skip to main content

Title: Roadmap on emerging concepts in the physical biology of bacterial biofilms: from surface sensing to community formation
Bacterial biofilms are communities of bacteria that exist as aggregates that can adhere to surfaces or be free-standing. This complex, social mode of cellular organization is fundamental to the physiology of microbes and often exhibits surprising behaviour. Bacterial biofilms are more than the sum of their parts: Single cell behaviour has a complex relation to collective community behaviour, in a manner perhaps cognate to the complex relation between atomic physics and condensed matter physics. Biofilm microbiology is a relatively young field by biology standards, but it has already attracted intense attention from physicists. Sometimes, this attention takes the form of seeing biofilms as inspiration for new physics. In this roadmap, we highlight the work of those who have taken the opposite strategy: We highlight work of physicists and physical scientists who use physics to engage fundamental concepts in bacterial biofilm microbiology, including adhesion, sensing, motility, signalling, memory, energy flow, community formation and cooperativity. These contributions are juxtaposed with microbiologists who have made recent important discoveries on bacterial biofilms using state-of-the-art physical methods. The contributions to this roadmap exemplify how well physics and biology can be combined to achieve a new synthesis, rather than just a division of labour.
Authors:
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; more » ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; « less
Editors:
Wong, Gerard C
Award ID(s):
2038000 1749662 1808332
Publication Date:
NSF-PAR ID:
10228476
Journal Name:
Physical Biology
ISSN:
1478-3967
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. DeAngelis, Kristen M. (Ed.)
    ABSTRACT Microbial interactions are often mediated by diffusible small molecules, including secondary metabolites, that play roles in cell-to-cell signaling and inhibition of competitors. Biofilms are often “hot spots” for high concentrations of bacteria and their secondary metabolites, which make them ideal systems for the study of small-molecule contributions to microbial interactions. Here, we use a five-member synthetic community consisting of Roseobacteraceae representatives to investigate the role of secondary metabolites on microbial biofilm dynamics. One synthetic community member, Rhodobacterales strain Y4I, possesses two acylated homoserine lactone (AHL)-based cell-to-cell signaling systems ( pgaRI and phaRI ) as well as a nonribosomal peptide synthase gene ( igi ) cluster that encodes the antimicrobial indigoidine. Through serial substitution of Y4I with mutants deficient in single signaling molecule pathways, the contribution of these small-molecule systems could be assessed. As secondary metabolite production is dependent upon central metabolites, the influence of growth substrate (i.e., complex medium versus defined medium with a single carbon substrate) on these dynamics was also considered. Depending on the Y4I mutant genotype included, community dynamics ranged from competitive to cooperative. The observed interactions were mostly competitive in nature. However, the community harboring a Y4I variant that was both impaired in quorum sensingmore »(QS) pathways and unable to produce indigoidine ( pgaR variant) shifted toward more cooperative interactions over time. These cooperative interactions were enhanced in the defined growth medium. The results presented provide a framework for deciphering complex, small-molecule-mediated interactions that have broad application to microbial biology. IMPORTANCE Microbial biofilms play critical roles in marine ecosystems and are hot spots for microbial interactions that play a role in the development and function of these communities. Roseobacteraceae are an abundant and active family of marine heterotrophic bacteria forming close associations with phytoplankton and carrying out key transformations in biogeochemical cycles. Group members are aggressive primary colonizers of surfaces, where they set the stage for the development of multispecies biofilm communities. Few studies have examined the impact of secondary metabolites, such as cell-to-cell signaling and antimicrobial production, on marine microbial biofilm community structure. Here, we assessed the impact of secondary metabolites on microbial interactions using a synthetic, five-member Roseobacteraceae community by measuring species composition and biomass production during biofilm growth. We present evidence that secondary metabolites influence social behaviors within these multispecies microbial biofilms, thereby improving understanding of bacterial secondary metabolite production influence on social behaviors within marine microbial biofilm communities.« less
  2. Engineers have long studied how mechanical instabilities cause patterns to form in inanimate materials, and recently more attention has been given to how such forces affect biological systems. For example, stresses can build up within a tissue if one layer grows faster than an adjacent layer. The tissue can release this stress by wrinkling, folding or creasing. Though ancient and single-celled, bacteria can also develop spectacular patterns when they exist in the lifestyle known as a biofilm: a community of cells adhered to a surface. But do mechanical instabilities drive the patterns seen in biofilms? To investigate, Yan, Fei, Mao et al. grew biofilms of the bacterium called Vibrio cholerae – which causes the disease cholera – on solid, non-growing ‘substrates’. This work revealed that as the biofilms grow, their expansion is constrained by the substrate, and this situation generates mechanical stresses. To release the stresses, the biofilm initially folds to form wrinkles. Later, as the biofilm expands further, small parts of it detach from the substrate to form blisters. The same forces that keep water droplets spherical (known as interfacial forces) dictate how the blisters evolve, interact, and eventually shape the expanding biofilm. Using these principles, Yan et al.more »could engineer the biofilm into desired shapes. Collectively, the results presented by Yan et al. connect the shape of the biofilm surface with its material properties, in particular its stiffness. Understanding this relationship could help researchers to develop new ways to remove harmful biofilms, such as those that cause disease or that damage underwater structures. The stiffness of biofilms is already known to affect how well bacteria can resist antibiotics. Future studies could look for new genes or compounds that change the material properties of a biofilm, thereby altering the biofilm surface.« less
  3. ABSTRACT Bacteria form complex multicellular structures on solid surfaces known as biofilms, which allow them to survive in harsh environments. A hallmark characteristic of mature biofilms is the high-level antibiotic tolerance (up to 1,000 times) compared with that of planktonic cells. Here, we report our new findings that biofilm cells are not always more tolerant to antibiotics than planktonic cells in the same culture. Specifically, Escherichia coli RP437 exhibited a dynamic change in antibiotic susceptibility during its early-stage biofilm formation. This phenomenon was not strain specific. Upon initial attachment, surface-associated cells became more sensitive to antibiotics than planktonic cells. By controlling the cell adhesion and cluster size using patterned E. coli biofilms, cells involved in the interaction between cell clusters during microcolony formation were found to be more susceptible to ampicillin than cells within clusters, suggesting a role of cell-cell interactions in biofilm-associated antibiotic tolerance. After this stage, biofilm cells became less susceptible to ampicillin and ofloxacin than planktonic cells. However, when the cells were detached by sonication, both antibiotics were more effective in killing the detached biofilm cells than the planktonic cells. Collectively, these results indicate that biofilm formation involves active cellular activities in adaption to the attached lifemore »form and interactions between cell clusters to build the complex structure of a biofilm, which can render these cells more susceptible to antibiotics. These findings shed new light on bacterial antibiotic susceptibility during biofilm formation and can guide the design of better antifouling surfaces, e.g., those with micron-scale topographic structures to interrupt cell-cell interactions. IMPORTANCE Mature biofilms are known for their high-level tolerance to antibiotics; however, antibiotic susceptibility of sessile cells during early-stage biofilm formation is not well understood. In this study, we aim to fill this knowledge gap by following bacterial antibiotic susceptibility during early-stage biofilm formation. We found that the attached cells have a dynamic change in antibiotic susceptibility, and during certain phases, they can be more sensitive to antibiotics than planktonic counterparts in the same culture. Using surface chemistry-controlled patterned biofilm formation, cell-surface and cell-cell interactions were found to affect the antibiotic susceptibility of attached cells. Collectively, these findings provide new insights into biofilm physiology and reveal how adaptation to the attached life form may influence antibiotic susceptibility of bacterial cells.« less
  4. INTRODUCTION: Orthopedic implants are important therapeutic devices for the management of a wide range of orthopedic conditions. However, bacterial infections of orthopedic implants remain a major problem, and not an uncommon one, leading to an increased rate of osteomyelitis, sepsis, implant failure and dysfunction, etc. Treating these infections is more challenging as the causative organism protects itself by the production of a biofilm over the implant’s surface (1). Infections start by the adhesion and colonization of pathogenic bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus (SA), Staphylococcus epidermidis (SE), Escherichia coli (E. coli), Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and Multi-Drug Resistant Escherichia coli (MDR E. coli) on the implant’s surfaces. Specifically, Staphylococcus comprises up to two-thirds of all pathogens involved in orthopedic implant infections (2). However, bacterial surface adhesion is a complex process influenced by several factors such as chemical composition, hydrophobicity, magnetization, surface charge, and surface roughness of the implant (3). Considering the intimate association between bacteria and the implant surface, we measured the effect of stainless-steel surface properties on bacterial surface attachment and subsequent formation of biofilms controlling above mentioned factors. METHODS: The prominent bacteria responsible for orthopedic implant infections (SA, SE, E. coli, MRSA, and MDR E. coli) were used inmore »this study. We were able to control the grain size of medical grade 304 and 316L stainless steel without altering their chemical composition (grain size range= 20μm-200nm) (4). Grain size control affected the nano-topography of the material surfaces which was measured by an Atomic Force Microscope (AFM). Grain sizes, such as 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 9, and 10 μm, were used both polished and non-polished. All the stainless-steel samples were cleaned by treating with acetone and ethanol under sonication. Triplicates of all polished and non-polished samples with different grain sizes were subjected to magnetization of DM, 0.1T, 0.5T, and 1T, before seeding them with the bacteria. Controls were used in the form of untreated samples. Bacterial were grown in Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB). An actively growing bacterial suspension was seeded onto the stainless-steel discs into 24-well micro-titer plates and kept for incubation. After 24 hours of incubation, the stainless-steel discs were washed with Phosphate Buffer Saline (PBS) to remove the plankton bacteria and allow the sessile bacteria in the biofilm to remain. The degree of development of the bacterial biofilms on the stainless-steel discs were measured using spectrophotometric analysis. For this, the bacterial biofilm was removed from the stainless steel by sonication. The formation of biofilms was also determined by performing a biofilm staining method using Safranin. RESULTS SECTION: AFM results revealed a slight decrease in roughness by decreasing the grain size of the material. Moreover, the samples were segregated into two categories of polished and non-polished samples, in which polishing decreased roughness significantly. After careful analysis we found out that polished surfaces showed a higher degree for biofilm formation in comparison to the non-polished ones. We also observed that bacteria showed a higher rate for biofilm formation for the demagnetized samples, whereas 0.5T magnetization showed the least amount of biofilm formation. After 0.5T, there was no significant change in the rate of biofilm formation on the stainless-steel samples. Altogether, stainless steel samples containing 0.5 μm and less grainsize, and magnetized with 0.5 tesla and stronger magnets demonstrated the least degree of biofilm formation. DISCUSSION: In summary, the results demonstrate that controlling the grain size of medical grade stainless steel can control and mitigate bacterial responses on, and thus possibly infections of, orthopedic implants or other implantable devices. The research was funded by Komatsuseiki Kosakusho Co., Ltd (KSJ: Japan) SIGNIFICANCE/CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Orthopedic implants that more than 70% of them are made of metals (i.e., stainless steel, titanium, and cobalt-chromium alloys) are failing through loosening and breakage due to their limited mechanical properties. On the other hand, the risk of infection for these implants and its financial burden on our society is undeniable. We have seen that our uniformly nanograined stainless steel shows improved mechanical properties (i.e., higher stiffness, hardness, fatigue) as compared to conventional stainless steel along with the reduction of biofilm formation on its surface. These promising results made us to peruse the development of nanograined titanium and cobalt-chromium alloys for resolving the complications of orthopedic implants.« less
  5. Microscopic organisms known as bacteria are found in virtually every environment on the planet. One reason bacteria are so successful is that they are able to form communities known as biofilms on surfaces in animals and other living things, as well as on rocks and other features in the environment. These biofilms protect the bacteria from fluctuations in the environment and toxins. For over 30 years, a class of enzymes called the GGDEF enzymes were thought to make a single signal known as cyclic di-GMP that regulates the formation of biofilms. However, in 2016, a team of researchers reported that some GGDEF enzymes, including one from a bacterium called Geobacter sulfurreducens, were also able to produce two other signals known as cGAMP and cyclic di-AMP. The experiments involved making the enzymes and testing their activity outside the cell. Therefore, it remained unclear whether these enzymes (dubbed ‘Hypr’ GGDEF enzymes) actually produce all three signals inside cells and play a role in forming bacterial biofilms. G. sulfurreducens is unusual because it is able to grow on metallic minerals or electrodes to generate electrical energy. As part of a community of microorganisms, they help break down pollutants in contaminated areas and canmore »generate electricity from wastewater. Now, Hallberg, Chan et al. – including many of the researchers involved in the 2016 work – combined several experimental and mathematical approaches to study the Hypr GGDEF enzymes in G. sulfurreducens. The experiments show that the Hypr GGDEF enzymes produced cGAMP, but not the other two signals, inside the cells. This cGAMP regulated the ability of G. sulfurreducens to grow by extracting electrical energy from the metallic minerals, which appears to be a new, biofilm-less lifestyle. Further experiments revealed how Hypr GGDEF enzymes have evolved to preferentially make cGAMP over the other two signals. Together, these findings demonstrate that enzymes with the ability to make several different signals, are capable of generating specific responses in bacterial cells. By understanding how bacteria make decisions, it may be possible to change their behaviors. The findings of Hallberg, Chan et al. help to identify the signaling pathways involved in this decision-making and provide new tools to study them in the future.« less