skip to main content

Title: Learning to Reason with Data: How Did We Get Here and What Do We Know?
Authors:
Award ID(s):
1917653 1742255
Publication Date:
NSF-PAR ID:
10184954
Journal Name:
Journal of the Learning Sciences
Volume:
29
Issue:
1
Page Range or eLocation-ID:
154 to 164
ISSN:
1050-8406
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract. Despite the centrality of the water balance equation to hydrology and waterresources, in 2018 we still lack adequate empirical observations ofconsumptive use of water by humans and their economy. It is therefore worthconsidering what we can do with the withdrawal-based water use data wealready possess, and what future water census measurements would be requiredto more accurately quantify consumptive use for the most common mesoscale usecases. The limitations of the currently applied simple net consumptive use(SNCU) assumptions are discussed for several common use cases. Fortunately,several applied water management, economics, and policy questions can besufficiently addressed using currently available withdrawal numbers in placeof water consumption numbers. This discussion clarifies the broadrequirements for an improved “stock and flow” census-scale data model forconsumptive water use. While we are waiting for the eventual arrival of amore sophisticated water census, the withdrawal data we already possess aresufficient for some of our most important scientific and applied purposes.

  2. It is believed that if students are well engaged in the learning process within the classroom, they will continue the learning process independently outside the classroom. To facilitate such out-of-class learning, there is a plethora of traditional techniques with a variety of learning theoretical backgrounds. While out-of-class activities based on these techniques have shown to improve a student’s overall quality of learning, traditional activities lack the supervision, instant feedback, and personalization that the current generation of students expects. With the rising cost of college tuition, many of today’s students are working more hours outside of an educational setting and therefore need more supervision and encouragement than their predecessors. These factors make traditional out-of-class activities not effective to achieve the desired level of student learning and engagement outside the classroom. The faculty needs to rethink ways to redesign traditional out-of-class activities to make these activities more effective for this generation of students. This paper presents a review of the literature on and categorization of traditional out-of-class activities. The paper also discusses the results of a survey of what the faculty is doing to engage and continue student learning outside the classroom. Finally, the paper presents a new way of designing andmore »delivering out-of-class activities that have the potential to increase student engagement with the help of instructional scaffolding, interactive activities, and personalization and adaptation.« less