More Like this

1. Disturbance impacts on land surface temperature and gross primary productivity in the western United States: Biophysical Impacts of Disturbance

   https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JG003622  

   Cooper, L. Annie ; Ballantyne, Ashley P. ; Holden, Zachary A. ; Landguth, Erin L. ( April 2017 , Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences)
2. Disturbance detection in landsat time series is influenced by tree mortality agent and severity, not by prior disturbance

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.112244  

   Rodman, Kyle C. ; Andrus, Robert A. ; Veblen, Thomas T. ; Hart, Sarah J. ( March 2021 , Remote Sensing of Environment)
3. Improving ecosystem-scale modeling of evapotranspiration using ecological mechanisms that account for compensatory responses following disturbance: MODELING ECOHYDROLOGICAL DISTURBANCE

   https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020823  

   Millar, David J. ; Ewers, Brent E. ; Mackay, D. Scott ; Peckham, Scott ; Reed, David E. ; Sekoni, Adewale ( September 2017 , Water Resources Research)
4. Disturbance ecology and the problem of n  = 1: A proposed framework for unifying disturbance ecology studies to address theory across multiple ecological systems

   https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13702  

   Buma, Brian ( December 2021 , Methods in Ecology and Evolution)
5. Disturbance macroecology: a comparative study of community structure metrics in a high‐severity disturbance regime

   https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3022  

   Newman, Erica A. ; Wilber, Mark Q. ; Kopper, Karen E. ; Moritz, Max A. ; Falk, Donald A. ; McKenzie, Don ; Harte, John ( January 2020 , Ecosphere)

   Macroecological studies have established widespread patterns of species diversity and abundance in ecosystems but have generally restricted their scope to relatively steady‐state systems. As a result, how macroecological metrics are expected to scale in ecosystems that experience natural disturbance regimes is unknown. We examine macroecological patterns in a fire‐dependent forest of Bishop pine (Pinus muricata). We target two different‐aged stands in a stand‐replacing fire regime: a mature stand with a diverse understory and with no history of major disturbance for at least 40 yr, and one disturbed by a stand‐replacing fire 17 yr prior to measurement. We compare properties of these stands with macroecological predictions from the Maximum Entropy Theory of Ecology (METE), an information entropy‐based theory that has proven highly successful in predicting macroecological metrics in multiple ecosystems and taxa. Ecological patterns in the mature stand more closely matchMETEpredictions than do data from the more recently disturbed, mid‐seral stage stand. This suggestsMETE's predictions are more robust in late‐successional, slowly changing, or steady‐state systems than those in rapid flux with respect to species composition, abundances, and organisms’ sizes. Our findings highlight the need for a macroecological theory that incorporates natural disturbance, perturbations, and ecological dynamics into its predictive capabilities,more »because most natural systems are not in a steady state.

   « less