New primates from the Río Santa Cruz and Río Bote (Early-Mid Miocene), Santa Cruz Province, Argentina
- PAR ID:
- 10233753
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Publicación electrónica de la Asociación Paleontológica Argentina
- Volume:
- 19
- Issue:
- 2
- ISSN:
- 2469-0228
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 230-238
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
Abstract It is increasingly important to document past records of hydrologic change in areas that are drought‐prone to better predict the region's future vulnerability to recharge and water supply. Holocene spring‐associated carbonate deposits serve as terrestrial records of water balance that can complement other local, high‐resolution proxies that are moisture‐sensitive. Here we examine two carbonate deposits (one inactive perched tufa site and one active fluvial tufa site) that form from ambient‐temperature freshwater springs, as proxies of their depositional conditions. Radiocarbon (14C) analyses of charcoal fragments from the inactive perched tufa record depositional ages of 6.2 ± 0.06 (2σ) cal kabpand 8.0 ± 0.04 (2σ) cal kabpand agree with the age models from other proxies of past pluvial periods in the region (~16 to 5 ka). The active fluvial tufas date to 853 ± 0.4 calbp,representing conditions similar to modern flow. Geomorphologic and radiocarbon results indicate the perched tufa reflects wetter conditions fed by a higher water table. Stable isotopic analyses of carbonate (δ13C, δ18O) reveal distinct isotopic values between modern and early–mid‐Holocene tufa. This work underscores potential for the analysis of other moisture‐sensitive tufa deposits in coastal central California.more » « less
-
The Río Pichileufú (RP) fossil locality contains one of Patagonia’s only well-dated middle Eocene floras, deposited ca. 47.7 Ma during the onset of global temperature decline and South America's tectonic isolation. In 1938, Edward W. Berry described 135 species from RP based on compressed angiosperm leaves and rare reproductive structures. The flora was considered highly diverse and to have predominantly Neotropical affinities; however, many of Berry’s identifications were botanically incorrect, confusing interpretations of composition, diversity, and biogeography. Only a fraction of the flora has been studied since, and substantial new collections have remained unevaluated. Here, we reassess the fossil leaves from RP, creating a stable platform for systematic and ecological analyses. We use a morphotype approach to bypass the numerous prior taxonomic errors, while preserving nomenclatural links to specimens. We jointly consider the type and cohort (n = 696) and recent (n = 1286) collections. We validate 82 leaf morphotypes in the type collections, much lower than Berry’s estimate of 131, and consider 43 species as indeterminate. We find that 44 historical species were improperly split, lumped, or misaligned to existing names. At least 12 plant families and 30 plant genera initially reported from the site are unreliable, including Poaceae, Cannabaceae, Ericaceae, Hydrangeaceae, and Rosaceae. However, considering all the collections, we recognize 158 total leaf morphotypes. Reliable taxa include ginkgophytes, Norfolk Island pines (Araucaria), legumes (Fabaceae), soapberries (Sapindaceae), and laurels (Lauraceae). Although Berry's initial assessment of diversity at RP was significantly overestimated, including new material re-establishes the flora as exceptionally diverse.more » « less
An official website of the United States government

