An official website of the United States government
BackgroundLiving kidney donation currently constitutes approximately a quarter of all kidney donations. There exist barriers that preclude prospective donors from donating, such as medical ineligibility and costs associated with donation. A better understanding of perceptions of and barriers to living donation could facilitate the development of effective policies, education opportunities, and outreach strategies and may lead to an increased number of living kidney donations. Prior research focused predominantly on perceptions and barriers among a small subset of individuals who had prior exposure to the donation process. The viewpoints of the general public have rarely been represented in prior research. ObjectiveThe current study designed a web-scraping method and machine learning algorithms for collecting and classifying comments from a variety of online sources. The resultant data set was made available in the public domain to facilitate further investigation of this topic. MethodsWe collected comments using Python-based web-scraping tools from the New York Times, YouTube, Twitter, and Reddit. We developed a set of guidelines for the creation of training data and manual classification of comments as either related to living organ donation or not. We then classified the remaining comments using deep learning. ResultsA total of 203,219 unique comments were collected from the above sources. The deep neural network model had 84% accuracy in testing data. Further validation of predictions found an actual accuracy of 63%. The final database contained 11,027 comments classified as being related to living kidney donation. ConclusionsThe current study lays the groundwork for more comprehensive analyses of perceptions, myths, and feelings about living kidney donation. Web-scraping and machine learning classifiers are effective methods to collect and examine opinions held by the general public on living kidney donation.
more »
« less
The impact of country reimbursement programmes on living kidney donations
Introduction Living-donor kidney transplantation is the gold standard treatment for patients with end-stage kidney disease. However, potential donors ubiquitously face financial as well as logistical barriers. To remove these disincentives from living kidney donations, the governments of 23 countries have implemented reimbursement programmes that shift the burdens of non-medical costs from donors to the governments or private entities. However, scientific evidence for the effectiveness of these programmes is scarce. The present study investigates whether these reimbursement programmes designed to ease the financial and logistical barriers succeeded in increasing the number of living kidney donations at the country level. The study examined within-country variations in the timing of such reimbursement programmes. Method The study applied the difference-in-difference (two-way panel fixed-effect) technique on the Poisson distribution to estimate the effects of these reimbursement programmes on a 17 year long (2000–2016) dataset covering 109 countries where living donor kidney transplants were performed. Results The results indicated that reimbursement programmes have a statistically significant positive effect. Overall, the model predicted that reimbursement programmes increased country-level donation numbers by a factor of 1.12–1.16. Conclusion Reimbursement programmes may be an effective approach to alleviate the kidney shortage worldwide. Further analysis is warranted on the type of reimbursement programmes and the ethical dimension of each type of such programmes.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1838306
- PAR ID:
- 10200514
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- BMJ Global Health
- Volume:
- 5
- Issue:
- 8
- ISSN:
- 2059-7908
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- e002596
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Purpose: The equitable distribution of donor kidneys is crucial to maximizing transplant success rates and addressing disparities in healthcare data. This study examines potential gender bias in the Deceased Donor Organ Allocation Model (DDOA) by using machine learning and AI to analyze its impact on kidney discard decisions to ensure fairness in accordance with medical ethics. Methods: The study employs the Deceased Donor Organ Allocation Model (DDOA) model (https://ddoa.mst.hekademeia.org/#/kidney) to predict the discard probability of deceased donor kidneys using donor characteristic from the OPTN Deceased Donor Dataset (2016-2023). Using the SRTR SAF dictionary, the dataset consists of 18,029 donor records, where gender was assessed for its effect on discard probability. ANOVA and t-test determines whether there is a statistically significant difference between the discard percentages for female and male donors by changing the donor gender data alone. If the p-value obtained from the t-test is less than the significance level (typically 0.05), we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant difference. Otherwise, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Results: Figure 1 visualizes the differences in discard percentages between female and male donor kidneys, with an unbiased allocation system expected to show no difference (i.e., a value of zero). To assess the presence of gender bias, statistical analyses, including t-tests and ANOVA were performed. The t-test comparing female and male kidney discard rates yielded a t-statistic of 29.690228, with a p-value of 3.586956e-189 < 0.05 significance threshold. This result leads to the rejection of the null hypothesis, indicating a significant difference was found between the mean when altering only the donor gender attribute in the DDOA model making it play a significant role in discard decisions. Conclusions: The study highlights that a significant difference was found between the mean by altering only the donor gender attribute, contributing to kidney discard rates in the DDOA model. These findings reinforce the need for greater transparency in organ allocation models and a reconsideration of the demographic criteria used in the evaluation process. Future research should refine algorithms to minimize biases in organ allocation and investigate kidney discard disparities in transplantation.more » « less
-
Food banks are nonprofit hunger relief organizations that collect donations from donors and distribute food to local agencies that serve people in need. Donors consist of local supermarkets, manufacturers, and community organizations. The frequency, quantity, and type of food donated by each donor can vary each month. In this research, we propose a technique to identify the supply behavior of donors and cluster them based on these attributes. We then develop a predictive ensemble model to forecast the contribution of different donor clusters. Our study shows the necessary behavioral attributes to classify donors and the best way to cluster donor data to improve the prediction model.more » « less
-
Diasporas and diaspora non-governmental organisations (NGOs) are increasingly important as resource lifelines to their home countries, yet the resources that they mobilise, the types of challenges that they face, and their coping mechanisms are not well explored or understood in the context of disaster recovery. To fill this knowledge gap, this study employed an inductive qualitative methodological approach, using interviews to comprehend the role played by Haitian diaspora NGOs after the catastrophic earthquake in 2010. It found that resources take four common forms: event fundraisers; financial and material donations from supporters; remittances; and volunteer labour. Challenges include an overreliance on diaspora donors, competition among NGOs, and what is perceived as inequitable funding practices towards diaspora NGOs. The findings provide insights centred on better coordination among diaspora NGOs, as well as between diaspora NGOs and other local and international NGOs and local governments and international institutions, to ensure more efficient delivery of services to survivors.more » « less
-
Purpose: AI models for kidney transplant acceptance must be rigorously evaluated for bias to ensure equitable healthcare access. This study investigates demographic and clinical biases in the Final Acceptance Model (FAM), a donor-recipient matching deep learning model that complements surgeons’ decision-making process in predicting whether to accept available kidneys for their patients with end of stage renal disorder. Methods: AI models for kidney transplant acceptance must be rigorously evaluated for bias to ensure equitable healthcare access. This study investigates demographic and clinical biases in the Final Acceptance Model (FAM), a donor-recipient matching deep learning model that complements surgeons’ decision-making process in predicting whether to accept available kidneys for their patients with end of stage renal disorder. Results: There is no significant racial bias in the model’s predictions (p=1.0), indicating consistent outcome across all racial combinations between donors and recipients. Gender-related effects as shown in Figure 1, while statistically significant (p=0.008), showed minimal practical impact with mean differences below 1% in prediction probabilities. Significant difference Clinical factors involving diabetes and hypertension showed significant difference (p=4.21e-19). The combined presence of diabetes and hypertension in donors showed the largest effect on predictions (mean difference up to -0.0173, p<0.05), followed by diabetes-only conditions in donors (mean difference up to -0.0166, p<0.05). These variations in clinical factor predictions showed bias against groups with comorbidities. Conclusions: The biases observed in the model highlight the need to improve the algorithm to ensure absolute fairness in prediction.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002596
