Base‐editing technologies enable the introduction of point mutations at targeted genomic sites in mammalian cells, with higher efficiency and precision than traditional genome‐editing methods that use DNA double‐strand breaks, such as zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription‐activator‐like effector nucleases (TALENs), and the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)–CRISPR‐associated protein 9 (CRISPR‐Cas9) system. This allows the generation of single‐nucleotide‐variant isogenic cell lines (i.e., cell lines whose genomic sequences differ from each other only at a single, edited nucleotide) in a more time‐ and resource‐effective manner. These single‐nucleotide‐variant clonal cell lines represent a powerful tool with which to assess the functional role of genetic variants in a native cellular context. Base editing can therefore facilitate genotype‐to‐phenotype studies in a controlled laboratory setting, with applications in both basic research and clinical applications. Here, we provide optimized protocols (including experimental design, methods, and analyses) to design base‐editing constructs, transfect adherent cells, quantify base‐editing efficiencies in bulk, and generate single‐nucleotide‐variant clonal cell lines. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Genome editing technologies have revolutionized genetic studies in the life sciences community in recent years. The application of these technologies allows researchers to conveniently generate mutations in almost any gene of interest. This is very useful for species such as maize that have complex genomes and lack comprehensive mutant collections. With the improvement of genome editing tools and transformation methods, these technologies are also widely used to assist breeding research and implementation in maize. However, the detection and genotyping of genomic edits rely on low‐throughput, high‐cost methods, such as traditional agarose gel electrophoresis and Sanger sequencing. This article describes a method to barcode the target regions of genomic edits from many individuals by low‐cost polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification. It also employs next‐generation sequencing (NGS) to genotype the genome‐edited plants at high throughput and low cost. This protocol can be used for initial screening of genomic edits as well as derived population genotyping on a small or large scale, at high efficiency and low cost. © 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10220825
- Publisher / Repository:
- Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Current Protocols
- Volume:
- 1
- Issue:
- 4
- ISSN:
- 2691-1299
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
more » « less
Abstract Basic Protocol 1 : Design and production of plasmids for base‐editing experimentsBasic Protocol 2 : Transfection of adherent cells and harvesting of genomic DNABasic Protocol 3 : Genotyping of harvested cells using Sanger sequencingAlternate Protocol 1 : Next‐generation sequencing to quantify base editingBasic Protocol 4 : Single‐cell isolation of base‐edited cells using FACSAlternate Protocol 2 : Single‐cell isolation of base‐edited cells using dilution platingBasic Protocol 5 : Clonal expansion to generate isogenic cell lines and genotyping of clones -
more » « less
Abstract Until recently, precise genome editing has been limited to a few organisms. The ability of Cas9 to generate double stranded DNA breaks at specific genomic sites has greatly expanded molecular toolkits in many organisms and cell types. Before CRISPR‐Cas9 mediated genome editing,
P. patens was unique among plants in its ability to integrate DNA via homologous recombination. However, selection for homologous recombination events was required to obtain edited plants, limiting the types of editing that were possible. Now with CRISPR‐Cas9, molecular manipulations inP. patens have greatly expanded. This protocol describes a method to generate a variety of different genome edits. The protocol describes a streamlined method to generate the Cas9/sgRNA expression constructs, design homology templates, transform, and quickly genotype plants. © 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.Basic Protocol 1 : Constructing the Cas9/sgRNA transient expression vectorAlternate Protocol 1 : Shortcut to generating single and pooled Cas9/sgRNA expression vectorsBasic Protocol 2 : Designing the oligonucleotide‐based homology‐directed repair (HDR) templateAlternate Protocol 2 : Designing the plasmid‐based HDR templateBasic Protocol 3 : Inducing genome editing by transforming CRISPR vector intoP. patens protoplastsBasic Protocol 4 : Identifying edited plants. -
more » « less
Abstract Forward genetics is used to identify the genetic basis for a phenotype. The approach involves identifying a mutant organism exhibiting a phenotype of interest and then mapping the causative locus or gene. Bulked‐segregant analysis (BSA) is a quick and effective approach to map mutants using pools of mutants and wild‐type plants from a segregating population to identify linkage of the mutant phenotype, and this approach has been successfully used in plants. Traditional linkage mapping approaches are outdated and time intensive, and can be very difficult. With the highly evolved development and reduction in cost of high‐throughput sequencing, this new approach combined with BSA has become extremely effective in multiple plant species, including
Zea mays (maize). While the approach is incredibly powerful, careful experimental design, bioinformatic mapping techniques, and interpretation of results are important to obtain the desired results in an effective and timely manner. Poor design of a mapping population, limitations in bioinformatic experience, and inadequate understanding of sequence data are limitations of these approaches for the researcher. Here, we describe a straightforward protocol for mapping mutations responsible for a phenotype of interest in maize, using high‐throughput sequencing and BSA. Specifically, we discuss relevant aspects of developing a mutant mapping population. This is followed by a detailed protocol for DNA preparation and analysis of short‐read sequences to map and identify candidate causative mutations responsible for the mutant phenotype of interest. We provide command‐line and perl scripts to complete the bioinformatic analysis of the mutant sequence data. This protocol lays out the design of the BSA, bioinformatic approaches, and interpreting the sequencing data. These methods are very adaptable to any forward genetics experiment and provide a step‐by‐step approach to identifying the genetic basis of a maize mutant phenotype. © 2022 The Authors. Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.Basic Protocol : Bulked‐segregant analysis and high‐throughput sequencing to map maize mutants -
more » « less
Abstract The development of next-generation sequencing (NGS) enabled a shift from array-based genotyping to directly sequencing genomic libraries for high-throughput genotyping. Even though whole-genome sequencing was initially too costly for routine analysis in large populations such as breeding or genetic studies, continued advancements in genome sequencing and bioinformatics have provided the opportunity to capitalize on whole-genome information. As new sequencing platforms can routinely provide high-quality sequencing data for sufficient genome coverage to genotype various breeding populations, a limitation comes in the time and cost of library construction when multiplexing a large number of samples. Here we describe a high-throughput whole-genome skim-sequencing (skim-seq) approach that can be utilized for a broad range of genotyping and genomic characterization. Using optimized low-volume Illumina Nextera chemistry, we developed a skim-seq method and combined up to 960 samples in one multiplex library using dual index barcoding. With the dual-index barcoding, the number of samples for multiplexing can be adjusted depending on the amount of data required, and could be extended to 3,072 samples or more. Panels of doubled haploid wheat lines (
Triticum aestivum , CDC Stanley x CDC Landmark), wheat-barley (T .aestivum xHordeum vulgare ) and wheat-wheatgrass (Triticum durum x Thinopyrum intermedium ) introgression lines as well as known monosomic wheat stocks were genotyped using the skim-seq approach. Bioinformatics pipelines were developed for various applications where sequencing coverage ranged from 1 × down to 0.01 × per sample. Using reference genomes, we detected chromosome dosage, identified aneuploidy, and karyotyped introgression lines from the skim-seq data. Leveraging the recent advancements in genome sequencing, skim-seq provides an effective and low-cost tool for routine genotyping and genetic analysis, which can track and identify introgressions and genomic regions of interest in genetics research and applied breeding programs. -
more » « less
Abstract CRISPR‐Cas9‐based technologies have revolutionized experimental manipulation of mammalian genomes. However, limitations regarding the delivery and efficacy of these technologies restrict their application in primary cells. This article describes a protocol for penetrant, reproducible, and fast CRISPR‐Cas9 genome editing in cell cultures derived from primary cells. The protocol employs transient nucleofection of ribonucleoprotein complexes composed of chemically synthesized 2′‐
O ‐methyl‐3′phosphorothioate‐modified single guide RNAs (sgRNAs) and purified Cas9 protein. It can be used both for targeted insertion‐deletion mutation (indel) formation at up to >90% efficiency (via use of a single sgRNA) and for targeted deletion of genomic regions (via combined use of multiple sgRNAs). This article provides examples of the nucleofection buffer and programs that are optimal for patient‐derived glioblastoma (GBM) stem‐like cells (GSCs) and human neural stem/progenitor cells (NSCs), but the protocol can be readily applied to other primary cell cultures by modifying the nucleofection conditions. In summary, this is a relatively simple method that can be used for highly efficient and fast gene knockout, as well as for targeted genomic deletions, even in hyperdiploid cells such as many cancer stem‐like cells. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLCBasic Protocol : Cas9:sgRNA ribonucleoprotein nucleofection for insertion‐deletion (indel) mutation and genomic deletion generation in primary cell cultures
