More Like this

1. Di(indenyl)beryllium

   https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202107980  

   Koby, Ross_F; Schley, Nathan_D; Hanusa, Timothy_P (August 2021, Angewandte Chemie International Edition)

   Abstract The bonding in beryllocene, [BeCp₂], took decades to establish, owing to its unexpected mixed hapticity structure (i.e., [Be(η⁵‐Cp)(η¹‐Cp)]). Beryllium complexes containing the indenyl ligand, which is a close relative of the cyclopentadienyl anion, but which is also known to exhibit its own bonding peculiarities (e.g., facile η⁵⇄ η³shifts), have remained unknown. Standard metathetical approaches to their synthesis (e.g., with K[Ind′] + BeX₂in an ether solvent) give rise to intractable oils from which nothing identifiable can be isolated. In contrast, mechanochemical preparation, involving the solvent‐free grinding of BeBr₂and potassium indenides, leads to the production of discrete (indenyl)beryllium complexes, including [Be(C₉H₇)₂] (1) and [Be{1,3‐(SiMe₃)₂C₉H₅}Br] (2). The former displays η⁵/η¹‐coordinated ligands in the solid state, but DFT calculations indicate that an η⁵/η⁵‐conformation is less than 5 kcal mol⁻¹higher in energy. 

   more » « less
2. Cationic Bis(Gold) Indenyl Complexes

   https://doi.org/10.1002/cplu.202300691  

   Slinger, Brady_L; Zhu, Jiaqi; Widenhoefer, Ross_A (February 2024, ChemPlusChem)

   Abstract Reaction of (P)AuOTf [P=P(t‐Bu)₂o‐biphenyl] with indenyl‐ or 3‐methylindenyl lithium led to isolation of gold η¹‐indenyl complexes (P)Au(η¹‐inden‐1‐yl) (1 a) and (P)Au(η¹‐3‐methylinden‐1‐yl) (1 b), respectively, in >65 % yield. Whereas complex1 bis static, complex1 aundergoes facile, degenerate 1,3‐migration of gold about the indenyl ligand (ΔG^≠_153K=9.1±1.1 kcal/mol). Treatment of complexes1 aand1 bwith (P)AuNTf₂led to formation of the corresponding cationic bis(gold) indenyl complexestrans‐[(P)Au]₂(η¹,η¹‐inden‐1,3‐yl) (2 a) andtrans‐[(P)Au]₂(η¹,η²‐3‐methylinden‐1‐yl) (2 b), respectively, which were characterized spectroscopically and modeled computationally. Despite the absence of aurophilic stabilization in complexes2 aand2 b, the binding affinity of mono(gold) complex1 atoward exogenous (P)Au⁺exceed that of free indene by ~350‐fold and similarly the binding affinity of1 btoward exogenous (P)Au⁺exceed that of 3‐methylindene by ~50‐fold. The energy barrier for protodeauration of bis(gold) indenyl complex2 awith HOAc was ≥8 kcal/mol higher than for protodeauration of mono(gold) complex1 a. 

   more » « less
3. Designing a Planar Chiral Rhodium Indenyl Catalyst for Regio- and Enantioselective Allylic C–H Amidation

   https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c07305  

   Farr, Caitlin M.; Kazerouni, Amaan M.; Park, Bohyun; Poff, Christopher D.; Won, Joonghee; Sharp, Kimberly R.; Baik, Mu-Hyun; Blakey, Simon B. (July 2020, Journal of the American Chemical Society)
4. Synthesis and reactivity of chiral rhenium indenyl complexes of the formula [(.eta.5-C9H7)Re(NO)(PPh3)(X)]n+

   https://doi.org/10.1021/om00034a026  

   Zhou, Yuanlin; Dewey, Michael A.; Gladysz, J. A. (October 1993, Organometallics)
5. Parametric dependence of hot electron relaxation timescales on electron-electron and electron-phonon interaction strengths

   https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-020-00442-x  

   Wilson, Richard B.; Coh, Sinisa (December 2020, Communications Physics)

   null (Ed.)

   Abstract Understanding how photoexcited electron dynamics depend on electron-electron (e-e) and electron-phonon (e-p) interaction strengths is important for many fields, e.g. ultrafast magnetism, photocatalysis, plasmonics, and others. Here, we report simple expressions that capture the interplay of e-e and e-p interactions on electron distribution relaxation times. We observe a dependence of the dynamics on e-e and e-p interaction strengths that is universal to most metals and is also counterintuitive. While only e-p interactions reduce the total energy stored by excited electrons, the time for energy to leave the electronic subsystem also depends on e-e interaction strengths because e-e interactions increase the number of electrons emitting phonons. The effect of e-e interactions on energy-relaxation is largest in metals with strong e-p interactions. Finally, the time high energy electron states remain occupied depends only on the strength of e-e interactions, even if e-p scattering rates are much greater than e-e scattering rates. 

   more » « less