skip to main content

Title: FES Cycling and Closed-Loop Feedback Control for Rehabilitative Human–Robot Interaction
For individuals with movement impairments due to neurological injuries, rehabilitative therapies such as functional electrical stimulation (FES) and rehabilitation robots hold vast potential to improve their mobility and activities of daily living. Combining FES with rehabilitation robots results in intimately coordinated human–robot interaction. An example of such interaction is FES cycling, where motorized assistance can provide high-intensity and repetitive practice of coordinated limb motion, resulting in physiological and functional benefits. In this paper, the development of multiple FES cycling testbeds and safeguards is described, along with the switched nonlinear dynamics of the cycle–rider system. Closed-loop FES cycling control designs are described for cadence and torque tracking. For each tracking objective, the authors’ past work on robust and adaptive controllers used to compute muscle stimulation and motor current inputs is presented and discussed. Experimental results involving both able-bodied individuals and participants with neurological injuries are provided for each combination of controller and tracking objective. Trade-offs for the control algorithms are discussed based on the requirements for implementation, desired rehabilitation outcomes and resulting rider performance. Lastly, future works and the applicability of the developed methods to additional technologies including teleoperated robotics are outlined.
Authors:
; ;
Award ID(s):
1762829
Publication Date:
NSF-PAR ID:
10231082
Journal Name:
Robotics
Volume:
10
Issue:
2
Page Range or eLocation-ID:
61
ISSN:
2218-6581
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) can be combined with a motorized cycle to offer various rehabilitation options for individuals with neurological conditions. Typically, FES cycling controllers use cooperating muscles and an electric motor to track cadence. In this paper, in addition to cooperative cadence tracking, the motorized cycle tracks an admittance trajectory generated using torque feedback. This method allows the cycle to deviate from the desired cadence trajectory and admit to the rider-applied torque, ensuring safe human-machine interaction. Two sets of uncertain, nonlinear dynamics are presented, one for the human rider and one for the robot, linked by a common measurable interaction torque. After developing cadence and admittance controllers, a Lyapunov-like switched system stability analysis is provided to prove global exponential tracking of the cadence error system, and a passivity analysis is conducted to prove passivity of the cycle’s admittance controller with respect to the rider’s interaction torque. *Note this paper does not properly cite the specific project.
  2. Rehabilitation robotics and functional electrical stimulation (FES) are two promising methods of rehabilitation for people with neurological disorders. In motorized FES cycling, both the rider and the motorized cycle must be controlled for cooperative human-machine interaction. While rehabilitation goals vary widely, FES cycling traditionally rejects rider disturbances to accomplish cadence and power tracking; however, this paper ensures that the cycle accommodates the rider without rejecting rider disturbances as a means to promote function and strength recovery while ensuring rider safety. A cadence and admittance controller are developed to activate the cycle’s electric motor and the rider’s leg muscles through FES when kinematically efficient. Using a single set of combined cycle-rider dynamics, a Lyapunov-like switched systems analysis is conducted to conclude global exponential cadence tracking. A subsequent passivity analysis is conducted to show the admittance controller is passive with respect to the rider. For a desired cadence of 50 RPM, preliminary experiments on one able-bodied participant and one participant with spina bifida demonstrate tracking errors of −0.07±2.59 RPM and −0.20±3.86 RPM, respectively. *Note this paper does not properly cite the specific NSF project number.
  3. For individuals with neurological conditions (NCs) affecting the muscles of their legs, motorized functional electrical stimulation (FES) cycling is a rehabilitation strategy which offers numerous health benefits. Motorized FES cycling is an example of cooperative physical human-robot interaction where both the cycle’s motor and rider’s muscles (through electrical stimulation) must be well controlled to achieve desired performance. Since every NC is unique, adaptive control of motorized FES cycling is motivated over a one-size-fits-all approach. In this paper, a robust sliding-mode controller is employed on the rider’s muscles while an adaptive neural network admittance controller is employed on the cycle’s motor to preserve rider comfort and safety. Through a Lyapunov-like switched systems stability analysis, global asymptotic stability of the cycle controller is guaranteed and the muscle controller is proven to be passive with respect to the cycle. Experiments on one able-bodied participant were conducted to validate the control design.
  4. Introduction: Functional electrical stimulation (FES) induced cycling has been shown to be an effective rehabilitation for those with lower limb movement disorders. However, a consequence of FES is an electromechanical delay (EMD) existing between the stimulation input and the onset of muscle force. The objective of this study is to determine if the cycle crank angle has an effect on the EMD. Methods: Experiments were performed on 10 participants, five healthy and five with neurological conditions resulting in movement disorders. A motor fixed the crank arm of a FES-cycle in 10 degree increments and at each angle stimulation was applied in a random sequence to a combination of the quadriceps femoris and gluteal muscle groups. The EMD was examined by considering the contraction delay (CD) and the residual delay (RD), where the CD (RD) is the time latency between the start (end) of stimulation and the onset (cessation) of torque. Two different measurements were used to examine the CD and RD. Further, two multiple linear regressions were performed on each measurement, one for the left and one for the right muscle groups. Results: The crank angle was determined to be statistically relevant for both the CD and RD. Conclusions: Sincemore »the crank angle has a significant effect on both the CD and RD, the angle has a significant effect on the EMD. Therefore, future efforts should consider the importance of the crank angle when modelling or estimating the EMD to improve control designs and ultimately improve rehabilitative treatments.« less
  5. Many people are affected by a wide range of neuromuscular disorders, many of which can be improved through the use of Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) rehabilitative cycling. Recent improvements in nonlinear, Lyapunov-based FES muscle control with motor assistance in unstimulated regions of the cycle-crank rotation have led to a reduction in muscle fatigue, allowing rehabilitation time to be extended. Studies in rehabilitation have shown that the addition of coordinated movement between the upper limbs and lower limbs can have a positive effect on neural plasticity leading to faster restoration of walking in those who have some neurological disorders. In this paper, to implement coordinated motion during rehabilitation, a strongly coupled bilateral telerobotic system is developed between a hand-cycle system driven by the participant’s volitional efforts and a split-crank leg-cycle system driven by the switched application of FES with motor assistance. A variable operator is applied to the leg-cycle’s motor input during the FES stimulation regions to provide assistance as required. Lyapunov-based analysis methods are used on the combined leg and hand-cycle system to prove global exponential stability. Analysis further proves that all switched system inputs are bounded, thus the states of the telerobotic master (i.e., hand-cycle system) are bounded, therefore,more »the telerobotic system is stable.« less