skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Experiences and opinions of health professional students participating in an opioid use disorder educational event
Abstract Introduction The objectives of this study were to describe health professional students' experiences and opinions about patients with opioid-use disorder (OUD), to summarize evaluation results from an OUD educational event and to compare results by sex, discipline, and clinical experience. Methods The OUD educational event lasted 75 minutes and covered the epidemiology of the opioid epidemic, evidence-based prevention and treatment services, stigma, and recommendations on how to improve care. An anonymous pre-event survey collected information on attendees' experiences and opinions about patients with OUD. The postevent survey collected information on the attendees' evaluation of the event. Results Forty percent of students reported having a friend or family member who has/had an OUD. A minority (29.1%) reported that they would be uncomfortable working with patients with OUD or would prefer not to interact with patients with OUD (27.7%). Overall, the event evaluation results were very positive, and 85.5% reported that the information would change or influence their clinical practices. The open-ended responses found that the content was informative (n = 36); the attendees liked the inclusion of statistics (n = 19) and that the content was locally focused (n = 13). Discussion Health professional students participating in this event had fewer negative opinions of patients with OUD than previous research has found, and this may, in part, be explained by their personal experiences. Overall, health professional students want to learn more about patients with OUD.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1951504
PAR ID:
10169309
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Mental Health Clinician
Volume:
10
Issue:
2
ISSN:
2168-9709
Page Range / eLocation ID:
49 to 54
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ; ; ; (, PLOS ONE)
    West, Brooke (Ed.)
    Objectives An Opioid Treatment Desert is an area with limited accessibility to medication-assisted treatment and recovery facilities for Opioid Use Disorder. We explored the concept of Opioid Treatment Deserts including racial differences in potential spatial accessibility and applied it to one Midwestern urban county using high resolution spatiotemporal data. Methods We obtained individual-level data from one Emergency Medical Services (EMS) agency (Columbus Fire Department) in Franklin County, Ohio. Opioid overdose events were based on EMS runs where naloxone was administered from 1/1/2013 to 12/31/2017. Potential spatial accessibility was measured as the time (in minutes) it would take an individual, who may decide to seek treatment after an opioid overdose, to travel from where they had the overdose event, which was a proxy measure of their residential location, to the nearest opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment provider that provided medically-assisted treatment (MAT). We estimated accessibility measures overall, by race and by four types of treatment providers (any type of MAT for OUD, Buprenorphine, Methadone, or Naltrexone). Areas were classified as an Opioid Treatment Desert if the estimate travel time to treatment provider (any type of MAT for OUD) was greater than a given threshold. We performed sensitivity analysis using a range of threshold values based on multiple modes of transportation (car and public transit) and using only EMS runs to home/residential location types. Results A total of 6,929 geocoded opioid overdose events based on data from EMS agencies were used in the final analysis. Most events occurred among 26–35 years old (34%), identified as White adults (56%) and male (62%). Median travel times and interquartile range (IQR) to closest treatment provider by car and public transit was 2 minutes (IQR: 3 minutes) and 17 minutes (IQR: 17 minutes), respectively. Several neighborhoods in the study area had limited accessibility to OUD treatment facilities and were classified as Opioid Treatment Deserts. Travel time by public transit for most treatment provider types and by car for Methadone-based treatment was significantly different between individuals who were identified as Black adults and White adults based on their race. Conclusions Disparities in access to opioid treatment exist at the sub-county level in specific neighborhoods and across racial groups in Columbus, Ohio and can be quantified and visualized using local public safety data (e.g., EMS runs). Identification of Opioid Treatment Deserts can aid multiple stakeholders better plan and allocate resources for more equitable access to MAT for OUD and, therefore, reduce the burden of the opioid epidemic while making better use of real-time public safety data to address a public health epidemic that has turned into a public safety crisis. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; ; (, Telemedicine and e-Health)
    Background: The implementation of telemedicine by healthcare providers was accelerated by the COVID‐19 pandemic and in most health systems has reached a lower but steady percentage of total visits. As health systems navigate the integration of telemedicine modalities into care delivery models, understanding the way each discipline can optimally utilize this technology has become increasingly important. The purpose of this study was to determine how specialists who perform surgical procedures as part of their practice want to implement telemedicine into their practice and when they believe it can be most effectively used within their work schedule. Methods: A survey regarding opinions about the use of telemedicine in the postoperative period was conducted in late 2019 prior to the onset of the COVID‐19 pandemic and re‐administered about one year later. The respondents were identified by department and division as physicians who perform at least some surgical procedures. All respondents practice as part of a single urban, academic, multispecialty group across the DC‐Maryland‐Virginia area. These healthcare professionals were asked about their experiences in telemedicine, willingness to incorporate telemedicine into their practice for post‐operative visits during their global surgical period, and their opinions on how accepting patients in general may be of telemedicine. The follow‐up survey provided an opportunity to examine how opinions evolved after having obligatory telehealth experience during the pandemic. Survey responses were analyzed and descriptive statistics are presented in this study. Results: A total of 77 unique respondents participated in the surveys, and we evaluated the responses of the 75 participants who had any telemedicine (TM) experience. Respondents were 74.7% male, 66.7% were aged 36‐55, and 46% had between 1‐10 years of practice experience while the rest reported >11 years of experience. Additionally, specialties included traditional surgical specialties, interventional radiology, ophthalmology, and dermatology. Of those who completed the second survey, 77.1% expressed that the COVID‐19 exposure to TM increased their interest in video TM follow‐ups for post‐operative visits. Respondents further believed that 93.6% of patients in general also express a similar sentiment. However, just 46.7% believe TM would increase their productivity even if the technological infrastructure was perfect. When asked about preferences for when they would perform TM visits, 40.0% said they would want to conduct them as a part of regular hours and 41.3% said they would want these visits during a dedicated time within working hours. If given the chance to offer TM outside regular hours or during the weekend, the majority of respondents was against it or unsure, 77.4% and 88.0%, respectively. Discussion: Although a majority of the respondents surveyed think patients are interested in telemedicine and are themselves interested in using telemedicine follow‐ups in the post‐surgical period, less than half believe that telemedicine would increase productivity. Also, there is great variability in preference for dedicated timeblocks for telemedicine versus integration into traditional clinic schedules. As health systems continue to iterate on optimal models to integrate telehealth into efficient care delivery, it is important to better understand how physicians performing surgical procedures consider the value proposition of telemedicine for post operative care. Further study is required to understand the barriers to utilizing telehealth and how its implementation could impact reimbursement, work hours, the future of work as well as patient access, patient convenience, and patient satisfaction. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; (, Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, June 25-28. Columbus, OH.)
    To gain a deeper understanding of the career decisions of undergraduate engineering students, this research paper explores the differences between students who show a high degree of career certainty and those who are rather uncertain about what their professional future should look like. These analyses were based on a dataset from a nationwide survey of engineering undergraduates (n=5,819) from 27 institutions in the United States. The survey was designed with an interest in understanding engineering students’ career pathways. For the purpose of this study, students were designated as either “career uncertain” or “career certain” according to their survey answers. Those two groups were then compared against a variety of background characteristics, past experiences and personality variables. The results suggest that career uncertain and career certain students do not differ on background variables such as gender, age or family income. However, when it comes to students’ past experiences, the percentage of students who had already gained internship experiences during their time in college was significantly higher among career certain students as compared to career uncertain students. As expected, seniors were more certain about their professional future than juniors. Similarly, a higher percentage of career certain students reported talking about their professional future with other students or faculty members more frequently. Furthermore, career certain students were significantly more likely to show a higher level of innovation self-efficacy and engineering task self-efficacy. In addition, career certain students were more likely to have career goals that involved innovation and they also considered several job characteristics as more important than did uncertain students. On average, career certain engineering students were also more certain about staying in engineering one, five and ten years after graduation. Overall, the results of this research suggest that more hands-on experiences and fostering stronger beliefs in their engineering skills can contribute to undergraduates becoming more certain about their future professional careers. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; ; ; (, Addiction)
    Abstract AimsTo develop machine‐learning algorithms for predicting the risk of a hospitalization or emergency department (ED) visit for opioid use disorder (OUD) (i.e. OUD acute events) in Pennsylvania Medicaid enrollees in the Opioid Use Disorder Centers of Excellence (COE) program and to evaluate the fairness of model performance across racial groups. MethodsWe studied 20 983 United States Medicaid enrollees aged 18 years or older who had COE visits between April 2019 and March 2021. We applied multivariate logistic regression, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator models, random forests, and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), to predict OUD acute events following the initial COE visit. Our models included predictors at the system, patient, and regional levels. We assessed model performance using multiple metrics by racial groups. Individuals were divided into a low, medium and high‐risk group based on predicted risk scores. ResultsThe training (n = 13 990) and testing (n = 6993) samples displayed similar characteristics (mean age 38.1 ± 9.3 years, 58% male, 80% White enrollees) with 4% experiencing OUD acute events at baseline. XGB demonstrated the best prediction performance (C‐statistic = 76.6% [95% confidence interval = 75.6%–77.7%] vs. 72.8%–74.7% for other methods). At the balanced cutoff, XGB achieved a sensitivity of 68.2%, specificity of 70.0%, and positive predictive value of 8.3%. The XGB model classified the testing sample into high‐risk (6%), medium‐risk (30%), and low‐risk (63%) groups. In the high‐risk group, 40.7% had OUD acute events vs. 16.5% and 5.0% in the medium‐ and low‐risk groups. The high‐ and medium‐risk groups captured 44% and 26% of individuals with OUD events. The XGB model exhibited lower false negative rates and higher false positive rates in racial/ethnic minority groups than White enrollees. ConclusionsNew machine‐learning algorithms perform well to predict risks of opioid use disorder (OUD) acute care use among United States Medicaid enrollees and improve fairness of prediction across racial and ethnic groups compared with previous OUD‐related models. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; (, American Society for Engineering Education)
    National data indicates that engineering students are less likely than students in other academic disciplines to seek professional help for their mental health distress. Without professional intervention, mental health symptoms can worsen and become more challenging to treat. Therefore, this study uses a quantitative approach to investigate the beliefs that first-year engineering students hold about seeking mental health treatment and the influence of these beliefs on their intention to seek professional help. This study addresses the following research questions: 1) Which factors are most strongly associated with first-year engineering students’ intention to seek mental health treatment? 2) What beliefs about the outcomes of professional mental healthcare are most predictive of students’ intention to seek treatment? This study used a self-report survey instrument that employed the Integrated Behavioral Model (IBM) as an empirically supported theoretical framework to identify the beliefs that most accurately predict behavior. In December 2021, a survey was conducted in the first-year engineering program at a large public university with a predominantly White population (n = 452). The self-report survey instrument included measures of mental health help-seeking intention, attitude, perceived norm, personal agency, and outcome beliefs guided by the IBM. Respondents exhibited high scores on scales measuring their attitude towards seeking help, perceived control, and self-efficacy. This suggests that, on average, first-year engineering students had positive perceptions of their seeking help, felt in control of their decisions to seek help, and were confident in their ability to seek help. Students had lower scores for perceived norms, meaning they were less likely to believe that seeking help was supported by those who are important to them. Additionally, less than half of the students indicated they would intend to seek help if they experienced mental health distress. Students’ perception that others would expect them to seek help (i.e., their perceived norm injunctive) was the strongest predictor of intention to seek help, followed by their attitude toward seeking help. The specific outcome beliefs that were negatively correlated with intention to seek help were that seeking help would: 1) go against the expectations of the engineering community, 2) be a sign of weakness or an admission of defeat, and 3) result in poor treatment or discrimination from the mental health professional. Conversely, the outcome beliefs most positively correlated with intention were that seeking help would: 1) help me feel supported, 2) help me improve my coping skills, 3) make me feel better, 4) help me find a solution to my problem, and 5) help me gain a better understanding of my mental health concern. The findings of this study offer valuable insights into the beliefs of first-year engineering students towards seeking professional treatment for mental health concerns. These findings will inform the development of targeted interventions to improve help-seeking for mental health. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email