An official website of the United States government
Abstract The use of two‐dimensional images to teach students about three‐dimensional molecules continues to be a prevalent issue in many classrooms. As affordable visualization technologies continue to advance, there has been an increasing interest to utilize novel technology, such as augmented reality (AR), in the development of molecular visualization tools. Existing evaluations of these visual–spatial learning tools focus primarily on student performance and attitude, with little attention toward potential inequity in student participation. Our study adds to the current literature on introducing molecular visualization technology in biochemistry classrooms by examining the potential inequity in a group activity mediated by AR technology. Adapting the participatory equity framework to our specific context, we view equity and inequity in terms of access to the technological conversational floor, a social space created when people enter technology‐mediated joint endeavors. We explore three questions: What are the different ways students interact with an AR model of the potassium channel? What are salient patterns of participation that may signify inequity in classroom technology use? What is the interplay between group social dynamics and the introduction of AR technology in the context of a technology‐mediated group activity? Pairing qualitative analysis with quantitative metrics, our mixed‐methods approach produced a complex story of student participation in an AR‐mediated group activity. The patterns of student participation showed that equity and inequity in an AR‐mediated biochemistry group learning activity are fluid and multifaceted. It was observed that students who gave more explanations during group discussion also had more interactions with the AR model (i.e., they had greater access to the technological conversational floor), and their opinion of the AR model may have greater influence on how their group engage with the AR model. This study provides more nuanced ways of conceptualizing equity and inequity in biochemistry learning settings.
more »
« less
Understanding Augmented Reality Tools in Maker Spaces
Augmented reality (AR) can be a useful educational tool which allows the representation of concepts that are otherwise invisible and difficult to visualize. We designed an augmented reality tool (the Holoboard) for learning about circuits and voltage, and deployed it in a summer school course for students to use. The students were hesitant to use the tool for several reasons, but those who did had a positive experience and found the tool to be helpful. Overall, tools were used by students who had an independent approach to problem-solving, and students preferred tools that were easily accessible and did not disrupt their workflow. We conclude with suggestions to improve the Holoboard to tailor it to the needs of students.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1748093
- PAR ID:
- 10196261
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- International Conference of the Learning Sciences
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Computing theory is often perceived as challenging by students, and verifying the correctness of a student’s automaton or grammar is time-consuming for instructors. Aiming to provide benefits to both students and instructors, we designed an automated feedback tool for assignments where students construct automata or grammars. Our tool, built as an extension to the widely popular JFLAP software, determines if a submission is correct, and for incorrect submissions it provides a “witness” string demonstrating the incorrectness. We studied the usage and benefits of our tool in two terms, Fall 2019 and Spring 2021. Each term, students in one section of the Introduction to Computer Science Theory course were required to use our tool for sample homework questions targeting DFAs, NFAs, RegExs, CFGs, and PDAs. In Fall 2019, this was a regular section of the course.We also collected comparison data from another section that did not use our tool but had the same instructor and homework assignments. In Spring 2021, a smaller honors section provided the perspective from this demographic. Overall, students who used the tool reported that it helped them to not only solve the homework questions (and they performed better than the comparison group) but also to better understand the underlying theory concept. They were engaged with the tool: almost all persisted with their attempts until their submission was correct despite not being able to random walk to a solution. This indicates that witness feedback, a succinct explanation of incorrectness, is effective. Additionally, it assisted instructors with assignment grading.more » « less
-
Background: Previous work has shown that students can understand more complicated pieces of code through the use of common software development tools (code execution, debuggers) than they can without them. Objectives: Given that tools can enable novice programmers to understand more complex code, we believe that students should be explicitly taught to do so, to facilitate their plan acquisition and development as independent programmers. In order to do so, this paper seeks to understand: (1) the relative utility of these tools, (2) the thought process students use to choose a tool, and (3) the degree to which students can choose an appropriate tool to understand a given piece of code. Method: We used a mixed-methods approach. To explore the relative effectiveness of the tools, we used a randomized control trial study (𝑁 = 421) to observe student performance with each tool in understanding a range of different code snippets. To explore tool selection, we used a series of think-aloud interviews (𝑁 = 18) where students were presented with a range of code snippets to understand and were allowed to choose which tool they wanted to use. Findings: Overall, novices were more often successful comprehending code when provided with access to code execution, perhaps because it was easier to test a larger set of inputs than the debugger. As code complexity increased (as indicated by cyclomatic complexity), students become more successful with the debugger. We found that novices preferred code execution for simpler or familiar code, to quickly verify their understanding and used the debugger on more complex or unfamiliar code or when they were confused about a small subset of the code. High-performing novices were adept at switching between tools, alternating from a detail-oriented to a broader perspective of the code and vice versa, when necessary. Novices who were unsuccessful tended to be overconfident in their incorrect understanding or did not display a willingness to double check their answers using a debugger. Implications: We can likely teach novices to independently understand code they do not recognize by utilizing code execution and debuggers. Instructors should teach students to recognize when code is complex (e.g., large number of nested loops present), and to carefully step through these loops using debuggers. We should additionally teach students to be cautious to double check their understanding of the code and to self-assess whether they are familiar with the code. They can also be encouraged to strategically switch between execution and debuggers to manage cognitive load, thus maximizing their problem-solving capabilities.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Immersive technologies such as Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR) have become the worldwide huge technological innovations impacting human life significantly. While the VR is an enclosed environment separated completely from the real world, AR allows users to merge the digital and physical worlds and enable the interaction between them. The wide usage of AR has led researchers to investigate its potential capability in several areas including STEM-related fields. Previous research shows that AR assisted courses tend to enhance students’ learning, spatial cognition, increase the students’ motivation and engagement in the learning process. In this study, the researchers have developed an AR application to assist students with spatial cognition and remote course engagement independently. The ARCADE tool enables students to not only visualize the isometric product from its orthogonal views, but it also provides short tutorial clips on how a specific feature was developed and what tools were used. The students can perform basic modifications on the 3D part in the ARCADE such as section views, details views, scale, rotate and explode the assembly views. Although this project is a work in progress, the preliminary pretest and posttest results show there is a significant improvement in students’ spatial cognition when the proposed tool is used to assist the course.more » « less
-
This paper describes the use of a freely-accessible open-source platform based on Google Apps for Education that combines Google Sites, Google Docs, Google Drive, Google Hangouts and script language in a custom-based interface that supports collaborative service-learning projects for teams of Engineering and Education students. The approach discussed in this paper was successful in promoting collaboration among students from two different disciplines working remotely. The analysis suggests that balanced participation in the team, presence of shared goals and clear roles that emphasized individual and collective responsibilities were key to a successful interdisciplinary project experience. While many students still reported struggling with normal teamwork challenges, like finding common meeting times, others were pleased with the dynamics of their team and the opportunity to learn from one another. While SCOL, the open-source collaboration tool, did not significantly predict team satisfaction, the instructors found it very valuable for structuring project tasks, monitoring student progress, and providing timely feedback. The tool was seen as critical in supporting cross-disciplinary course collaboration for which students had limited access to face-to-face interaction. Faculty emphasized the importance of training students to use the asynchronous communication and collaboration tools (e.g., Google Docs and Google Hangouts) to maximize the benefits for students. Training will be included in future implementations of SCOL to ensure a more effective use of the platform.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- The DOI is not currently available.
