From birth to 5 years of age, brain structure matures and evolves alongside emerging cognitive and behavioral abilities. In relating concurrent cognitive functioning and measures of brain structure, a major challenge that has impeded prior investigation of their time‐dynamic relationships is the sparse and irregular nature of most longitudinal neuroimaging data. We demonstrate how this problem can be addressed by applying functional concurrent regression models (FCRMs) to longitudinal cognitive and neuroimaging data. The application of FCRM in neuroimaging is illustrated with longitudinal neuroimaging and cognitive data acquired from a large cohort (
- Award ID(s):
- 1631550
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10216336
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Communications Biology
- Volume:
- 3
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 2399-3642
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
Abstract n = 210) of healthy children, 2–48 months of age. Quantifying white matter myelination by using myelin water fraction (MWF) as imaging metric derived from MRI scans, application of this methodology reveals an early period (200–500 days) during which whole brain and regional white matter structure, as quantified by MWF, is positively associated with cognitive ability, while we found no such association for whole brain white matter volume. Adjusting for baseline covariates including socioeconomic status as measured by maternal education (SES‐ME), infant feeding practice, gender, and birth weight further reveals an increasing association between SES‐ME and cognitive development with child age. These results shed new light on the emerging patterns of brain and cognitive development, indicating that FCRM provides a useful tool for investigating these evolving relationships. -
Patterns of estimated neural activity derived from resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) have been shown to predict a wide range of cognitive and behavioral outcomes in both normative and clinical populations. Yet, without links to established cognitive processes, the functional brain states associated with the resting brain will remain unexplained, and potentially confounded, markers of individual differences. In this work we demonstrate the application of multivoxel pattern classifiers (MVPCs) to predict the valence and arousal properties of spontaneous affect processing in the task-non-engaged resting state. rs-fMRI data were acquired from subjects that were held out from a subject set that underwent image-based affect induction concurrent with fMRI to train the MVPCs. We also validated these affective predictions against a well-established, independent measure of autonomic arousal, skin conductance response. These findings suggest a new neuroimaging methodology for resting state analysis in which models, trained on cognition-specific task-based fMRI acquired from well-matched cohorts, capably predict hidden cognitive processes operating within the resting brain.more » « less
-
Abstract Introduction Working memory is a critical cognitive ability that affects our daily functioning and relates to many cognitive processes and clinical conditions. Episodic memory is vital because it enables individuals to form and maintain their self‐identities. Our study analyzes the extent to which whole‐brain functional connectivity observed during completion of an
N ‐back memory task, a common measure of working memory, can predict both working memory and episodic memory.Methods We used connectome‐based predictive models (CPMs) to predict 502 Human Connectome Project (HCP) participants' in‐scanner 2‐back memory test scores and out‐of‐scanner working memory test (List Sorting) and episodic memory test (Picture Sequence and Penn Word) scores based on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data collected both during rest and
N ‐back task performance. We also analyzed the functional brain connections that contributed to prediction for each of these models.Results Functional connectivity observed during
N ‐back task performance predicted out‐of‐scanner List Sorting scores and to a lesser extent out‐of‐scanner Picture Sequence scores, but did not predict out‐of‐scanner Penn Word scores. Additionally, the functional connections predicting 2‐back scores overlapped to a greater degree with those predicting List Sorting scores than with those predicting Picture Sequence or Penn Word scores. Functional connections with the insula, including connections between insular and parietal regions, predicted scores across the 2‐back, List Sorting, and Picture Sequence tasks.Conclusions Our findings validate functional connectivity observed during the
N ‐back task as a measure of working memory, which generalizes to predict episodic memory to a lesser extent. By building on our understanding of the predictive power ofN ‐back task functional connectivity, this work enhances our knowledge of relationships between working memory and episodic memory. -
Abstract A critical goal of cognitive neuroscience is to predict behavior from neural structure and function, thereby providing crucial insights into who might benefit from clinical and/or educational interventions. Across development, the strength of functional connectivity among a distributed set of brain regions is associated with children’s math skills. Therefore, in the present study we use connectome-based predictive modeling to investigate whether functional connectivity during numerical processing and at rest “predicts” children’s math skills (N = 31, Mage = 9.21 years, 14 Female). Overall, we found that functional connectivity during symbolic number comparison and rest, but not during nonsymbolic number comparison, predicts children’s math skills. Each task revealed a largely distinct set of predictive connections distributed across canonical brain networks and major brain lobes. Most of these predictive connections were negatively correlated with children’s math skills so that weaker connectivity predicted better math skills. Notably, these predictive connections were largely nonoverlapping across task states, suggesting children’s math abilities may depend on state-dependent patterns of network segregation and/or regional specialization. Furthermore, the current predictive modeling approach moves beyond brain–behavior correlations and toward building models of brain connectivity that may eventually aid in predicting future math skills.more » « less
-
Executive function is a quintessential human capacity that emerges late in development and displays different developmental trends in males and females. Sex differences in executive function in youth have been linked to vulnerability to psychopathology as well as to behaviors that impinge on health, wellbeing, and longevity. Yet, the neurobiological basis of these differences is not well understood, in part due to the spatiotemporal complexity inherent in patterns of brain network maturation supporting executive function. Here we test the hypothesis that sex differences in impulsivity in youth stem from sex differences in the controllability of structural brain networks as they rewire over development. Combining methods from network neuroscience and network control theory, we characterize the network control properties of structural brain networks estimated from diffusion imaging data acquired in males and females in a sample of 879 youth aged 8–22 years. We summarize the control properties of these networks by estimating average and modal controllability, two statistics that probe the ease with which brain areas can drive the network towards easy versus difficult-to-reach states. We find that females have higher modal controllability in frontal, parietal, and subcortical regions while males have higher average controllability in frontal and subcortical regions. Furthermore, controllability profiles in males are negatively related to the false positive rate on a continuous performance task, a common measure of impulsivity. Finally, we find associations between average controllability and individual differences in activation during an n-back working memory task. Taken together, our findings support the notion that sex differences in the controllability of structural brain networks can partially explain sex differences in executive function. Controllability of structural brain networks also predicts features of task-relevant activation, suggesting the potential for controllability to represent context- specific constraints on network state more generally.more » « less