More Like this

1. Modified embedded-atom method interatomic potentials for Al-Cu, Al-Fe and Al-Ni binary alloys: From room temperature to melting point

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110902  

   Mahata, Avik; Mukhopadhyay, Tanmoy; Asle Zaeem, Mohsen (January 2022, Computational Materials Science)
2. Viscoelastic mechanical properties measurement of thin Al and Al–Mg films using bulge testing

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2016.03.064  

   Huang, An-Wen; Lu, Cheng-Hua; Wu, Shao-Chi; Chen, Tzu-Ching; Vinci, Richard P.; Brown, Walter L.; Lin, Ming-Tzer (November 2016, Thin Solid Films)
3. Thanks to Song et al.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2021.08.001  

   Lowe, Winsor H.; Martin, Thomas E.; Skelly, David K.; Woods, H. Arthur (November 2021, Trends in Ecology & Evolution)
4. Comment to Koschorreck et al.

   https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2020-307-AC3, 2020  

   Trentman, Matt; Hall, Robert; Blaszozak, Joanna (October 2020, Biogeosciences)

   null (Ed.)
5. Why do Fe–Al Alloys Show Good Passivation Behavior in Acids Compared to Elemental Al?

   https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/acb972  

   Bai, Qingguo; Sieradzki, Karl (February 2023, Journal of The Electrochemical Society)

   We present some general concepts and pose questions connected to the difference between the ambient temperature passive film formed on elemental aluminum in acid vs that which forms on iron-aluminum alloys containing less than about 35–40 at% Al. Data is presented which demonstrates that the non-protective oxide that forms on aluminum is not related to impurity effects, either in the matrix or in grain boundaries.We argue that the ability of aluminum to form a protective passive film in a single-phase solid solution alloy is connected to atomic-scale size effects that vanish once the aluminum concentration increases to about 60 at%. 

   more » « less