establish the integrity of an implementation. They can then use that implementation as a baseline for comparison purposes. A lack of reproducibility makes it very difficult to debug algorithms and validate changes to the system. Equally important, since many results in deep learning research are dependent on the order in which the system is exposed to the data, the specific processors used, and even the order in which those processors are accessed, it becomes a challenging problem to compare two algorithms since each system must be individually optimized for a specific data set or processor. This is extremely time-consuming for algorithm research in which a single run often taxes a computing environment to its limits. Well-known techniques such as cross-validation [5,6] can be used to mitigate these effects, but this is also computationally expensive. These issues are further compounded by the fact that most deep learning algorithms are susceptible to the way computational noise propagates through the system. GPUs are particularly notorious for this because, in a clustered environment, it becomes more difficult to control which processors are used at various points in time. Another equally frustrating issue is that upgrades to the deep learning package, such as the transition from TensorFlow v1.9 to v1.13, can also result in large fluctuations in error rates when re-running the same experiment. Since TensorFlow is constantly updating functions to support GPU use, maintaining an historical archive of experimental results that can be used to calibrate algorithm research is quite a challenge. This makes it very difficult to optimize the system or select the best configurations. The overall impact of all of these issues described above is significant as error rates can fluctuate by as much as 25% due to these types of computational issues. Cross-validation is one technique used to mitigate this, but that is expensive since you need to do multiple runs over the data, which further taxes a computing infrastructure already running at max capacity. GPUs are preferred when training a large network since these systems train at least two orders of magnitude faster than CPUs [7]. Large-scale experiments are simply not feasible without using GPUs. However, there is a tradeoff to gain this performance. Since all our GPUs use the NVIDIA CUDA® Deep Neural Network library (cuDNN) [8], a GPU-accelerated library of primitives for deep neural networks, it adds an element of randomness into the experiment. When a GPU is used to train a network in TensorFlow, it automatically searches for a cuDNN implementation. NVIDIA’s cuDNN implementation provides algorithms that increase the performance and help the model train quicker, but they are non-deterministic algorithms [9,10]. Since our networks have many complex layers, there is no easy way to avoid this randomness. Instead of comparing each epoch, we compare the average performance of the experiment because it gives us a hint of how our model is performing per experiment, and if the changes we make are efficient. In this poster, we will discuss a variety of issues related to reproducibility and introduce ways we mitigate these effects. For example, TensorFlow uses a random number generator (RNG) which is not seeded by default. TensorFlow determines the initialization point and how certain functions execute using the RNG. The solution for this is seeding all the necessary components before training the model. This forces TensorFlow to use the same initialization point and sets how certain layers work (e.g., dropout layers). However, seeding all the RNGs will not guarantee a controlled experiment. Other variables can affect the outcome of the experiment such as training using GPUs, allowing multi-threading on CPUs, using certain layers, etc. To mitigate our problems with reproducibility, we first make sure that the data is processed in the same order during training. Therefore, we save the data from the last experiment and to make sure the newer experiment follows the same order. If we allow the data to be shuffled, it can affect the performance due to how the model was exposed to the data. We also specify the float data type to be 32-bit since Python defaults to 64-bit. We try to avoid using 64-bit precision because the numbers produced by a GPU can vary significantly depending on the GPU architecture [11-13]. Controlling precision somewhat reduces differences due to computational noise even though technically it increases the amount of computational noise. We are currently developing more advanced techniques for preserving the efficiency of our training process while also maintaining the ability to reproduce models. In our poster presentation we will demonstrate these issues using some novel visualization tools, present several examples of the extent to which these issues influence research results on electroencephalography (EEG) and digital pathology experiments and introduce new ways to manage such computational issues.« less