skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: A Non-Parametric Approach for Setting Safety Stock Levels
In practice, lead time demand (LTD) can be non-standard: skewed, multi-modal or highly variable; factors that compromise the validity of the classic approaches for setting safety stock levels. Motivated by encountering this problem at our industry partner, we develop an approach for setting safety stock levels using the bootstrap, a widely-used statistical procedure. We extend prior research that has used the bootstrap for quantile estimation to address the multi-parameter estimation of safety stocks. We develop a multivariate central limit theorem for the bootstrap mean and bootstrap quantile -- components of the safety stock calculation -- highlighting why the generalization of these bootstrap methods is critical for inventory management. These results provide a theoretical underpinning for the bootstrap estimator of safety stock and permit the construction of confidence intervals for safety stock estimates, allowing decision makers to understand the reliability with which the desired service level will be achieved. Building on our theoretical results, and supported by numerical experiments, we provide insights on the behavior of the bootstrap for various LTD distributions, which our results demonstrate are critical when employing the bootstrap method. Implementation results with our industry partner indicate our approach is quite effective in setting safety stock levels.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1726534
PAR ID:
10196965
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
SSRN Electronic Journal
ISSN:
1556-5068
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. null (Ed.)
    Abstract This paper establishes non-asymptotic concentration bound and Bahadur representation for the quantile regression estimator and its multiplier bootstrap counterpart in the random design setting. The non-asymptotic analysis keeps track of the impact of the parameter dimension $$d$$ and sample size $$n$$ in the rate of convergence, as well as in normal and bootstrap approximation errors. These results represent a useful complement to the asymptotic results under fixed design and provide theoretical guarantees for the validity of Rademacher multiplier bootstrap in the problems of confidence construction and goodness-of-fit testing. Numerical studies lend strong support to our theory and highlight the effectiveness of Rademacher bootstrap in terms of accuracy, reliability and computational efficiency. 
    more » « less
  2. We propose a simple modification procedure that helps to compare the levels and powers for conservative multiplier bootstrap tests. It is especially useful for simulation studies where empirical levels are zero. We provide a theoretical justification and illustrate the use of the procedure in a recent class of multiplier bootstrap tests for quantile regression and in a recent class of high-dimensional tests for MANOVA. 
    more » « less
  3. Triangular systems with nonadditively separable unobserved heterogeneity provide a theoretically appealing framework for the modeling of complex structural relationships. However, they are not commonly used in practice due to the need for exogenous variables with large support for identification, the curse of dimensionality in estimation, and the lack of inferential tools. This paper introduces two classes of semiparametric nonseparable triangular models that address these limitations. They are based on distribution and quantile regression modeling of the reduced form conditional distributions of the endogenous variables. We show that average, distribution, and quantile structural functions are identified in these systems through a control function approach that does not require a large support condition. We propose a computationally attractive three‐stage procedure to estimate the structural functions where the first two stages consist of quantile or distribution regressions. We provide asymptotic theory and uniform inference methods for each stage. In particular, we derive functional central limit theorems and bootstrap functional central limit theorems for the distribution regression estimators of the structural functions. These results establish the validity of the bootstrap for three‐stage estimators of structural functions, and lead to simple inference algorithms. We illustrate the implementation and applicability of all our methods with numerical simulations and an empirical application to demand analysis. 
    more » « less
  4. In stochastic simulation, input uncertainty refers to the output variability arising from the statistical noise in specifying the input models. This uncertainty can be measured by a variance contribution in the output, which, in the nonparametric setting, is commonly estimated via the bootstrap. However, due to the convolution of the simulation noise and the input noise, the bootstrap consists of a two-layer sampling and typically requires substantial simulation effort. This paper investigates a subsampling framework to reduce the required effort, by leveraging the form of the variance and its estimation error in terms of the data size and the sampling requirement in each layer. We show how the total required effort can be reduced from an order bigger than the data size in the conventional approach to an order independent of the data size in subsampling. We explicitly identify the procedural specifications in our framework that guarantee relative consistency in the estimation and the corresponding optimal simulation budget allocations. We substantiate our theoretical results with numerical examples. 
    more » « less
  5. We present a shared control paradigm that improves a user’s ability to operate complex, dynamic systems in potentially dangerous environments without a priori knowledge of the user’s objective. In this paradigm, the role of the autonomous partner is to improve the general safety of the system without constraining the user’s ability to achieve unspecified behaviors. Our approach relies on a data-driven,model-based representation of the joint human-machine system to evaluate, in parallel, a significant number of potential inputs that the user may wish to provide. These samples are used to (1)predict the safety of the system over a receding horizon, and (2)minimize the influence of the autonomous partner. The resulting shared control algorithm maximizes the authority allocated to the human partner to improve their sense of agency, while improving safety. We evaluate the efficacy of our shared control algorithm with a human subjects study (n=20) conducted in two simulated environments: a balance bot and a race car. During the experiment, users are free to operate each system however they would like (i.e., there is no specified task) and are only asked to try to avoid unsafe regions of the state space. Using modern computational resources (i.e., GPUs) our approach is able to consider more than 10,000 potential trajectories at each time step in a control loop running at 100Hz for the balance bot and 60Hzfor the race car. The results of the study show that our shared control paradigm improves system safety without knowledge of the user’s goal, while maintaining high-levels of user satisfaction and low-levels of frustration. Our code is available online athttps://github.com/asbroad/mpmisharedcontrol. 
    more » « less