Breast cancer is a leading cause of global cancer‐related deaths, and metastasis is the overwhelming culprit of poor patient prognosis. The most nefarious aspect of metastasis is dormancy, a prolonged period between primary tumor resection and relapse. Current therapies are insufficient at killing dormant cells; thus, they can remain quiescent in the body for decades until eventually undergoing a phenotypic switch, resulting in metastases that are more adaptable and drug resistant. Unfortunately, dormancy has few in vitro models, largely because lab‐derived cell lines are highly proliferative. Existing models address tumor dormancy, not cellular dormancy, because tracking individual cells is technically challenging. To combat this problem, a live cell lineage approach to find and track individual dormant cells, distinguishing them from proliferative and dying cells over multiple days, is adapted. This approach is applied across a range of different in vitro microenvironments. This approach reveals that the proportion of cells that exhibit long‐term quiescence is regulated by both cell intrinsic and extrinsic factors, with the most dormant cells found in 3D collagen gels. This paper envisions that this approach will prove useful to biologists and bioengineers in the dormancy community to identify, quantify, and study dormant tumor cells.
- Award ID(s):
- 2019745
- PAR ID:
- 10248565
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- npj Breast Cancer
- Volume:
- 7
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 2374-4677
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
more » « less
Abstract -
Tumor microenvironment is a complex niche consisting of cancer cells and stromal cells in a network of extracellular matrix proteins and various soluble factors. Dynamic interactions among cellular and non-cellular components of the tumor microenvironment regulate tumor initiation and progression. Fibroblasts are the most abundant stromal cell type and dynamically interact with cancer cells both in primary tumors and in metastases. Cancer cells activate resident fibroblasts to produce and secrete soluble signaling molecules that support proliferation, migration, matrix invasion, and drug resistance of cancer cell and tumor angiogenesis. In recent years, various forms of three-dimensional tumor models have been developed to study tumor–stromal interactions and to identify anti-cancer drugs that block these interactions. There is currently a technological gap in development of tumor models that are physiologically relevant, scalable, and allow convenient, on-demand addition of desired components of the tumor microenvironment. In this review, we discuss three studies from our group that focus on developing bioengineered models to study tumor-stromal signaling. We will present these studies chronologically and based on their increasing complexity. We will discuss the validation of the models using a CXCL12-CXCR4 chemokine-receptor signaling present among activated fibroblasts and breast cancer cells in solid tumors, highlight the advantages and shortcomings of the models, and conclude with our perspectives on their applications. Impact statement Tumor stroma plays an important role in progression of cancers to a fatal metastatic disease. Modern treatment strategies are considering targeting tumor stroma to improve outcomes for cancer patients. A current challenge to develop stroma-targeting therapeutics is the lack of preclinical physiologic tumor models. Animal models widely used in cancer research lack human stroma and are not amenable to screening of chemical compounds for cancer drug discovery. In this review, we outline in vitro three-dimensional tumor models that we have developed to study the interactions among cancer cells and stromal cells. We describe development of the tumor models in a modular fashion, from a spheroid model to a sophisticated organotypic model, and discuss the importance of using correct physiologic models to recapitulate tumor-stromal signaling. These biomimetic tumor models will facilitate understanding of tumor-stromal signaling biology and provide a scalable approach for testing and discovery of cancer drugs.more » « less
-
more » « less
Abstract Despite recent advances in breast cancer treatment, drug resistance frequently presents as a challenge, contributing to a higher risk of relapse and decreased overall survival rate. It is now generally recognized that the extracellular matrix and cellular heterogeneity of the tumor microenvironment influences the cancer cells' ultimate fate. Therefore, strategies employed to examine mechanisms of drug resistance must take microenvironmental influences, as well as genetic mutations, into account. This review discusses three‐dimensional (3D) in vitro model systems which incorporate microenvironmental influences to study mechanisms of drug resistance in breast cancer. These bioengineered models include spheroid‐based models, biomaterial‐based models such as polymeric scaffolds and hydrogels, and microfluidic chip‐based models. The advantages of these model systems over traditionally studied two‐dimensional tissue culture polystyrene are examined. Additionally, the applicability of such 3D models for studying the impact of tumor microenvironment signals on drug response and/or resistance is discussed. Finally, the potential of such models for use in the development of strategies to combat drug resistance and determine the most promising treatment regimen is explored.
-
more » « less
Abstract Triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for 15–25% of diagnosed breast cancers, and its lack of a clinically defined therapeutic target has caused patients to suffer from earlier relapse and higher mortality rates than patients with other breast cancer subtypes. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non‐coding RNAs that regulate the expression of multiple genes through RNA interference to maintain normal tissue function. The tumor suppressor miR‐34a is downregulated in TNBC, and its loss‐of‐expression correlates with worse disease outcomes. Therefore, delivering miR‐34a mimics into TNBC cells is a promising strategy to combat disease progression. To achieve this goal, we synthesized layer‐by‐layer assembled nanoparticles (LbL NPs) comprised of spherical poly(lactic‐co‐glycolic acid) cores surrounded by alternating layers of poly‐L‐lysine (PLL) and miR‐34a. TNBC cells internalized these LbL NPs to a greater extent than polyplexes comprised of PLL and miRNA, and confocal microscopy showed that LbL NPs delivered a substantial fraction of miR‐34a cargo into the cytosol. This yielded robust suppression of the miR‐34a target genes CCND‐1, Notch‐1, Bcl‐2, Survivin, and MDR‐1, which reduced TNBC cell proliferation and induced cell cycle arrest. These data validate that miR‐34a delivery can impair TNBC cell function and support continued investigation of this platform for treatment of TNBC.
-
A biomarker is a physiological observable marker that acts as a stand-in and, in the best-case scenario, forecasts a clinically significant outcome. Diagnostic biomarkers are more convenient and cost-effective than directly measuring the ultimate clinical outcome. Cancer is among the most prominent global health problems and a major cause of morbidity and death globally. Therefore, cancer biomarker assays that are trustworthy, consistent, precise, and verified are desperately needed. Biomarker-based tumor detection holds a lot of promise for improving disease knowledge at the molecular scale and early detection and surveillance. In contrast to conventional approaches, surface plasmon resonance (SPR) allows for the quick and less invasive screening of a variety of circulating indicators, such as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), microRNA (miRNA), circulating tumor cells (CTCs), lipids, and proteins. With several advantages, the SPR technique is a particularly beneficial choice for the point-of-care identification of biomarkers. As a result, it enables the timely detection of tumor markers, which could be used to track cancer development and suppress the relapse of malignant tumors. This review emphasizes advancements in SPR biosensing technologies for cancer detection.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-021-00269-x
