More Like this

1. Time-Space Trade-offs in Population Protocols

   https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611974782.169  

   Alistarh, Dan ; Aspnes, James ; Eisenstat, David ; Gelashvili, Rati ; Rivest, Ronald L. ( January 2017 , Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms)

   Population protocols are a popular model of distributed computing, in which randomly-interacting agents with little computational power cooperate to jointly perform computational tasks. Inspired by developments in molecular computation, and in particular DNA computing, recent algorithmic work has focused on the complexity of solving simple yet fundamental tasks in the population model, such as leader election (which requires convergence to a single agent in a special “leader” state), and majority (in which agents must converge to a decision as to which of two possible initial states had higher initial count). Known results point towards an inherent trade-off between the time complexity of such algorithms, and the space complexity, i.e. size of the memory available to each agent. In this paper, we explore this trade-off and provide new upper and lower bounds for majority and leader election. First, we prove a unified lower bound, which relates the space available per node with the time complexity achievable by a protocol: for instance, our result implies that any protocol solving either of these tasks for n agents using O(log log n) states must take Ω(n/polylogn) expected time. This is the first result to characterize time complexity for protocols which employ super-constant number ofmore »states per node, and proves that fast, poly-logarithmic running times require protocols to have relatively large space costs. On the positive side, we give algorithms showing that fast, poly-logarithmic convergence time can be achieved using O (log2 n) space per node, in the case of both tasks. Overall, our results highlight a time complexity separation between O (log log n) and Θ(log2 n) state space size for both majority and leader election in population protocols, and introduce new techniques, which should be applicable more broadly.« less
2. Optimal Document Exchange and New Codes for Small Number of Insertions and Deletions

   Haeupler, Bernhard ( October 2019 , IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science)

   We give the first communication-optimal document exchange protocol. For any n and kmore »and deletions. These (binary) codes correct any δ fraction of adversarial insertions/deletions while having a rate of 1−O(δ log^2 1/δ) and improve over the codes of Guruswami and Li and Haeupler, Shahrasbi and Vitercik which have rate 1−Θ(√δ log^(O(1)) 1/δ).« less
3. Time and Space Optimal Counting in Population Protocols

   https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2016.13  

   Aspnes, James ; Beauquier, Joffroy ; Burman, Janna ; Sohier, Devan ( January 2016 , Leibniz international proceedings in informatics)

   This work concerns the general issue of combined optimality in terms of time and space complexity. In this context, we study the problem of counting resource-limited and passively mobile nodes in the model of population protocols, in which the space complexity is crucial. The counted nodes are memory-limited anonymous devices (called agents) communicating asynchronously in pairs (according to a fairness condition). Moreover, we assume that these agents are prone to failures so that they cannot be correctly initialized. This study considers two classical fairness conditions, and for each we investigate the issue of time optimality of (exact) counting given optimal space. First, with randomly interacting agents (probabilistic fairness), we present a ``non-guessing'' time optimal protocol of O(n log n) expected interactions given an optimal space of only one bit (for a population of size n). We prove the time optimality of such protocol. Then, under weak fairness (where every pair of agents interacts infinitely often), we show that a space optimal (semi-uniform) solution cannot converge faster than in Ω(2n) time, in terms of non-null transitions (i.e, the transitions that affect the states of the interacting agents). This result together with the time complexity analysis of an already known space optimalmore »protocol shows that it is also optimal in time (given the optimal space constraints).« less
4. Dynamic size counting in population protocols

   David Doty and Mahsa Eftekhari ( January 2022 , SAND 2022: 1st Symposium on Algorithmic Foundations of Dynamic Networks)

   James Aspnes and Othon Michail (Ed.)

   The population protocol model describes a network of anonymous agents that interact asynchronously in pairs chosen at random. Each agent starts in the same initial state s. We introduce the *dynamic size counting* problem: approximately counting the number of agents in the presence of an adversary who at any time can remove any number of agents or add any number of new agents in state s. A valid solution requires that after each addition/removal event, resulting in population size n, with high probability each agent "quickly" computes the same constant-factor estimate of the value log2n (how quickly is called the *convergence* time), which remains the output of every agent for as long as possible (the *holding* time). Since the adversary can remove agents, the holding time is necessarily finite: even after the adversary stops altering the population, it is impossible to *stabilize* to an output that never again changes. We first show that a protocol solves the dynamic size counting problem if and only if it solves the *loosely-stabilizing counting* problem: that of estimating logn in a *fixed-size* population, but where the adversary can initialize each agent in an arbitrary state, with the same convergence time and holding time. Wemore »then show a protocol solving the loosely-stabilizing counting problem with the following guarantees: if the population size is n, M is the largest initial estimate of logn, and s is the maximum integer initially stored in any field of the agents' memory, we have expected convergence time O(logn+logM), expected polynomial holding time, and expected memory usage of O(log2(s)+(loglogn)2) bits. Interpreted as a dynamic size counting protocol, when changing from population size nprev to nnext, the convergence time is O(lognnext+loglognprev).« less
5. Optimal Coding Theorems in Time-Bounded Kolmogorov Complexity

   Lu, Zhenjian ; Oliveira, Igor C. ; Zimand, Marius ( January 2022 , 49th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2022))

   Mikołaj Bojańczyk and Emanuela Merelli and David P. Woodruff (Ed.)

   The classical coding theorem in Kolmogorov complexity states that if an n-bit string x is sampled with probability δ by an algorithm with prefix-free domain then K(x) ≤ log(1/δ) + O(1). In a recent work, Lu and Oliveira [31] established an unconditional time-bounded version of this result, by showing that if x can be efficiently sampled with probability δ then rKt(x) = O(log(1/δ)) + O(log n), where rKt denotes the randomized analogue of Levin’s Kt complexity. Unfortunately, this result is often insufficient when transferring applications of the classical coding theorem to the time-bounded setting, as it achieves a O(log(1/δ)) bound instead of the information-theoretic optimal log(1/δ). Motivated by this discrepancy, we investigate optimal coding theorems in the time-bounded setting. Our main contributions can be summarised as follows. • Efficient coding theorem for rKt with a factor of 2. Addressing a question from [31], we show that if x can be efficiently sampled with probability at least δ then rKt(x) ≤ (2 + o(1)) · log(1/δ) +O(log n). As in previous work, our coding theorem is efficient in the sense that it provides a polynomial-time probabilistic algorithm that, when given x, the code of the sampler, and δ, it outputs, withmore »probability ≥ 0.99, a probabilistic representation of x that certifies this rKt complexity bound. • Optimality under a cryptographic assumption. Under a hypothesis about the security of cryptographic pseudorandom generators, we show that no efficient coding theorem can achieve a bound of the form rKt(x) ≤ (2 − o(1)) · log(1/δ) + poly(log n). Under a weaker assumption, we exhibit a gap between efficient coding theorems and existential coding theorems with near-optimal parameters. • Optimal coding theorem for pKt and unconditional Antunes-Fortnow. We consider pKt complexity [17], a variant of rKt where the randomness is public and the time bound is fixed. We observe the existence of an optimal coding theorem for pKt, and employ this result to establish an unconditional version of a theorem of Antunes and Fortnow [5] which characterizes the worst-case running times of languages that are in average polynomial-time over all P-samplable distributions.« less