An official website of the United States government
cognition model (i.e., bottom-up or top-down) applied during program comprehension tasks. The cognition models examine how programmers understand source code by describing the temporary information structures in the programmer’s short term memory. The two types of models that we are interested in are top-down and bottom-up. The top-down model is normally applied as-needed (i.e., the domain of the system is familiar). The bottom-up model is typically applied when a developer is not familiar with the domain or the source code. An eye-tracking study of 18 developers reading and summarizing Java methods is used as our dataset for analyzing the mental cognition model. The developers provide a written summary for methods assigned to them. In total, 63 methods are used from five different systems. The results indicate that on average, experts and novices read the methods more closely (using the bottom-up mental model) than bouncing around (using top-down). However, on average novices spend longer gaze time performing bottom-up (66s.) compared to experts (43s.)
more »
« less
Developer Reading Behavior while Summarizing Java Methods : Size and Context Matters
An eye-tracking study of 18 developers reading and summarizing Java methods is presented. The developers provide a written summary for methods assigned to them. In total, 63 methods are used from five different systems. Previous studies on this topic use only short methods presented in isolation usually as images. In contrast, this work presents the study in the Eclipse IDE allowing access to all the source code in the system. The developer can navigate via scrolling and switching files while writing the summary. New eye-tracking infrastructure allows for this improvement in the study environment. Data collected includes eye gazes on source code, written summaries, and time to complete each summary. Unlike prior work that concluded developers focus on the signature the most, these results indicate that they tend to focus on the method body more than the signature. Moreover, both experts and novices tend to revisit control flow terms rather than reading them for a long period. They also spend a significant amount of gaze time and have higher gaze visits when they read call terms. Experts tend to revisit the body of the method significantly more frequently than its signature as the size of the method increases. Moreover, experts tend to write their summaries from source code lines that they read the most.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1730181
- PAR ID:
- 10148763
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 12 pages
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Code summarization is the task of creating short, natural language descriptions of source code. It is an important part of code comprehension and a powerful method of documentation. Previous work has made progress in identifying where programmers focus in code as they write their own summaries (i.e., Writing). However, there is currently a gap in studying programmers’ attention as they read code with pre-written summaries (i.e., Reading). As a result, it is currently unknown how these two forms of code comprehension compare: Reading and Writing. Also, there is a limited understanding of programmer attention with respect to program semantics. We address these shortcomings with a human eye-tracking study (n= 27) comparing Reading and Writing. We examined programmers’ attention with respect to fine-grained program semantics, including their attention sequences (i.e., scan paths). We find distinctions in programmer attention across the comprehension tasks, similarities in reading patterns between them, and differences mediated by demographic factors. This can help guide code comprehension in both computer science education and automated code summarization. Furthermore, we mapped programmers’ gaze data onto the Abstract Syntax Tree to explore another representation of human attention. We find that visual behavior on this structure is not always consistent with that on source code.more » « less
-
Busjahn et al. [4] on the factors influencing dwell time during source code reading, where source code element type and frequency of gaze visits are studied as factors. Unlike the previous study, this study focuses on analyzing eye movement data in large open source Java projects. Five experts and thirteen novices participated in the study where the main task is to summarize methods. The results examine semantic line-level information that developers view during summarization. We find no correlation between the line length and the total duration of time spent looking on the line even though it exists between a token’s length and the total fixation time on the token reported in prior work. The first fixations inside a method are more likely to be on a method’s signature, a variable declaration, or an assignment compared to the other fixations inside a method. In addition, it is found that smaller methods tend to have shorter overall fixation duration for the entire method, but have significantly longer duration per line in the method. The analysis provides insights into how source code’s unique characteristics can help in building more robust methods for analyzing eye movements in source code and overall in building theories to support program comprehension on realistic tasks.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Stack Overflow is commonly used by software developers to help solve problems they face while working on software tasks such as fixing bugs or building new features. Recent research has explored how the content of Stack Overflow posts affects attraction and how the reputation of users attracts more visitors. However, there is very little evidence on the effect that visual attractors and content quantity have on directing gaze toward parts of a post, and which parts hold the attention of a user longer. Moreover, little is known about how these attractors help developers (students and professionals) answer comprehension questions. This paper presents an eye tracking study on thirty developers constrained to reading only Stack Overflow posts while summarizing four open source methods or classes. Results indicate that on average paragraphs and code snippets were fixated upon most often and longest. When ranking pages by number of appearance of code blocks and paragraphs, we found that while the presence of more code blocks did not affect number of fixations, the presence of increasing numbers of plain text paragraphs significantly drove down the fixations on comments. SO posts that were looked at only by students had longer fixation times on code elements within the first ten fixations. We found that 16 developer summaries contained 5 or more meaningful terms from SO posts they viewed. We discuss how our observations of reading behavior could benefit how users structure their posts.more » « less
-
Ribeiro, Haroldo V. (Ed.)Reading is a complex cognitive process that involves primary oculomotor function and high-level activities like attention focus and language processing. When we read, our eyes move by primary physiological functions while responding to language-processing demands. In fact, the eyes perform discontinuous twofold movements, namely, successive long jumps (saccades) interposed by small steps (fixations) in which the gaze “scans” confined locations. It is only through the fixations that information is effectively captured for brain processing. Since individuals can express similar as well as entirely different opinions about a given text, it is therefore expected that the form, content and style of a text could induce different eye-movement patterns among people. A question that naturally arises is whether these individuals’ behaviours are correlated, so that eye-tracking while reading can be used as a proxy for text subjective properties. Here we perform a set of eye-tracking experiments with a group of individuals reading different types of texts, including children stories, random word generated texts and excerpts from literature work. In parallel, an extensive Internet survey was conducted for categorizing these texts in terms of their complexity and coherence, considering a large number of individuals selected according to different ages, gender and levels of education. The computational analysis of the fixation maps obtained from the gaze trajectories of the subjects for a given text reveals that the average “magnetization” of the fixation configurations correlates strongly with their complexity observed in the survey. Moreover, we perform a thermodynamic analysis using the Maximum-Entropy Model and find that coherent texts were closer to their corresponding “critical points” than non-coherent ones, as computed from the Pairwise Maximum-Entropy method, suggesting that different texts may induce distinct cohesive reading activities.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- The DOI is not currently available.
