Outer membrane protein (OMP) biogenesis in gram‐negative bacteria is managed by a network of periplasmic chaperones that includes SurA, Skp, and FkpA. These chaperones bind unfolded OMPs (uOMPs) in dynamic conformational ensembles to suppress aggregation, facilitate diffusion across the periplasm, and enhance folding. FkpA primarily responds to heat‐shock stress, but its mechanism is comparatively understudied. To determine FkpA chaperone function in the context of OMP folding, we monitored the folding of three OMPs and found that FkpA, unlike other periplasmic chaperones, increases the folded yield but decreases the folding rate of OMPs. The results indicate that FkpA behaves as a chaperone and not as a folding catalyst to influence the OMP folding trajectory. Consistent with the folding assay results, FkpA binds all three uOMPs as determined by sedimentation velocity (SV) and photo‐crosslinking experiments. We determine the binding affinity between FkpA and uOmpA171by globally fitting SV titrations and find it to be intermediate between the known affinities of Skp and SurA for uOMP clients. Notably, complex formation steeply depends on the urea concentration, suggesting an extensive binding interface. Initial characterizations of the complex using photo‐crosslinking indicate that the binding interface spans the entire FkpA molecule. In contrast to prior findings, folding and binding experiments performed using subdomain constructs of FkpA demonstrate that the full‐length chaperone is required for full activity. Together these results support that FkpA has a distinct and direct effect on OMP folding that it achieves by utilizing an extensive chaperone‐client interface to tightly bind clients.
The periplasmic chaperone network ensures the biogenesis of bacterial outer membrane proteins (OMPs) and has recently been identified as a promising target for antibiotics. SurA is the most important member of this network, both due to its genetic interaction with the β-barrel assembly machinery complex as well as its ability to prevent unfolded OMP (uOMP) aggregation. Using only binding energy, the mechanism by which SurA carries out these two functions is not well-understood. Here, we use a combination of photo-crosslinking, mass spectrometry, solution scattering, and molecular modeling techniques to elucidate the key structural features that define how SurA solubilizes uOMPs. Our experimental data support a model in which SurA binds uOMPs in a groove formed between the core and P1 domains. This binding event results in a drastic expansion of the rest of the uOMP, which has many biological implications. Using these experimental data as restraints, we adopted an integrative modeling approach to create a sparse ensemble of models of a SurA•uOMP complex. We validated key structural features of the SurA•uOMP ensemble using independent scattering and chemical crosslinking data. Our data suggest that SurA utilizes three distinct binding modes to interact with uOMPs and that more than one SurA can bind a uOMP at a time. This work demonstrates that SurA operates in a distinct fashion compared to other chaperones in the OMP biogenesis network.
more » « less- Award ID(s):
- 1931211
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10198880
- Publisher / Repository:
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Volume:
- 117
- Issue:
- 45
- ISSN:
- 0027-8424
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- p. 28026-28035
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
more » « less
Abstract -
more » « less
Abstract SurA is thought to be the most important periplasmic chaperone for outer membrane protein (OMP) biogenesis. Its structure is composed of a core region and two peptidylprolyl isomerase domains, termed P1 and P2, connected by flexible linkers. As such these three independent folding units are able to adopt a number of distinct spatial positions with respect to each other. The conformational dynamics of these domains are thought to be functionally important yet are largely unresolved. Here we address this question of the conformational ensemble using sedimentation equilibrium, small‐angle neutron scattering, and folding titrations. This combination of orthogonal methods converges on a SurA population that is monomeric at physiological concentrations. The conformation that dominates this population has the P1 and core domains docked to one another, for example, “P1‐closed” and the P2 domain extended in solution. We discovered that the distribution of domain orientations is defined by modest and favorable interactions between the core domain and either the P1 or the P2 domains. These two peptidylprolyl domains compete with each other for core‐binding but are thermodynamically uncoupled. This arrangement implies two novel insights. Firstly, an open conformation must exist to facilitate P1 and P2 exchange on the core, indicating that the open client‐binding conformation is populated at low levels even in the absence of client unfolded OMPs. Secondly, competition between P1 and P2 binding paradoxically occludes the client binding site on the core, which may serve to preserve the reservoir of binding‐competent apo‐SurA in the periplasm.
-
more » « less
Abstract SurA, Skp, FkpA, and DegP constitute a chaperone network that ensures biogenesis of outer membrane proteins (OMPs) in Gram‐negative bacteria. Both Skp and FkpA are holdases that prevent the self‐aggregation of unfolded OMPs, whereas SurA accelerates folding and DegP is a protease. None of these chaperones is essential, and we address here how functional plasticity is manifested in nine known null strains. Using a comprehensive computational model of this network termed OMPBioM, our results suggest that a threshold level of steady state holdase occupancy by chaperones is required, but the cell is agnostic to the specific holdase molecule fulfilling this function. In addition to its foldase activity, SurA moonlights as a holdase when there is no expression of Skp and FkpA. We further interrogate the importance of chaperone–client complex lifetime by conducting simulations using lifetime values for Skp complexes that range in length by six orders of magnitude. This analysis suggests that transient occupancy of durations much shorter than the
Escherichia coli doubling time is required. We suggest that fleeting chaperone occupancy facilitates rapid sampling of the periplasmic conditions, which ensures that the cell can be adept at responding to environmental changes. Finally, we calculated the network effects of adding multivalency by computing populations that include two Skp trimers per unfolded OMP. We observe only modest perturbations to the system. Overall, this quantitative framework of chaperone–protein interactions in the periplasm demonstrates robust plasticity due to its dynamic binding and unbinding behavior. -
Outer membrane proteins (OMPs) must exist as an unfolded ensemble while interacting with a chaperone network in the periplasm of Gram-negative bacteria. Here, we developed a method to model unfolded OMP (uOMP) conformational ensembles using the experimental properties of two well-studied OMPs. The overall sizes and shapes of the unfolded ensembles in the absence of a denaturant were experimentally defined by measuring the sedimentation coefficient as a function of urea concentration. We used these data to model a full range of unfolded conformations by parameterizing a targeted coarse-grained simulation protocol. The ensemble members were further refined by short molecular dynamics simulations to reflect proper torsion angles. The final conformational ensembles have polymer properties different from unfolded soluble and intrinsically disordered proteins and reveal inherent differences in the unfolded states that necessitate further investigation. Building these uOMP ensembles advances the understanding of OMP biogenesis and provides essential information for interpreting structures of uOMP-chaperone complexes.more » « less
-
more » « less
Abstract Vasodilator‐stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) family proteins play a crucial role in mediating the actin network architecture in the cytoskeleton. The Ena/VASP homology 2 (EVH2) domain in each of the four identical arms of the tetrameric VASP consists of a loading poly‐Pro region, a G‐actin‐binding domain (GAB), and an F‐actin‐binding domain (FAB). Together, the poly‐Pro, GAB, and FAB domains allow VASP to bind to sides of actin filaments in a bundle, and recruit profilin–G‐actin to processively elongate the filaments. The atomic resolution structure of the ternary complex, consisting of the loading poly‐Pro region and GAB domain of VASP with profilin–actin, has been solved over a decade ago; however, a detailed structure of the FAB‐F‐actin complex has not been resolved to date. Experimental insights, based on homology of the FAB domain with the C region of WASP, have been used to hypothesize that the FAB domain binds to the cleft between subdomains 1 and 3 of F‐actin. Here, in order to develop our understanding of the VASP–actin complex, we first augment known structural information about the GAB domain binding to actin with the missing FAB domain‐actin structure, which we predict using homology modeling and docking simulations. In earlier work, we used mutagenesis and kinetic modeling to study the role of domain‐level binding–unbinding kinetics of Ena/VASP on actin filaments in a bundle, specifically on the side of actin filaments. We further look at the nature of the side‐binding of the FAB domain of VASP at the atomistic level using our predicted structure, and tabulate effective mutation sites on the FAB domain that would disrupt the VASP–actin complex. We test the binding affinity of Ena with mutated FAB domain using total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy experiments. The binding affinity of VASP is affected significantly for the mutant, providing additional support for our predicted structure.
