More Like this

1. A finite element implementation of finite deformation surface and bulk poroelasticity

   https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-023-02398-5  

   Kim, Jaemin; Ang, Ida; Ballarin, Francesco; Hui, Chung-Yuen; Bouklas, Nikolaos (October 2023, Computational Mechanics)
2. A nodal immersed finite element-finite difference method

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111890  

   Wells, David R.; Vadala-Roth, Ben; Lee, Jae H.; Griffith, Boyce E. (March 2023, Journal of Computational Physics)
3. Connections between finite difference and finite element approximations

   https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00036811.2021.2005785  

   Constantin Bacuta; Cristina Bacuta (October 2021, Applicable analysis)

   Taylor And Francis Online (Ed.)

   We present useful connections between the finite difference and the finite element methods for a model boundary value problem. We start from the observation that, in the finite element context, the interpolant of the solution in one dimension coincides with the finite element approximation of the solution. This result can be viewed as an extension of the Green function formula for the solution at the continuous level. We write the finite difference and the finite element systems such that the two corresponding linear systems have the same stiffness matrices and compare the right hand side load vectors for the two methods. Using evaluation of the Green function, a formula for the inverse of the stiffness matrix is extended to the case of non-uniformly distributed mesh points. We provide an error analysis based on the connection between the two methods and estimate the energy norm of the difference of the two solutions. Interesting extensions to the 2D case are provided. 

   more » « less
4. Universal covers of finite groups

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalgebra.2020.10.032  

   Dietrich, Heiko; Hulpke, Alexander (March 2021, Journal of Algebra)

   null (Ed.)
5. Coprime automorphisms of finite groups

   https://doi.org/10.1090/tran/8553  

   Acciarri, Cristina; Guralnick, Robert; Shumyatsky, Pavel (July 2022, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society)

   Let G G be a finite group admitting a coprime automorphism α \alpha of order e e . Denote by I G ( α ) I_G(\alpha ) the set of commutators g − 1 g α g^{-1}g^\alpha , where g ∈ G g\in G , and by [ G , α ] [G,\alpha ] the subgroup generated by I G ( α ) I_G(\alpha ) . We study the impact of I G ( α ) I_G(\alpha ) on the structure of [ G , α ] [G,\alpha ] . Suppose that each subgroup generated by a subset of I G ( α ) I_G(\alpha ) can be generated by at most r r elements. We show that the rank of [ G , α ] [G,\alpha ] is ( e , r ) (e,r) -bounded. Along the way, we establish several results of independent interest. In particular, we prove that if every element of I G ( α ) I_G(\alpha ) has odd order, then [ G , α ] [G,\alpha ] has odd order too. Further, if every pair of elements from I G ( α ) I_G(\alpha ) generates a soluble, or nilpotent, subgroup, then [ G , α ] [G,\alpha ] is soluble, or respectively nilpotent. 

   more » « less