skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Invasive grasses increase fire occurrence and frequency across US ecoregions
Fire-prone invasive grasses create novel ecosystem threats by increasing fine-fuel loads and continuity, which can alter fire regimes. While the existence of an invasive grass-fire cycle is well known, evidence of altered fire regimes is typically based on local-scale studies or expert knowledge. Here, we quantify the effects of 12 nonnative, invasive grasses on fire occurrence, size, and frequency across 29 US ecoregions encompassing more than one third of the conterminous United States. These 12 grass species promote fire locally and have extensive spatial records of abundant infestations. We combined agency and satellite fire data with records of abundant grass invasion to test for differences in fire regimes between invaded and nearby “uninvaded” habitat. Additionally, we assessed whether invasive grass presence is a significant predictor of altered fire by modeling fire occurrence, size, and frequency as a function of grass invasion, in addition to anthropogenic and ecological covariates relevant to fire. Eight species showed significantly higher fire-occurrence rates, which more than tripled for Schismus barbatus and Pennisetum ciliare. Six species demonstrated significantly higher mean fire frequency, which more than doubled for Neyraudia reynaudiana and Pennisetum ciliare . Grass invasion was significant in fire occurrence and frequency models, but not in fire-size models. The significant differences in fire regimes, coupled with the importance of grass invasion in modeling these differences, suggest that invasive grasses alter US fire regimes at regional scales. As concern about US wildfires grows, accounting for fire-promoting invasive grasses will be imperative for effectively managing ecosystems.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1740267
PAR ID:
10187234
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Volume:
116
Issue:
47
ISSN:
0027-8424
Page Range / eLocation ID:
23594 to 23599
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract Invasion by non‐native annual grasses poses a serious threat to native vegetation in California, facilitated through interaction with wildfires. Our work is the first attempt to use the coupled fire‐atmosphere model, WRF‐Fire, to investigate how shifts from native, shrub‐dominated vegetation to invasive grasses could have affected a known wildfire event in southern California. We simulate the Mountain Fire, which burned >11,000 ha in July 2013, under idealized fuel conditions representing varying extents of grass invasion. Expanding grass to double its observed coverage causes fire to spread faster due to the lower fuel load in grasses and increased wind speed. Beyond this, further grass expansion reduces the simulated spread rate because lower heat release partially offsets the positive effects. Our simulations suggest that grass expansion may generally promote larger faster‐spreading wildfires in southern California, motivating continued efforts to contain and reduce the spread of invasive annual grasses in this region. 
    more » « less
  2. Abstract Fire exclusion and mismanaged grazing are globally important drivers of environmental change in mesic C4grasslands and savannas. Although interest is growing in prescribed fire for grassland restoration, we have little long‐term experimental evidence of the influence of burn season on the recovery of herbaceous plant communities, encroachment by trees and shrubs, and invasion by exotic grasses. We conducted a prescribed fire experiment (seven burns between 2001 and 2019) in historically fire‐excluded and overgrazed grasslands of central Texas. Sites were assigned to one of four experimental treatments: summer burns (warm season, lightning season), fall burns (early cool season), winter burns (late cool season), or unburned (fire exclusion). To assess restoration outcomes of the experiment, in 2019, we identified old‐growth grasslands to serve as reference sites. Herbaceous‐layer plant communities in all experimental sites were compositionally and functionally distinct from old‐growth grasslands, with little recovery of perennial C4grasses and long‐lived forbs. Unburned sites were characterized by several species of tree, shrub, and vine; summer sites were characterized by certain C3grasses and forbs; and fall and winter sites were intermediate in composition to the unburned and summer sites. Despite compositional differences, all treatments had comparable plot‐level plant species richness (range 89–95 species/1000 m2). At the local‐scale, summer sites (23 species/m2) and old‐growth grasslands (20 species/m2) supported greater richness than unburned sites (15 species/m2), but did not differ significantly from fall or winter sites. Among fire treatments, summer and winter burns most consistently produced the vegetation structure of old‐growth grasslands (e.g., mean woody canopy cover of 9%). But whereas winter burns promoted the invasive grassBothriochloa ischaemumby maintaining areas with low canopy cover, summer burns simultaneously limited woody encroachment and controlledB. ischaemuminvasion. Our results support a growing body of literature that shows that prescribed fire alone, without the introduction of plant propagules, cannot necessarily restore old‐growth grassland community composition. Nonetheless, this long‐term experiment demonstrates that prescribed burns implemented in the summer can benefit restoration by preventing woody encroachment while also controlling an invasive grass. We suggest that fire season deserves greater attention in grassland restoration planning and ecological research. 
    more » « less
  3. Understanding the indirect and interactive effects of environmental stressors is critical to planning conservation interventions, but such effects are poorly understood. For example, invasive species may modify fire effects by altering fire intensity or frequency, increasing or decreasing their abundance in response to fire, and/or changing the trajectory of post‐fire recovery. Without a clear understanding of the direct, indirect, and interactive effects of prescribed fire and invasive species on native plants, managers cannot design effective conservation measures and risk exacerbating invasion through fire or wasting resources on approaches that do not yield desired results. In this study, researchers worked directly with the manager of a wet meadow in southern Idaho to explore how prescribed fire would directly and indirectly impact an iconic native herb (Camassia quamash) in areas invaded by a perennial pasture grass (Alopecurus arundinaceus). We found that spring prescribed fire increased the abundance of invasiveA. arundinaceus, which indirectly strengthened its suppression ofC. quamashgrowth and reproduction. In contrast, fire reversed the negative influence ofA. arundinaceusonC. quamashsurvival. Survival rates ofC. quamashwere higher after fire in areas with greater invasive grass abundance. This study points to the importance of understanding the indirect and interactive effects of prescribed fire and invasives on native plants across their life cycle for restoration projects and suggests fire, at least in spring, is not an appropriate management strategy for reducingA. arundinaceusinvasion at this site. 
    more » « less
  4. Gomory, Dusan (Ed.)
    The expansion of woody plants into grasslands and old fields is often ascribed to fire suppression and heavy grazing, especially by domestic livestock. However, it is also recognized that nutrient availability and interspecific competition with grasses and other woody plants play a role in certain habitats. I examined potential factors causing range- and niche expansion by the eastern redcedar Juniperus virginiana , the most widespread conifer in the eastern United States, in multifactorial experiments in a greenhouse. Historical records suggest that the eastern redcedar is a pioneer forest species, and may be replaced as the forest increases in tree density due to shading. Another possible factor that affects its distribution may be nutrient availability, which is higher in old fields and other disturbed lands than in undisturbed habitats. In its historic range, eastern redcedars are particularly abundant on limestone outcrops, often termed ‘cedar barrens’. However, the higher abundance on limestone could be due to reduced interspecific competition rather than a preference for high pH substrates. I manipulated shade, fertilization, lime, and interspecific competition with a common dominant tree, the post oak Quercus stellata . In a separate experiment, I manipulated fire and grass competition. I measured growth rates (height and diameter) and above- and belowground biomass at the end of both experiments. I also measured total non-structural carbohydrates and nitrogen in these plants. Shade was the most important factor limiting the growth rates and biomass of eastern redcedars. I also found that there were significant declines in nitrogen and non-structural carbohydrates when shaded. These results are consistent with the notion that the eastern redcedar is a pioneer forest species, and that shade is the reason that these redcedars are replaced by other tree species. In the second experiment, I found that a single fire had a negative effect on young trees. There was no significant effect of competition with grass, perhaps because the competitive effect was shading by grasses and not nutrient depletion. Overall, the effects of shade were far more apparent than the effects of fire. 
    more » « less
  5. Abstract The Trophic Disruption Hypothesis (TDH) predicts that invasive species may cause native species to undergo trophic dispersion (change in trophic‐niche area) and trophic displacement (diet switching), predictably altering food‐web structure and biodiversity. In Everglades National Park, Florida, USA, African Jewelfish (Rubricatochromis letourneuxi) density has recently (2012–2017) undergone a boom‐bust cycle, linked to declines of native taxa and altered aquatic‐community composition that persist after the bust. Everglades restoration efforts seek to restore historic hydrologic conditions that may contribute to food‐web changes unfolding coincidentally with the jewelfish boom. We used complementary datasets of stomach contents and stable isotopes (δ15N and δ13C) to quantify pre‐ and post‐invasion consumer diets, trophic positions, trophic niches, basal energy use (autotrophic vs. heterotrophic), and energy fluxes to test assumptions of the TDH. The direction of change for these metrics from dry season to wet‐season post‐invasion (i.e., effect of adding water) was used as a proxy for the direction of effects from restored water delivery. For trophic shifts attributable to jewelfish invasion, we tested assumptions of the TDH. Comparing pre‐ versus post‐invasion for native consumers, we observed trophic displacement in 42% of species size classes (based on stomach contents), trophic dispersion for 57% of species (based on stable isotopes) and 54% of species size classes (based on stomach contents), and overall greater reliance on autotrophic energy. Altered trophic dynamics were more frequent pre‐ versus post‐invasion than among habitats or between seasons, and the direction of those responses was in the opposite direction of dry‐season to wet‐season differences and/or occurred at a higher frequency. Post‐invasion food‐web structure and function revealed increased relative abundance of mesopredators (including African Jewelfish) and reduced biomass and energy fluxes into and out of small fishes (e.g., Cyprinodontiformes). Our results show that African Jewelfish invasion is linked to altered spatiotemporal trophic dynamics and energy fluxes through declines in native fishes and invertebrates, which indirectly affected trophic relationships at the regional scale in the Everglades. As a result, we suggest extending the TDH to explicitly include the potential for invasive species to alter basal energy use, spatiotemporal trophic dynamics, and energy fluxes. 
    more » « less