More Like this

1. Nonparametric Adaptive Robust Control under Model Uncertainty

   https://doi.org/10.1137/22M1481609  

   Bayraktar, Erhan; Chen, Tao (October 2023, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization)

   Yin, George (Ed.)

   We consider a discrete time stochastic Markovian control problem under model uncertainty. Such uncertainty not only comes from the fact that the true probability law of the underlying stochastic process is unknown, but the parametric family of probability distributions which the true law belongs to is also unknown. We propose a nonparametric adaptive robust control methodology to deal with such problem where the relevant system random noise is, for simplicity, assumed to be i.i.d. and onedimensional. Our approach hinges on the following building concepts: first, using the adaptive robust paradigm to incorporate online learning and uncertainty reduction into the robust control problem; second, learning the unknown probability law through the empirical distribution, and representing uncertainty reduction in terms of a sequence of Wasserstein balls around the empirical distribution; third, using Lagrangian duality to convert the optimization over Wasserstein balls to a scalar optimization problem, and adopting a machine learning technique to achieve efficient computation of the optimal control. We illustrate our methodology by considering a utility maximization problem. Numerical comparisons show that the nonparametric adaptive robust control approach is preferable to the traditional robust frameworks 

   more » « less
2. Hyperparameter Estimation in Bayesian MAP Estimation: Parameterizations and Consistency

   https://doi.org/10.5802/smai-jcm.62  

   Dunlop, Matthew M.; Helin, Tapio; Stuart, Andrew M. (April 2020, The SMAI journal of computational mathematics)

   null (Ed.)

   The Bayesian formulation of inverse problems is attractive for three primary reasons: it provides a clear modelling framework; it allows for principled learning of hyperparameters; and it can provide uncertainty quantification. The posterior distribution may in principle be sampled by means of MCMC or SMC methods, but for many problems it is computationally infeasible to do so. In this situation maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimators are often sought. Whilst these are relatively cheap to compute, and have an attractive variational formulation, a key drawback is their lack of invariance under change of parameterization; it is important to study MAP estimators, however, because they provide a link with classical optimization approaches to inverse problems and the Bayesian link may be used to improve upon classical optimization approaches. The lack of invariance of MAP estimators under change of parameterization is a particularly significant issue when hierarchical priors are employed to learn hyperparameters. In this paper we study the effect of the choice of parameterization on MAP estimators when a conditionally Gaussian hierarchical prior distribution is employed. Specifically we consider the centred parameterization, the natural parameterization in which the unknown state is solved for directly, and the noncentred parameterization, which works with a whitened Gaussian as the unknown state variable, and arises naturally when considering dimension-robust MCMC algorithms; MAP estimation is well-defined in the nonparametric setting only for the noncentred parameterization. However, we show that MAP estimates based on the noncentred parameterization are not consistent as estimators of hyperparameters; conversely, we show that limits of finite-dimensional centred MAP estimators are consistent as the dimension tends to infinity. We also consider empirical Bayesian hyperparameter estimation, show consistency of these estimates, and demonstrate that they are more robust with respect to noise than centred MAP estimates. An underpinning concept throughout is that hyperparameters may only be recovered up to measure equivalence, a well-known phenomenon in the context of the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process. The applicability of the results is demonstrated concretely with the study of hierarchical Whittle–Matérn and ARD priors. 

   more » « less
3. Sequential Domain Adaptation by Synthesizing Distributionally Robust Experts

   Taskesen, Bahar; Yue, Man-Chung; Blanchet, Jose; Kuhn, Daniel; Nguyen, Viet Anh (January 2021, Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning)

   Meila, Marina and (Ed.)

   Least squares estimators, when trained on a few target domain samples, may predict poorly. Supervised domain adaptation aims to improve the predictive accuracy by exploiting additional labeled training samples from a source distribution that is close to the target distribution. Given available data, we investigate novel strategies to synthesize a family of least squares estimator experts that are robust with regard to moment conditions. When these moment conditions are specified using Kullback-Leibler or Wasserstein-type divergences, we can find the robust estimators efficiently using convex optimization. We use the Bernstein online aggregation algorithm on the proposed family of robust experts to generate predictions for the sequential stream of target test samples. Numerical experiments on real data show that the robust strategies systematically outperform non-robust interpolations of the empirical least squares estimators. 

   more » « less
4. Robust Wasserstein profile inference and applications to machine learning

   https://doi.org/10.1017/jpr.2019.49  

   Blanchet, Jose; Kang, Yang; Murthy, Karthyek (September 2019, Journal of Applied Probability)

   Abstract We show that several machine learning estimators, including square-root least absolute shrinkage and selection and regularized logistic regression, can be represented as solutions to distributionally robust optimization problems. The associated uncertainty regions are based on suitably defined Wasserstein distances. Hence, our representations allow us to view regularization as a result of introducing an artificial adversary that perturbs the empirical distribution to account for out-of-sample effects in loss estimation. In addition, we introduce RWPI (robust Wasserstein profile inference), a novel inference methodology which extends the use of methods inspired by empirical likelihood to the setting of optimal transport costs (of which Wasserstein distances are a particular case). We use RWPI to show how to optimally select the size of uncertainty regions, and as a consequence we are able to choose regularization parameters for these machine learning estimators without the use of cross validation. Numerical experiments are also given to validate our theoretical findings. 

   more » « less
5. Statistics of Robust Optimization: A Generalized Empirical Likelihood Approach

   https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2020.1085  

   Duchi, John C.; Glynn, Peter W.; Namkoong, Hongseok (August 2021, Mathematics of Operations Research)

   We study statistical inference and distributionally robust solution methods for stochastic optimization problems, focusing on confidence intervals for optimal values and solutions that achieve exact coverage asymptotically. We develop a generalized empirical likelihood framework—based on distributional uncertainty sets constructed from nonparametric f-divergence balls—for Hadamard differentiable functionals, and in particular, stochastic optimization problems. As consequences of this theory, we provide a principled method for choosing the size of distributional uncertainty regions to provide one- and two-sided confidence intervals that achieve exact coverage. We also give an asymptotic expansion for our distributionally robust formulation, showing how robustification regularizes problems by their variance. Finally, we show that optimizers of the distributionally robust formulations we study enjoy (essentially) the same consistency properties as those in classical sample average approximations. Our general approach applies to quickly mixing stationary sequences, including geometrically ergodic Harris recurrent Markov chains. 

   more » « less